Advertisement

Case Study 1: Dialogue Discussion Group

  • Johan Liljestrand
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter investigates interreligious discussion groups where participants in interreligious projects or activities can meet to talk face-to-face, i.e. listen to each other and address issues that directly or indirectly concern religious pluralism, religion and different life stances. Discussions are not just about talking but are strongly related to relations and networking by relying on rules and norms for the conversations. Another finding was a general observation in our data that religious differences are used as a means for learning about other religions, as compared with community and side-by-side activities which instead were characterised by the emphasis on the commonalities. When differences were highlighted in discussion groups the asymmetry in knowledge between those belonging to a religion and those not belonging to that religion was established. We also found that truth claims were regularly downplayed and that religion instead was presented through personal stories. Another feature was the sharing of common experiences such as being a religious minority in a secularised society.

Keywords

Face-to-face Rules and norms Asymmetries of knowledge Truth claims Stories Common experiences 

References

  1. Egnell, H. 2006. Other Voices: A Study of Christian Feminist Approaches to Religious Plurality East and West. Uppsala: Uppsala universitet.Google Scholar
  2. Ganzevoort, R. 2011. Narrative Approaches. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Practical Theology, ed. B. Miller-McLemore, 214–223. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Heritage, J. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  4. Liljestrand, Johan. 2015. The Church of Sweden as a Contested Actor. A Case Study of the Imam-Debate in Secular and Church Media. Journal of Dialogue Studies 3 (2): 87103.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 2016. Dialogue-Oriented Theologies in the Swedish Context. Working Paper/ReDi. Hamburg University.Google Scholar
  6. McGuire, M. 2008. Lived Religion: Faith and Practice in Everyday Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Pettersson, T. 2011. Sekularisering [Secularisation]. In Religion i Sverige [Religion in Sweden], ed. I. Svanberg and D. Westerlund, 32–38. Stockholm: Dialogos.Google Scholar
  8. Roald, A.-F. 2002. En fallstudie av en dialoggrupp i södra Sverige [A Case Study of a Dialogue Group in Southern Sweden]. In Polemik eller dialog? Nutida religionsteologiska perspektiv bland kristna och muslimer [Polemics or Dialogue? Recent Perspectives On Religion Among Christians and Muslims], ed. M. Stenmark and D. Westerlund. Nora: Nya Doxa.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johan Liljestrand
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cultural StudiesUniversity of GävleGävleSweden

Personalised recommendations