In recent years, imaging methods have started to be used for scientific purposes as well as diagnostic purposes as technology develops. Possibilities that have revolutionary quality have been presented for scientific researches within the features that are operating principle of micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), image quality, and three-dimensional reconstruction. In bone researches, samples in certain size are transferred to the computer environment without degenerating structural integrity and being exposed to chemical processing and microarchitecture which can be examined in every axis. Many bone analysis can be performed with conventional histomorphological methods by using micro-CT. Stretching tests can be applied to the samples such as analysis of advanced finite element by using micro-CT images.
Many parameters such as pathological tissues formed during healing, following either normal bone tissue or notably trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), bone volume (BV), total tissue volume (TV), trabecular bone ratio (BV/TV), structural model index that shows numeric characteristics of trabecular as 3D (SMI), trabecular bone connections, number of trabecular nodes in each tissue volume (N.Nd/TV), and bone mineral density, belong to callus tissue which can be counted fast and in a secure manner.
Fracture Bone healing Callus Micro CT
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
All figures in this chapter were scanned and reconstructed with Skyscan 1275 (Skyscan, Kontich, Belgium) in Ankara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Micro-CT Laboratory which was founded by Ankara University Research Fund (Project No:17A0234001) and belongs to the courtesy of Orhan, K., Bilecenoglu B., and Ocak. M.
Moore KL, Dalley AF, Agur AM. Clinically oriented anatomy. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.Google Scholar
Standring S. Gray’s anatomy E-book: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015.Google Scholar
Buckwalter JA, Glimcher MJ, Cooper RR, Recker R. Bone biology. I: structure, blood supply, cells, matrix, and mineralization. Instr Course Lect. 1996;45:371–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Buckwalter JA, Einhorn TA, Marsh J. Bone and joint healing. Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins; 2001. p. 245–71.Google Scholar
Buckwalter JA, Glimcher MJ, Cooper RR, Recker R. Bone biology. II: formation, form, modeling, remodeling, and regulation of cell function. Instr Course Lect. 1996;45:387–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Fanuscu MI, Chang TL. Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cadaver bone: microstructural data from maxilla and mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15(2):213–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller R, Van Campenhout H, Van Damme B, Van Der Perre G, Dequeker J, Hildebrand T, et al. Morphometric analysis of human bone biopsies: a quantitative structural comparison of histological sections and micro-computed tomography. Bone. 1998;23(1):59–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundnes O, Reikeras O. The role of hematoma and periosteal sealing for fracture healing in rats. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993;64(1):47–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Wiel HE, Lips P, Nauta J, Patka P, Haarman HJ, Teule GJ. Loss of bone in the proximal part of the femur following unstable fractures of the leg. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76(2):230–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsson MK, Nilsson BE, Obrant KJ. Bone mineral loss after lower extremity trauma. 62 cases followed for 15-38 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993;64(3):362–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butz F, Ogawa T, Chang T-L, Nishimura I. Three-dimensional bone-implant integration profiling using micro-computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21(5):687–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Morinaga K, Kido H, Sato A, Watazu A, Matsuura M. Chronological changes in the ultrastructure of titanium-bone interfaces: analysis by light microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and micro-computed tomography. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009;11(1):59–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Oosterwyck H, Duyck J, Sloten JV, Perre GV, Jansen J, Wevers M, et al. The use of microfocus computerized tomography as a new technique for characterizing bone tissue around oral implants. J Oral Implantol. 2000;26(1):5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartmell S, Huynh K, Lin A, Nagaraja S, Guldberg R. Quantitative microcomputed tomography analysis of mineralization within three-dimensional scaffolds in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004;69(1):97–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollister SJ, Lin C, Saito E, Lin C, Schek R, Taboas J, et al. Engineering craniofacial scaffolds. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2005;8(3):162–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dursun E, Dursun CK, Eratalay K, Orhan K, Celik HH, Tözüm TF. Do porous titanium granule grafts affect bone microarchitecture at augmented maxillary sinus sites? A pilot split-mouth human study. Implant Dent. 2015;24(4):427–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shefelbine SJ, Simon U, Claes L, Gold A, Gabet Y, Bab I, et al. Prediction of fracture callus mechanical properties using micro-CT images and voxel-based finite element analysis. Bone. 2005;36(3):480–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosemark P, Isaksson H, McDonald MM, Little DG, Tägil M. Augmentation of autologous bone graft by a combination of bone morphogenic protein and bisphosphonate increased both callus volume and strength. Acta Orthop. 2013;84(1):106–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds DG, Hock C, Shaikh S, Jacobson J, Zhang X, Rubery PT, et al. Micro-computed tomography prediction of biomechanical strength in murine structural bone grafts. J Biomech. 2007;40(14):3178–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan EF, Mason ZD, Chien KB, Pfeiffer AJ, Barnes GL, Einhorn TA, et al. Micro-computed tomography assessment of fracture healing: relationships among callus structure, composition, and mechanical function. Bone. 2009;44(2):335–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang X, Ricciardi BF, Hernandez-Soria A, Shi Y, Camacho NP, Bostrom MP. Callus mineralization and maturation are delayed during fracture healing in interleukin-6 knockout mice. Bone. 2007;41(6):928–36.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyman JS, Munoz S, Jadhav S, Mansour A, Yoshii T, Mundy GR, et al. Quantitative measures of femoral fracture repair in rats derived by micro-computed tomography. J Biomech. 2009;42(7):891–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen JS, Laib A, Koller B, Prohaska S, Mosekilde L, Gowin W. Stereological measures of trabecular bone structure: comparison of 3D micro computed tomography with 2D histological sections in human proximal tibial bone biopsies. J Microsc. 2005;218(2):171–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar