Advertisement

Understanding Learner Engagement in a Virtual Learning Environment

  • Fedia HliouiEmail author
  • Nadia Aloui
  • Faiez Gargouri
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 941)

Abstract

The past few years has seen the rapid growth of educational data mining approaches for the analysis of data obtained from the virtual learning environments (VLE). However, due to the open and online characteristics of VLEs, vast majority of learners may enroll and drop a course freely, resulting in high dropout rates problem. One of the key elements in reducing dropout rates is the accurate and prompt identification of learners’ engagement level and providing individualized assistance. In this respect, this paper proposes a survival modeling technique to study various factors’ impact on attrition over the Open University in UK. We aim to perceive the learning from a psychological engagement perspective, which is necessary to gain a better understanding of learner motivation and subsequent knowledge and skill acquisition. In this way, we provide an innovative process that may help the tutor to interfere with weak learner at the appropriate time, such as dialog prompts, or learning resources to enhance the learning efficiency. It can help developers to evaluate the VLE effectively and expand system function for future development trend.

Keywords

Educational Data Mining Learner behavior Predicting engagement Virtual learning environment 

References

  1. 1.
    Saadatdoost, R., Sim, A.T.H., Jafarkarimi, H., Mei Hee, J.: Exploring MOOC from education and information systems perspectives: a short literature review. Educ. Rev. 67(4), 505–518 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jiang, S., Kotzias, D.: Assessing the use of social media in massive open online courses arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.05668 (2016)
  3. 3.
    Li, W., Gao, M., Li, H., Xiong, Q., Wen, J., Wu, Z.: Dropout prediction in MOOCs using behavior features and multi-view semi-supervised learning. In: International Conference on Neural Networks (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ramesh, A., Goldwasser, D., Huang, B., Hal Daume, I.I.I., Getoor, L.: Modeling learner engagement in MOOCs using probabilistic soft logic. In: NIPS Workshop on Data Driven Education (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Halawa, S., Greene, D., Mitchell, J.: Dropout prediction in MOOCs using learner activity features. In: Proceedings of the Second European MOOC Stakeholder Summit (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hlioui, F., Aloui, N., Gargouri, F.: Automatic deduction of learners’ profiling rules based on behavioral analysis. In: Conference on Computational Collective Intelligence Technologies and Applications (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Romero, C., Lopez, M.-I., Luna, J.-M., Ventura, S.: Predicting students’ final performance from participation in on-line discussion forums. Comput. Educ. 68, 458–472 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klosgen, W., Zytkow, J.M.: The knowledge discovery process. In: Handbook of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Druagulescu, B., Bucos, M., Vasiu, R.: Predicting assignment submissions in a multi-class classification problem. TEM J. 4(13), 244 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Piech, C., Bassen, J., Huang, J., Ganguli, S., Sahami, M., Guibas, L.J., Sohl-Dickstein, J.: Deep knowledge tracing. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim, J., Guo, P.J., Seaton, D.T., Mitros, P., Gajos, K.Z., Miller, R.C.: Understanding in-video dropouts and interaction peaks in online lecture videos. In: Learning Scale Conference (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tan, M., Shao, P.: Prediction of student dropout in e-learning program through the use of machine learning method. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 10(1), 11–17 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhao, C., Yang, J., Liang, J., Li, C.: Discover learning behavior patterns to predict certification. In: 11th International Conference on Computer Science and Education (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang, T.-Y., Brinton, C.G., Joe-Wong, C., Chiang, M.: Behavior-based grade prediction for MOOCs via time series neural networks. IEEE J. Signal Process. 11(5), 716–728 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tomkins, S., Ramesh, A., Getoor, L.: Predicting post-test performance from online student behavior: a high school MOOC case study. In: International Conference on Educational Data Mining (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li, X., Xie, L., Wang, H.: Grade prediction in MOOCs. In: IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang, W., Yu, H., Miao, C.: Deep model for dropout prediction in MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Crowd Science and Engineering (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liang, J., Li, C., Zheng, L.: Machine learning application in MOOCs: dropout prediction. In: 11th International Conference on Computer Science and Education (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Whitehill, J., Williams, J., Lopez, G., Coleman, C., Reich, J.: Beyond prediction: first steps toward automatic intervention in MOOC student stopout (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fei, M., Yeung, D.-Y.: Temporal models for predicting student dropout in massive open online courses. In: IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kardan, S., Conati, C.: Comparing and combining eye gaze and interface actions for determining user learning with an interactive simulation. In: International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shareghi Najar, A., Mitrovic, A., Neshatian, K.: Eye tracking and studying examples: how novices and advanced learners study SQL examples. J. Comput. Inf. Technol. 23(12), 171–190 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    May, M., Iksal, S., Usener, C.A.: The side effect of learning analytics: an empirical study on e-learning technologies and user privacy. In: International Conference on Computer Supported Education (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ren, Z., Rangwala, H., Johri, A.: Predicting performance on MOOC assessments using multi-regression models arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.02269 (2016)
  25. 25.
    Kuzilek, J., Hlosta, M., Zdrahal, Z.: Open university learning analytics dataset (2016)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Prasser, F., Kohlmayer, F., Lautenschlager, R., Kuhn, K.A.: Arx-a comprehensive tool for anonymizing biomedical data. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings (2014)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bouzayane, S., Saad, I.: A preference ordered classification to leader learners identification in a MOOC. J. Decis. Syst. 26(2), 189–202 (2017)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Romero, C., Ventura, S., Garcia, E.: Data mining in course management systems: moodle case study and tutorial. Comput. Educ. 51(1), 368–384 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cohen, W.W.: Fast effective rule induction. In: Machine Learning Proceedings (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Multimedia Information System and Advanced Computing LaboratoryUniversity of SfaxSfaxTunisia

Personalised recommendations