Advertisement

The Role of Industry and Economic Context in Open Innovation

  • Abiodun EgbetokunEmail author
  • Omolayo Oluwatope
  • David Adeyeye
  • Maruf Sanni
Chapter

Abstract

Using innovation survey data on a sample of UK manufacturing firms, Laursen and Salter (Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27:131–150, 2006) documented a non-monotonous relationship between external search strategies and firm-level innovative performance. We find partially similar results in a combined sample of Nigerian manufacturing and service firms. A major discrepancy is that external search appears not to matter for radical innovation in our sample. Based on multiple research streams including economics of innovation and development economics, we develop and test new hypotheses on sectoral differences and the role of the economic context. We find that in a developing context, a wider range of innovation obstacles implies broader external search and more intense obstacles require deeper search. We explore the implications of these results for management research and theory.

Keywords

Open innovation Search strategies Innovation obstacles Technological and non-technological innovation Nigeria 

References

  1. Adeoti, J. O. (2012). Technology-related factors as determinants of export potential of Nigerian manufacturing firms. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(4), 487–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archibugi, D. (2001). Pavitt’s taxanomy sixteen years on: A review article. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 10(5), 415–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. AU-NEPAD. (2014). African innovation outlook II. Pretoria: African Union–New Partnership for Africa’s Development. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.nepad.org/system/files/AIO_2_Final%20Product[2].pdf
  4. Biggs, T., & Shah, M. K. (2006). African SMES, networks, and manufacturing performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(11), 3043–3066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carvalho, L., Costa, T., & Caiado, J. (2013). Determinants of innovation in a small open economy: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 14(3), 583–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castellacci, F. (2008). Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation. Research Policy, 37, 978–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). The era of open innovation. Sloan Management Review, Summer, 35–41.Google Scholar
  8. Chesbrough, H. (2011). Bringing open innovation to services. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(2), 85–90.Google Scholar
  9. Chiang, Y.-H., & Hung, K.-P. (2010). Exploring open search strategies and perceived innovation performance from the perspective of inter-organizational knowledge flows. R&D Management, 40(3), 292–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, 99(397), 569–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Jong, J., & Freel, M. (2010). Absorptive capacity and the reach of collaboration in high technology small firms. Research Policy, 39(1), 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Jong, J. P., & Marsili, O. (2006). The fruit flies of innovations: A taxonomy of innovative small firms. Research Policy, 35(2), 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Leeuw, T., Lokshin, B., & Duysters, G. (2014). Returns to alliance portfolio diversity: The relative effects of partner diversity on firm’s innovative performance and productivity. Journal of Business Research, 67(9), 1839–1849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duysters, G., & Lokshin, B. (2011). Determinants of alliance portfolio complexity and its effect on innovative performance of companies. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(4), 570–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Egbetokun, A. A., Siyanbola, W., Sanni, M., Olamade, O., Adeniyi, A., & Irefin, I. (2009). What drives innovation? Inferences from an industry-wide survey in Nigeria. International Journal of Technology Management, 45(1/2), 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Egbetokun, A., Siyanbola, W., & Adeniyi, A. (2010). Learning to innovate in Nigeria’s cable and wire manufacturing sub-sector: Inferences from a firm-level case study. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 7(1), 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Egbetokun, A., Adeniyi, A., & Siyanbola, W. (2012). On the capability of SMEs to innovate: The cable and wire manufacturing sub-sector in Nigeria. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 9(1/2), 64–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., & Chesbrough, H. (2009). Open R&D and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management, 39(4), 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ernst, D., & Kim, L. (2002). Global production networks, knowledge diffusion, and local capability formation. Research Policy, 31(8/9), 1417–1429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Evangelista, R. (2000). Sectoral patterns of technological change in services. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 9(3), 183–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Faems, D., Van Looy, B., & Debackere, K. (2005). Inter-organizational collaboration and innovation: Towards a portfolio approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(3), 238–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Garriga, H., von Krogh, G., & Spaeth, S. (2013). How constraints and knowledge impact open innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 34(9), 1134–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goedhuys, M. (2007). Learning, product innovation, and firm heterogeneity in developing countries; evidence from Tanzania. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(2), 269–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gronum, S., Verreynne, M.