Advertisement

Science Behind Cosmetics and Skin Care

  • Becky S. Li
  • John H. Cary
  • Howard I. MaibachEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Women and men worldwide use an abundance of skin care and cosmetic products, in pursuit of cleanliness with soaps and shampoos, or everlasting youth with creams and serums. No matter what age, location or socioeconomic background, we are all exposed to the widespread cosmetics industry. The global cosmetic market was worth $460 billion in 2014 and is estimated to reach $675 billion by 2020. While marketing and advertising efforts have forged a path for the industry’s continued growth, this momentum has not translated to equally refreshed regulatory practices in some parts of the world. This chapter reviews the regulatory status of cosmetics, adverse event reporting and studies attempting to link cosmetics with contact dermatitis. It aims to set the foundation for the emergence of nanocosmetics.

Keywords

Cosmetics Cosmetic regulation Cosmetic research FDCA VCRP CIR RIFM PCPSA Contact dermatitis Adverse effects Nanocosmetics 

References

  1. 1.
    Wood L. Research and Markets: Global Cosmetics Market 2015–2020: Market was $460 Billion in 2014 and is Estimated to Reach $675 Billion by 2020. [online] Businesswire.com; 2015. Available at: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20150727005524/en/Research-Markets-Global-Cosmetics-Market-2015-2020-Market. Accessed 11 Apr. 2018.
  2. 2.
    Merrill R. FDA regulatory requirements as tort standards. J. L. & POL’Y. 2004;12(1):552–3.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Termini RB, Tressler LB. American beauty: an analytical view of the past and current effectiveness of cosmetic safety regulations and future direction. Food Drug Law J. 2008;63(1):257–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boyer IJ, Bergfeld WF, Heldreth B, Fiume MM, Gill LJ. The cosmetic ingredient review program-expert safety assessments of cosmetic ingredients in an open forum. Int J Toxicol. 2017; 36 (5_suppl2):5S–13S.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581817717646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Api AM, Belsito D, Bruze M, Cadby P, Calow P, Dagli ML, Dekant W, Ellis G, Fryer AD, Fukayama M, Griem P, Hickey C, Kromidas L, Lalko JF, Liebler DC, Miyachi Y, Politano VT, Renskers K, Ritacco G, Salvito D, Schultz TW, Sipes IG, Smith B, Vitale D, Wilcox DK. Criteria for the research institute for fragrance materials, Inc. (RIFM) safety evaluation process for fragrance ingredients. Food Chem Toxicol, 82 (Supplement):S1–S19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2014.11.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kwa M, Welty LJ, Xu S. Adverse events reported to the us food and drug administration for cosmetics and personal care products. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(8):1202–4.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2762.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mowry JB, Spyker DA, Brooks DE, Zimmerman A, Schauben JL. 2015 Annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers’ National Poison Data System (NPDS): 33rd annual report. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2016;54(10):924–1109.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2016.1245421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Adams RM, Maibach HI. A five-year study of cosmetic reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985;13(6):1062–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(85)70258-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Groot AC. Contact allergy to cosmetics: causative ingredients. Contact Dermatitis. 1987;17(1):26–34.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1987.tb02640.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eiermann HJ, Larsen W, Maibach HI, Taylor JS. Prospective study of cosmetic reactions: 1977–1980. North American Contact Dermatitis Group. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1982;6(5):909–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(82)70080-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nielsen NH, Menne T. Allergic contact sensitization in an unselected Danish population. The Glostrup allergy study, Denmark. Acta Derm Venereol. 1992;72(6):456–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Romaguera C, Camarasa JM, Alomar A, Grimalt F. Patch tests with allergens related to cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis. 1983;9(2):167–8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1983.tb04346.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lachapelle J-M, Maibach HI, editors. Patch testing and prick testing: a practical guide official publication of the ICDRG. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Menkart J. An analysis of adverse reactions to cosmetics. Cutis. 1979;24(6):599–662.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Biebl KA, Warshaw EM. Allergic contact dermatitis to cosmetics. Dermatol Clin. 2006;24(2):215–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2006.01.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Warshaw EM, Buchholz HJ, Belsito DV, Maibach HI, Fowler JF Jr, Rietschel RL, Zug KA, Mathias CG, Pratt MD, Sasseville D, Storrs FJ, Taylor JS, Deleo VA, Marks JG Jr. Allergic patch test reactions associated with cosmetics: retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2001-2004. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60(1):23–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2008.07.056.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Park ME, Zippin JH. Allergic contact dermatitis to cosmetics. Dermatol Clin. 2014;32(1):1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2013.09.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holly EA, Bracci PM, Hong MK, Mueller BA, Preston-Martin S. West Coast study of childhood brain tumours and maternal use of hair-colouring products. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2002;16(3):226–35.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3016.2002.00420.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sontag JM. Carcinogenicity of substituted-benzenediamines (phenylenediamines) in rats and mice. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1981;66(3):591–602.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/66.3.591.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    La Vecchia C, Tavani A. Epidemiological evidence on hair dyes and the risk of cancer in humans. Eur J Cancer Prev. 1995;4(1):31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nohynek GJ, Fautz R, Benech-Kieffer F, Toutain H. Toxicity and human health risk of hair dyes. Food Chem Toxicol. 2004;42(4):517–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2003.11.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hougaard KS, Hannerz H, Bonde JP, Feveile H, Burr H. The risk of infertility among hairdressers. Five-year follow-up of female hairdressers in a Danish national registry. