Empowering Incarcerated Parents of Color and Their Families Using Community-Based Participatory Research
Parents of color must navigate a complex system of oppression, which makes incarceration more likely, while also negotiating the challenges of parenthood and family engagement. Unfortunately, traditional scientific approaches that are often used by social scientists to work with these families frequently minimize the importance of the experiential knowledge and expertise present among members of the target population. In addition, traditional approaches rarely return the information gained from the research back to the community and often leave participants, particularly participants of color feeling further disenfranchised. This chapter presents an alternative approach to research that engages the target community at all stages of the research process. This participatory research model encourages a bidirectional flow of information in which the knowledge and benefits gained from the research are given back to the community, and the perspectives of all key stakeholders are taken into consideration throughout research development. This approach to research has been shown to increase the relevance and effectiveness of resulting intervention programs and has been used to empower populations who have been stigmatized, marginalized, and ignored.
KeywordsCommunity-based participatory research Community engagement Community empowerment Incarcerated parents of color Families affected by incarceration
- Adalist-Estrin, A. (2006). Providing support to adolescent children with incarcerated parents. The Prevention Researcher, 13(2), 7–10.Google Scholar
- Alexander, M. (2010). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
- Aguilar, D. N. (2014). Oppression, domination, prison: The mass incarceration of Latino and African American men. The Vermont Connection, 35(2), 13–20.Google Scholar
- Arditti, J. A., & Salva, J. (2013). Parental incarceration and child trauma symptoms in single caregiver homes. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1(11). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9867-2.
- Banks, R. R., Eberhardt, J. L., & Ross, L. (2008). Race, crime, and antidiscrimination. In E. Borgida & S. Fiske (Eds.), Beyond common sense: Psychological science in the courtroom (pp. 3–21). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In M. Gauvain & M. Cole International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed.). Freeman, NY: Oxford, USA.Google Scholar
- Chavez, V., Duran, B., Baker, Q. E., Avila, M. M., & Wallerstein, N. (2003). The dance of race and privilege in community-based participatory research. In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community based participatory research for health (pp. 81–97). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- deVuono-powell, S., Schweidler, C., Walters, A., & Zohrabi, A. (2015). Who pays? The true cost of incarceration on families. Ella Baker Center, Forward Together, Research Action Design. Retrieved from: http://ellabakercenter.org/sites/default/files/downloads/who-pays.pdf.
- Ellis, B. H., & Abdi, S. (2017). Building community resilience to violent extremism through genuine partnerships. American Psychologist, 72(3), 289–300.Google Scholar
- Gee, G.C., & Otiniano Verissimo, A.D. (2016). Racism and behavioral outcomes over the life course. In C.T.H. Liang, & Neville, H.A. (Eds.), The cost of racism for people of color: Contextualizing experiences of discrimination (pp.133-162). Washington DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/14852-007.
- Gitlin, L. N., & Lyons, K. J. (2003). Successful grant writing: Strategies for health and human service professionals (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Haney, C. (2015). Prison overcrowding. In B. L. Cutler & P. A. Zapf (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology. APA handbook of forensic psychology, Vol. 2. Criminal investigation, adjudication, and sentencing outcomes (pp. 415–436). http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/14462-015.
- Ibanez, G. E., Van Oss Marin, B., Flores, S. A., Millett, G., & Diaz, R. M. (2012). General and gay-related racism experienced by Latino gay men. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 15(3), 215–222.Google Scholar
- Johnson, M. E., Brems, C., Mills, M. E., & Eldridge, G. D. (2016). Involving incarcerated individuals in the research process: Perspective of key stakeholders. Action Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1476750316661397.
- Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2003). Field testing integrative negotiations. Peace and conflict. Journal of Peace Psychology, 9(1), 39–68.Google Scholar
- Kramer, K., & The Children of Incarcerated Parents Jail Survey Teams. (2016). Descriptive Overview of Parents, Children and Incarceration in Alameda and San Francisco County Jails. Alameda County Children of Incarcerated Parents Partnership & San Francisco Children of Incarcerated Parents Partnership. San Francisco: Zellerbach Family Foundation. Retrieved from https://sfgov.org/sfreentry/sites/default/files/Documents/CIP%20Jail%20Survey%20-%20Full%20Report%20FINAL%203%2015%2016.pdf.