-L., & Kastelle, T. (2012). The role of networks in small and medium-sized enterprise innovation and firm performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 257–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hadjimanolis, A. (2000). An investigation of innovation antecedents in small firms in the context of a small developing country. R&D Management, 30(3), 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoffman, K., Parejo, M., Bessant, J., & Perren, L. (1998). Small firms, R&D, technology and innovation in the UK: A literature review. Technovation, 18(1), 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ilori, M., Oke, J., & Sanni, S. (2000). Management of new product development in selected food companies in Nigeria. Technovation, 20(6), 333–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jiang, R. J., Tao, Q. T., & Santoro, M. D. (2010). Alliance portfolio diversity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 31(10), 1136–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lall, S. (1992). Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development, 20(2), 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lane, P., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lane, P. J., Koka, B., & Pathak, S. (2002). A thematic analysis and critical assessment of absorptive capacity research. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2002, M1–M6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lane, P., Koka, B., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 833–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lin, C., Wu, Y.-J., Chang, C., Wang, W., & Lee, C.-Y. (2012). The alliance innovation performance of R&D alliances: The absorptive capacity perspective. Technovation, 32(5), 282–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lundvall, B.-Å. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 349–369). London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  38. Mytelka, L. (2000). Local systems of innovation in a globalized world economy. Industry and Innovation, 7(1), 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. NACETEM. (2010). Assessment of innovation capability in the manufacturing sector in Nigeria (Monograph Series No. 4). Ile-Ife: National Centre for Technology Management.Google Scholar
  40. OECD. (2005). Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data: Oslo manual (3rd ed.). Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oerlemans, L., Knoben, J., & Pretorius, M. (2013). Alliance portfolio diversity, radical and incremental innovation: The moderating role of technology management. Technovation, 33(6–7), 234–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oluwatope, O. B., Adeyeye, A. D., Egbetokun, A. A., Sanni, M., Aremu, F. S., & Siyanbola, W. O. (2014). Knowledge sources and innovative performance: Evidence from Nigerian manufacturing firms. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 10(2/3), 209–224.Google Scholar
  43. Oyebisi, T., Ilori, M., & Nassar, M. (1996). Industry-academic relations: An assessment of the linkages between a university and some enterprises in Nigeria. Technovation, 16(4), 203–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, B. (2005). Inter-firm collaboration and competitive pressures: SME footwear clusters in Nigeria. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1(3/4), 343–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, B. (2006). Systems of innovation and underdevelopment: An institutional perspective. Science, Technology and Society, 11(2), 239–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, B. (2007). Learning in local systems and global linkages: The Otigba computer hardware cluster in Nigeria. In B. Oyelaran-Oyeyinka & D. McCormick (Eds.), Industrial clusters and innovation systems in Africa. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, B., Laditan, G., & Esubiyi, A. (1996). Industrial innovation in sub-Saharan Africa: The manufacturing sector in Nigeria. Research Policy, 25(7), 1081–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Radwan, I., & Pellegrini, G. (2010). Knowledge, productivity, and innovation in Nigeria (Technical report). Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved April 30, 2010, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EDUCATION/Resources/278200-1099079877269/Knowledge_productivity_innovation_Nigeria.pdf
  49. Romijn, H. (1997). Acquisition of technological capability in development: A quantitative case study of Pakistan’s capital goods sector. World Development, 25(3), 359–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stirling, A. (2007). A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 4(15), 707–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Todorova, G., & Durisin, B. (2007). Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 774–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tomlinson, P. (2010). Co-operative ties and innovation: Some new evidence for UK manufacturing. Research Policy, 39(6), 762–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vega-Jurado, J., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A., & de Lucio, I. F. (2009). Does external knowledge sourcing matter for innovation? Evidence from the Spanish manufacturing industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(4), 634–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wignaraja, G. (2002). Firm size, technological capabilities and market-oriented policies in Mauritius. Oxford Development Studies, 30(1), 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zahra, S., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abiodun Egbetokun
    • 1
    Email author
  • Omolayo Oluwatope
    • 1
  • David Adeyeye
    • 1
  • Maruf Sanni
    • 1
  1. 1.National Centre for Technology Management (Federal Ministry of Science and Technology), PMB 012Obafemi Awolowo UniversityIle-IfeNigeria

Personalised recommendations