Advancing Neutral Monism in Big History and Transhumanist Philosophy

  • Ojochogwu Abdul


Big History (or ‘Epic of Evolution”) and transhumanism are two complementary ways of approaching the origin, evolution, and future of the Universe and humankind. Underlying the assumptions of most big histories and transhumanisms is a philosophical position called “scientific materialism” (“materialism,” or sometimes “naturalism”).This materialism results predominantly in the rejection of any purely mental substance (idealism) in the philosophy of mind, ontology, and natural sciences that both discourses build upon. Our essay explores how advancing neutral monism in its positing of an alternative fundamental stuff holds new promise of understanding and progress for the big history and transhumanist projects.


  1. 1.
    Adams, Frederick. 2003. “The Informational Turn in Philosophy,” Minds and Machines 13: 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banks, Erik, C. 2003. Ernst Mach’s World of Elements, Dordrecht: KluwerGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    __________ “Neutral Monism Reconsidered.” Philosophical Psychology, 23 (2): 173 — 187.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bohan, Elsie. January 2016. “Empiricism Is Not A Dirty Word.” Origins, VI (1):3–6.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown, Cynthia Stokes. January 2016. “The Meaning of Big History, Philosophically Speaking” Origins. VI (1): 7–13.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chalmers, David. 1996. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chomsky, Noam. 2000. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Christian, David. 2015. “Mapping to Meaning.” In Creation Stories in Dialogue: The Bible, Science, and Folk Traditions, edited by Alan Culpepper and Jan van der Watt. Leiden Boston and Tokyo: Brill.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davies, Paul. 2010. Universe from Bit. In Information and the Nature if Reality: From Physics to Metaphysics, edited by Davies, Paul and Gregerson, Niels, H. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dawkins, Richard. 1986. The Blind Watchmaker. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Floridi, Luciano. 2008. “A Defence of Informational Structural Realism.” Synthese 161(2): 219–253.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    __________. 2009. “Against Digital Ontology.” Synthese 168(1): 151–178.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fredkin, Edward. 2003. “An Introduction to Digital Philosophy.” International Journal of Theoretical Physics 42(2): 189–247.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gleick, James. 2011. The Information: A History, A Theory, A Flood. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goetz, Stewart and Taliaferro, Charles. 2008. Naturalism. Grand Rapids, MI and Cambridge, UK: William B. Eerdmans Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Horgan, John. 2016. “The Singularity and the Neural Code.” Scientific American. Accessed April 2, 2018.
  17. 17.
    James, William. 1905. “La Notion De Conscience”, Archives de Psychologie, V (17). Translated as “The Notion of Consciousness.” Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12(7), (2005): 55–64.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuhn. Robert, L. 2015. “Forget Space-Time: Information May Create The Cosmos” Expert Voices.,html Accessed March 30, 2018.
  19. 19.
    Kurzweil, Ray. 2005. The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ladyman, James, and Don, Ross. 2007. Everything Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lewis, David. 1990. “What Experience Teaches,” in Mind and Cognition: A Reader, W. Lycan (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lloyd, Seth. 2006. Programming the Universe: From the Big Bang to Quantum Computers. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mach, Ernst. 1886. Die Analyse der Empfindungen und das Verhältnis des Physischen zum Psychischen, fifth edition translated as The Analysis of Sensations and the Relation of Physical to the Psychical, New York: Dover. 1959.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    ———. 1959. The Analysis of Sensations and the Relation of Physical to the Psychical, trans. Williams, C.M. and Waterlow. S. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    More, Max. 2013. “The Philosophy of Transhumanism” The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future, 1st Edition, edited by More, Max and Vita-More, Natasha. Los Angeles, CA: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nagel, Thomas. 2002. Concealment and Exposure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    __________. 2012. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Perry, Phillip. 2017. “The Basis of the Universe May Not Be Energy or Matter but Information.” Big Think. Accessed March 15, 2018.
  29. 29.
    Planck, Max. Quotes. Accessed April 6, 2018.
  30. 30.
    Russell, Bertrand. 1927a. The Analysis of Matter. London: George Allen & Unwin.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    __________.–1927b. An Outline of Philosophy. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sayre, Kenneth. 1976. Cybernetics and the Philosophy of Mind. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schneider. Susan. 2008. Future Minds: Transhumanism, Cognitive Enhancement and the Nature of Persons. Accessed February 2, 2018.
  34. 34.
    Spier, Fred. 2010. Big History and the Future of Humanity. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stubenberg, Leopold, “Neutral Monism.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. Accessed March 10, 2018.
  36. 36.
    Tegmark, Max. 2014. Our Mathematical Universe. My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Teilhard de Chardin, Pierre. 1999. The Human Phenomenon, trans. Appleton-Weber, Sarah. Brighton, U.K.: Sussex Academic Press.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Various. 2003. “The Transhumanist FAQ: v 2.1.” World Transhumanist Association. Accessed February, 10, 2018.
  39. 39.
    Vedral, Vlatko. 2010. Decoding Reality: The Universe as Quantum Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Werner, Heisenberg, Quotes. Accessed April 6, 2018.
  41. 41.
    Wheeler, John A. 1994. It from bit. In At Home in the Universe. Woodbury, NY: American Institute of Physics Press.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    __________. 1990. “Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links.” In Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information, edited by W.H. Zurek. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wikipedia. 2018. “Decoding Reality” Accessed March 9, 2018.
  44. 44.
    Various. 2003. “The Transhumanist FAQ: v 2.1.” World Transhumanist Association. Accessed February, 10, 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ojochogwu Abdul
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LagosLagosNigeria

Personalised recommendations