Advertisement

Electrocardiogram Signal Denoising Using Hybrid Filtering for Cardiovascular Diseases Prediction

  • Sanjay Ghodake
  • Shashikant Ghumbre
  • Sachin Deshmukh
Conference paper

Abstract

One of the leading causes of death worldwide is different types of heart diseases. Such diseases are called cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Thus, the accurate diagnosis of CVD is important at the early stages to prevent from any harm. The traditional methods for CVD diagnosis are inaccurate and expensive. The Electro Cardiogram (ECG) is an inexpensive way for the CVD diagnosis. The ECG data is effectively used with the Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) systems for the accurate and early prediction of CVD. ECG composed of important heart-related beats which can assist in evaluating the behavior of heart. In the recent past, there are several CAD systems designed for CVD diagnosis using the raw ECG signals, and still, the number of research works going on. The CAD system for CVD analysis is composed of three main steps pre-processing, future extractions, and classification. The pre-processing method helps to improve the chances of accurate prediction, as the presence of irrelevant raw data in the original signal may lead to inaccurate outcomes. The outcome of this paper is a practical implementation and evaluation of hybrid filtering method designed for ECG signal denoising.

Keywords

Cardiovascular disease Heart disease Electrocardiogram Computer-aided systems Pre-processing Filtering 

References

  1. 1.
    Ya T, Runjing Z, Fei Z (2009) ECG signal preprocessing based on change step iteration of the LMS adaptive filtering algorithm. 2009 world congress on computer science and information engineering, Los Angeles, CA, USA, pp 155–159Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balasubramaniam D, Nedumaran D (2009) Implementation of ECG signal processing and analysis techniques in digital signal processor based system. MeMeA 2009 – international workshop on medical measurements and applications, May 29–30, Cetraro, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tudosa I, Adochiei NI, Ciobotariu R (2011) New aspects in ECG signal processing using adaptive filters. In: 7th international symposium on advanced topics in electrical engineering (ATEE), Bucharest, RomaniaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ustundag M, Gokbulut M, Sengur A, Ata F (2012) Denoising of weak ECG signals by using wavelet analysis and fuzzy thresholding. Springer Netw Model Anal Health Inform Bioinform 1(4):135–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smital L, Vitek M, Kozumplik J, Provaznik I (2013) Adaptive wavelet wiener filtering of ECG signals. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 60(2):437–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ouali MA, Chafaa K (2013) SVD-based method for ECG denoising. IEEE international conference on computer applications technology (ICCAT), Sousse, Tunisia, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jingwei D, Wenwen J (2015) Design of digital filter on ECG signal processing. Fifth international conference on instrumentation and measurement, computer, communication and control (IMCCC), Qinhuangdao, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smolarik L, Libosvarova A, Mudroncik D, Schreiber P (2012) Non-contact ECG signal processing. 6th IEEE international conference intelligent systems, Sofia, Bulgaria, pp 349–354Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chacko A, Ari S (2012) Denoising of ECG signals using empirical mode decomposition based technique. In: IEEE international conference on advances in engineering, science and management (ICAESM), Nagapattinam, Tamil Nadu, India, pp 6–9Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Qureshi R, Uzair M, Khurshid K (2017) Multistage adaptive filter for ECG signal processing. In: International conference on communication, computing and digital systems (C-CODE), Islamabad, Pakistan, pp 363–368Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Singh O, Sunkaria RK (2017) ECG signal denoising via empirical wavelet transform. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 40(1):219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pandit D, Zhang L, Liu C, Aslam N, Chattopadhyay S, Lim CP (2017) Noise reduction in ECG signals using wavelet transform and dynamic thresholding. In: Bhatti A, Lee K, Garmestani H, Lim C (eds) Emerging trends in neuro engineering and neural computation. Series in bioengineering. Springer, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wissam J, Latif R, Toumanari A, Elouardi A, Hatim A, El Bcharri O (2017) Enhancement and compression of the electrocardiogram signal using the discrete wavelet transform. In: International conference on wireless technologies, embedded and intelligent systems (WITS), pp 1–6Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goldberger AL, Amaral LAN, Glass L, Hausdorff JM et al (2000) Components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation 101(23):e215–e220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sanjay Ghodake
    • 1
  • Shashikant Ghumbre
    • 2
  • Sachin Deshmukh
    • 3
  1. 1.MIT Academy of EngineeringPuneIndia
  2. 2.Government College of Engineering & Research, Avasari KhurdPuneIndia
  3. 3.Department of CSITDr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada UniversityAurangabadIndia

Personalised recommendations