Advertisement

Sewage Sludge Ash as a Partial Replacement of Cement in Concrete

  • Pandurang Khawal
  • Govind Sangwai
Conference paper

Abstract

Sewage sludge ash (SSA) is the by-product obtained from incinerating mechanically sewage sludge. By using the small amount of sewage sludge ash (SSA) mortars of comparable strength can be produced to replace cement. However, information on how SSA affects the properties of cement mortars is limited to given the Pozzolanic activities of most SSA being modest. This study identified the mechanisms behind some beneficial effects of the SSA on the strength development of mortars through a comparison study with fine sewage sludge ash (FSSA) and pulverized fly ash (PFA). The findings of this study indicated that the presence of SSA accelerates the rate of heat evolution from cement hydration while PFA does not produce this effect (Chen Z, Poon CS, Constr Build Mater 154:791–803, 2017). A higher content of SSA or FSSA produces a greater effect. Replacing cement by SSA or FSSA up to 10% did not induce significant changes to the pore structure of the pastes. The strength of the mortars, PFA reduces the drying shrinkage of the mortars, but SSA causes greater drying shrinkage due to increasing content of mesopores with sizes less than 0.025 mm. This harmful effect is greater with FSSA.

Keywords

Sewage sludge ash Pore structure The heat of hydration Sewage sludge incineration Ash characteristics Pozzolanic cement 

References

  1. 1.
    Bondar D, Lynsdale CJ, Milestone NB, Hassani N, Ramezanianpour AA (2011) Engineering properties of alkali activated natural Pozzolan concrete. ACI J Mater 108(1):64–72Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen Z, Poon CS (2017) Comparative studies on the effects of sewage sludge ash and fly ash on cement hydration and properties of cement mortars. Constr Build Mater 154:791–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kalwane UB, Dahake AG, Upadhye VR (2015) Effect of polymer modified steel fibre reinforced concrete on bond strength. JoEAM 6(2):33–43Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kannan V, Ganesan K (2012) Mechanical and transport properties in ternary blended self-compacting concrete with Metakaoline and fly ash. IOSRJMCE 2:22–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Patil JV (2017) Partial replacement of cement by fly ash in concrete mix design. IRJET 4(11):1148–1150Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Petrus C, Hamid HA, Ibrahim A, Parke G (2010) Experimental behaviour of concrete filled thin walled steel tubes with tab stiffeners. J Constr Steel Res 66(7):915–922. ELSVIERCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sachithanandam P, Meikandaan TP (2015) Properties and strength of glass fibre reinforced geopolymer concrete. IJIRSET 4(6):4409–4416Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sharma KK (2018) Solid waste management in India. IJMRA 8(7):672–690. Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vageesh HP, Reena K (2015) Effect of size and volume of coarse aggregate on the properties of self-compacting concrete. IJREAT 2(6):47–53Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pandurang Khawal
    • 1
  • Govind Sangwai
    • 2
  1. 1.Sandip FoundationNashikIndia
  2. 2.Government PolytechnicAurangabadIndia

Personalised recommendations