Advertisement

Pavement Performance Index for Ratıng of Flexıble Pavements

  • Shruti S. Wadalkar
  • R. K. Lad
  • R. K. Jain
Conference paper

Abstract

In this paper author has made an attempt to develop a Pavement Performance Index (PPI) for a rating of flexible pavements. For the development of the PPI model, normalized method of fuzzy multiple criteria decision making method has been used. Total sixteen parameters have been considered as structural and functional indicators. Expert’s opinion was taken from the field of transportation engineering in the form of linguistic terms. These terms were then converted into fuzzy numbers and a model has been developed to determine pavement performance index. The evaluation of the model has been shown in the paper by illustrative example, in which three segments of roads were considered and the values for all indicators were assumed. By converting these values into fuzzy number PPI of the three segments of the road was evaluated and rating of roads was done. From this research work, it has been concluded that this method can be used for the evaluation of pavement performance and their rating.

Keywords

Pavement Performance Index Pavements Fuzzy multiple criteria decision making Normalized weightage method Pavement performance rating 

Nomenclature

Akij

Fuzzy number of sub criteria

e

Crisp Score

Cmk

Average crisp score

TS

Total Score

PPI

Pavement Performance Index

References

  1. 1.
    Sayers MW, Gillespie TD, Paterson WD (1986) Guidelines for the conduct and calibration of road roughness measurements. World Bank Technical Paper 46, The World Bank, Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carry WN, Irick PE (1960) The pavement servicibilty performance and concept. Highway Research Bulletin 250, Highway Research Board, Washington DC, pp 40–58Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaufmann A, Gupta MM (1991) Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic theory and application. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Danial M, Ratnasamy M (2010) Fuzzy inference and multi-criteria decision making applications in pavement rehabilitation prioritization. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 4(10):4740–4748Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krishan KH, Feipeng X, AmirkhanianSerji N, Juang C (2010) Hsein, :using fuzzy logic and expert system approaches in evaluating flexible pavement distress: case study. J Transp Eng ASCE 136(2):149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sun L, Gu W (2011) Pavement condition assessment using fuzzy logic theory and analytic hierarchy process. J Transp Eng ASCE 137(9):648–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Waqar HS, Baladi Gilbert Y, Karim C (2011) Impact of pavement surface monitoring frequency on pavement management decision making. T & DI Congress, ASCE, pp 656–666Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shah Yogesh U, Jain SS, Tiwari D, Jain MK (2012) Soft computing applications for urban pavement maintenance management system. Int Conf Adv Architect Civ Eng 1:542–547Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Venkata M, Imad B, Khushminder S, Per U, Harvey JT, Sivaneswaran N (2012) Mechanistic-empirical and Life-cycle cost analysis for optimizing flexible pavement maintenanceand rehabilitation. J Transp Eng ASCE:625–633Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    CheryPoint: pavement performance prediction through fuzzy logic using marine corps air station. (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oladele AS (2013) Improved intelligent pavement performance (IIPP) modeling for Botswana district gravel road networks: airfield and highway pavement 2013: sustainable and efficient pavements, ASCE, pp 1358–1369Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Avinash NR, Vinay HN, Prasad D, Dinesh SV, ASCE AM, Dattatreya JK (2014) Performance evaluation of low volume flexible pavements – A case study. T & DI, ASCE, pp 69–78Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aditya M and Samer M(2014) Simultaneous network optimization approach for pavement management systems. J Infrastruct Sys, 04014010-1- 04014010-7Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gholamreza H, Esmaeeli AN (2014) Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making approach for pavement project evaluation using life-cycle cost/performance analysis. J Infrastruct Syst ASCE 20(2):04014002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karim FMA, Rubasi KAH, Saleh AA (2016) The road pavement condition index. Evaluation and maintenance: a case study of Yemen. Organ Technol Manag Constr 8:1446–1455Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shruti S. Wadalkar
    • 1
  • R. K. Lad
    • 2
  • R. K. Jain
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringDIT, SPPUPuneIndia
  2. 2.JSPM Narhe Technical Campus, SPPUPuneIndia
  3. 3.RSCOEPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations