Advertisement

On the Security of MIL-STD-1553 Communication Bus

  • Orly StanEmail author
  • Adi Cohen
  • Yuval EloviciEmail author
  • Asaf ShabtaiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11552)

Abstract

MIL-STD-1553 is a military standard that defines the physical and logical layers, and a command/response time division multiplexing of a communication bus used in military and aerospace avionic platforms for more than 40 years. As a legacy platform, MIL-STD-1553 was designed for high level of fault tolerance while less attention was taken with regard to security. Recent studies already addressed the impact of successful cyber-attacks on aerospace vehicles that are implementing MIL-STD-1553. In this work we present a security analysis of MIL-STD-1553, which enumerates the assets and threats to the communication bus, as well as defines the attacker’s profile.

Keywords

MIL-STD-1553 Anomaly detection Communication bus security 

References

  1. 1.
    Chong, J., Pal, P., Atigetchi, M., Rubel, P., Webber, F.: Survivability architecture of a mission critical system: the DPASA example. In: 21st Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC 2005), December 2005, pp. 10, 504Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Data Device Corporation: MIL-STD-1553 Designer’s Guide (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gillen, A., Shelton, J.: Introduction of 3910 high speed data bus. In: Military Communications Conference, MILCOM 1992, Conference Record. Communications-Fusing Command, Control and Intelligence, pp. 956–960. IEEE (1992)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gligor, V.D.: A note on the denial-of-service problem. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 139–149 (1983)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jiang, W., Guo, W., Sang, N.: Periodic real-time message scheduling for confidentiality-aware cyber-physical system in wireless networks. In: 2010 Fifth International Conference on Frontier of Computer Science and Technology, pp. 355–360, August 2010Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuhn, M.G., Anderson, R.J.: Soft tempest: hidden data transmission using electromagnetic emanations. In: Aucsmith, D. (ed.) IH 1998. LNCS, vol. 1525, pp. 124–142. Springer, Heidelberg (1998).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49380-8_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lindsay, J.R.: Stuxnet and the limits of cyber warfare. Secur. Stud. 22(3), 365–404 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu, Y., Ning, P., Reiter, M.K.: False data injection attacks against state estimation in electric power grids. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. (TISSEC) 14(1), 13 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mayoux, J.-J.: The data bus of the next generation European fighters. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 1993 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, NAECON 1993, pp. 152–156. IEEE (1993)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McGraw, R.M., Fowler, M.J., Umphress, D., MacDonald, R.A.: Cyber threat impact assessment and analysis for space vehicle architectures. In: International Society for Optics and Photonics SPIE Defense+ Security, p. 90850K (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miller, B., Rowe, D.: A survey SCADA of and critical infrastructure incidents. In: Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Research in Information Technology, RIIT 2012, pp. 51–56. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mo, Y., Sinopoli, B.: False data injection attacks in control systems. In: Preprints of the 1st Workshop on Secure Control Systems, pp. 1–6 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Murdock, J.K., Koenig, J.R.: Open systems avionics network to replace MIL-STD-1553. In: Proceedings of 19th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 19th DASC (Cat. No. 00CH37126), vol. 1, pp. 4E5/1–4E5/6, October 2000Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nguyen, T.D.: Towards MIL-STD-1553B covert channel analysis. Technical report, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    US Department of Defense: Fiber Optics Mechanization of an Aircraft Internal Time Division Command/Response Multiplex Data Bus, May 1988Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vai, M., et al.: Systems design of cybersecurity in embedded systems. In: 2016 IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC), pp. 1–6, September 2016Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Software and Information Systems EngineeringBen-Gurion University of the NegevBeershebaIsrael

Personalised recommendations