- Leung, M. W., Yen, I. H., & Minkler, M. (2004). Community based participatory research: A promising approach for increasing epidemiology’s relevance in the 21st century. International Journal of Epidemiology, 33(3), 499–506.Google Scholar
- McClure, H. H., Shortt, J. W., Eddy, J. M., Holmes, A., Van Uum, S., Russell, E., et al. (2015). Associations among mother-child contact, parenting stress, hair cortisol, and mother and child adjustment related to incarceration. In J. Poehlmann-Tynan (Ed.), Children’s contact with incarcerated parents: Implications for policy and intervention. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- McDermott, B. E. (2013). Coercion in research: Are prisoners the only vulnerable population? Journal of American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 41, 8–13.Google Scholar
- McElfish, P. A., Post, J., & Rowland, B. (2016). A social ecological and community-engaged perspective for addressing health disparities among Marshallese in Arkansas. International Journal of Nursing & Clinical Practices, 3, 191. http://dx.doi.org/10.15344/2394-4978/2016/191.
- Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (Eds.). (2003). Community based participatory research for health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Minkler, M. et al., (2008). Promoting healthy public policy through community-based participatory research: Ten case studies. School of Public Health Policylink, Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
- Murphey, D. & Cooper, P. M. (2015), Parents behind bars, what happens to their children? Bethesda, MD: Child Trends. Retrieved from: http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/BTB_23_4K_6.pdf.
- Olphen, J., Freudenberg, N., Galea, S., Palermo, A., & Ritas, C. (2003). Advocating policies to promote community reintegration of drug users leaving jail: a case study of first steps in a policy change campaign guided by community based participatory research. In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 371–389). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Project WHAT! (2016). We’re here and talking: Project WHAT!’s research findings and policy recommendations concerning children of incarcerated parents in San Francisco. Retrieved from: http://communityworkswest.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Project-WHAT-Policy-Report-Final.pdf.
- Reading, W. (2014). Five ways the US prison system is more about perpetuating oppression and not about stemming crime. Retrieved August 21, 2017, from http://everydayfeminism.com/2014/08/us-prison-system.
- Robinson, R. V., David, E. J. R., & Hill, M. (2016). Participatory mixed methods research across cultures. In L. A. Jason & D. S. Glenwick (Eds.), Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research. New York, NY: Oxford.Google Scholar
- Shaefer, J., & Bronheim, S. (2007). Community engagement brings credibility to risk reduction. Promising Practices Series.Google Scholar
- The Pew Charitable Trusts. (2010). Pew Center on the States. Collateral Costs: Incarceration’s Effect on Economic Mobility. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- The Sentencing Project. (2014). Race and punishment: Racial Perceptions of Crime and Support for Punitive Policies. Retrieved August 21, 2017 from http://www.sentencingproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Race-and-Punishment.pdf.
- The Sentencing Project. (2017). Criminal justice facts. Retrieved August 21, 2017, from http://www.sentencingproject.org/criminal-justice-facts/.
- Thompson, B., & Kinne, S. (1990). Social change theory: Applications to community health. In N. Bracht (Ed.), Health promotion at the community level. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Tremblay, M. C., Martin, D. H., Macaulay, A. C., & Pluye, P. (2017). Can we build a social movement theories to develop and improve community-based participatory research? A framework synthesis review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 59(3–4), 333–362.Google Scholar
- US Department of Justice. (2013). Correctional populations in the United States, 2012. (BJS Bulletin December 2013, NCJ 243936). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- US Department of Justice. (2015). Jail inmates at midyear 2014. (BJS Bulletin June 2015, NCJ 248629). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Weiner, J., & McDonald, J.A. (2013). Three models of community-based participatory research. LDI: Issue Brief, 18(5), 1–7.Google Scholar