Experimental Investigation of Basalt Fiber/Epoxy Composite for Automobile Leaf Spring

  • L. B. RautEmail author
  • S. V. JadhavEmail author
  • V. S. Jagadale
  • Vijay Swami
  • S. R. Gavali
  • S. B. Gade
Conference paper


The introduction of composite materials has made it possible to decrease the weight of a leaf spring without any reduction on the load carrying capacity and the stiffness. FRP springs have significant fatigue resistance and durability. But the weight reduction of leaf spring is achieved not only by the material replacement but also by the optimization in design. To determine the material properties, different mechanical tests were carried out and optimized parameters were obtained by minimizing the weight of composite mono leaf spring. Based on the optimization results, the composite material mono leaf spring with 35:65 volume fraction showed better mechanical properties. Static load testing and FFT analyzer testing were carried out to obtain flexural strength and natural frequency of Baslt fiber composite mono leaf spring. The results obtained from the experimental testing are validated using ANSYS software. The design optimization also showed noteworthy potential improvement in the performance of mono leaf spring.


Composite mono-leaf spring Optimization Flexural strength Natural frequency 


  1. 1.
    Shishay Amare G (2012) Design, simulation, and prototyping of single composite leaf spring for light weight vehicle. Glob J Res Eng Mech Mech Eng 12(7). Version 1.0 the YearGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Satpute AA et al (2013) Mono composite leaf spring – design and testing. Indian J Appl Res 3(7). ISSN:2249-555XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Patil RM et al (2014) Fabrication and testing of composite leaf spring for light passenger vehicle. Int J Current Eng Technol. ISSN:2277 – 4106 © INPRESSCOGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kumar A et al (2014) Design, analysis, manufacturing and testing of mono composite leaf spring using UD E-glass Fiber/epoxy. Int J Adv Technol Eng Sci 2(12)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pozhilarasu V et al (2013) Performance analysis of steel leaf spring with composite leaf spring and fabrication of composite leaf spring. Int J Adv Technol Eng Sci 2(3). ISSN:2319-5991Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gaikwad D et al (2012) Composite leaf spring for light weight vehicle - materials, manufacturing process, advantages and limitations. Int J Eng Technol Sci 3(2):410–413Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shokrieh MM et al (2003) “Analysis and optimization of a composite leaf spring”. Composites Research Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Narmak, Tehran 16844, Iran. Compos Struct 60:317–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kumar TA et al Design and material optimization of heavy vhicle leaf spring. IJRMET, vol 4, special issue .1, November 2013–April-2014Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kumar MA et al (2012) Design optimization of leaf spring. Int J Eng Res Appl (IJERA) 2(6):759–765. ISSN:2248–9622Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eranpurwala M et al (2014) “Experimental and computational methods to find the modal frequencies of E-Glass/Epoxy mono composite leaf spring designed for TATAACE HD”Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SVERI’s College of EngineeringSolapur, PandharpurIndia
  2. 2.MIT College of Raılway Engineering and ResearchBarshiIndia

Personalised recommendations