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(12):3122–6.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del160.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ronda E, Garcia AM, Sanchez-Paya J, Moen BE. Menstrual disorders and subfertility in Spanish hairdressers. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;147(1):61–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.07.020.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Harling M, Schablon A, Schedlbauer G, Dulon M, Nienhaus A. Bladder cancer among hairdressers: a meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med. 2010;67(5):351–8.  https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2009.050195.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Duong A, Steinmaus C, McHale CM, Vaughan CP, Zhang L. Reproductive and developmental toxicity of formaldehyde: a systematic review. Mutat Res. 2011;728(3):118–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2011.07.003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hannigan JH, Bowen SE. Reproductive toxicology and teratology of abused toluene. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2010;56(2):184–200.  https://doi.org/10.3109/19396360903377195.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ono A, Kawashima K, Sekita K, Hirose A, Ogawa Y, Saito M, Naito K, Yasuhara K, Kaneko T, Furuya T, Inoue T, Kurokawa Y. Toluene inhalation induced epididymal sperm dysfunction in rats. Toxicology. 1999;139(3):193–205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-483X(99)00120-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gospe SM Jr, Zhou SS. Toluene abuse embryopathy: longitudinal neurodevelopmental effects of prenatal exposure to toluene in rats. Reprod Toxicol. 1998;12(2):119–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6238(97)00128-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ahmed P, Jaakkola JJ. Exposure to organic solvents and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(10):2751–7.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Boberg J, Taxvig C, Christiansen S, Hass U. Possible endocrine disrupting effects of parabens and their metabolites. Reprod Toxicol. 2010;30(2):301–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2010.03.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Crinnion WJ. Toxic effects of the easily avoidable phthalates and parabens. Altern Med Rev. 2010;15(3):190–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Park CJ, Nah WH, Lee JE, Oh YS, Gye MC. Butyl paraben-induced changes in DNA methylation in rat epididymal spermatozoa. Andrologia. 2012;44(Suppl 1):187–93.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.2011.01162.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Khanna S, Darbre PD. Parabens enable suspension growth of MCF-10A immortalized, non-transformed human breast epithelial cells. J Appl Toxicol. 2013;33(5):378–82.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.2753.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wrobel A, Gregoraszczuk EL. Effects of single and repeated in vitro exposure of three forms of parabens, methyl-, butyl- and propylparabens on the proliferation and estradiol secretion in MCF-7 and MCF-10A cells. Pharmacol Rep. 2013;65(2):484–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1734-1140(13)71024-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Konduracka E, Krzemieniecki K, Gajos G. Relationship between everyday use cosmetics and female breast cancer. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2014;124(5):264–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Baran R, Maibach HI, editors. Textbook of cosmetic dermatology. 5th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2017.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Barel AO, Paye M, Maibach HI, editors. Handbook of cosmetic science and technology. 4th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2014.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Berardesca E, Elsner P, Wilhelm K-P, Maibach HI, editors. Bioengineering of the skin: methods and instrumentation. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1995.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Elsner P, Berardesca E, Maibach HI, editors. Bioengineering of the skin: water and the stratum corneum. Boca Raton: CRC; 1994.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Elsner P, Berardesca E, Wilhelm K-P, Maibach HI, editors. Bioengineering of the skin: skin biomechanics. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fluhr J, Elsner P, Berardesca E, Maibach HI, editors. Bioengineering of the skin. Water and the stratum corneum. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Shai A, Maibach HI, Baran R, editors. Handbook of cosmetic skin care. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sivamani RK, Jagdeo JR, Elsner P, Maibach HI, editors. Cosmeceuticals and active cosmetics. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2016.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wilhelm K-P, Elsner P, Berardesca E, Maibach HI, editors. Bioengineering of the skin: skin imaging & analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Informa; 2007.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wilhelm K-P, Elsner P, Berardesca E, Maibach HI, editors. Bioengineering of the skin: skin surface imaging and analysis. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1996.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lazzarini R, Duarte I, de Farias DC, Santos CA, Tsai AI. Frequency and main sites of allergic contact dermatitis caused by nail varnish. Dermatitis. 2008;19(6):319–22.  https://doi.org/10.2310/6620.2008.08009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rietschel RL, Warshaw EM, Sasseville D, Fowler JF, DeLeo VA, Belsito DV, Taylor JS, Storrs FJ, Mathias CG, Maibach HI, Marks JG, Zug KA, Pratt M, North American Contact Dermatitis Group. Common contact allergens associated with eyelid dermatitis: data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2003–2004 study period. Dermatitis. 2007;18(2):78–81.  https://doi.org/10.2310/6620.2007.06041.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rietschel RL, Fowler JF, editors. Fisher’s contact dermatitis. 6th ed. Hamilton: BC Decker; 2008.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Brandrup F. Nickel eyelid dermatitis from an eyelash curler. Contact Dermatitis. 1991;25(1):77.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1991.tb01788.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Guin JD. Eyelid dermatitis: experience in 203 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47(5):755–65.  https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2002.122736.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Le Coz CJ, Leclere JM, Arnoult E, Raison-Peyron N, Pons-Guiraud A, Vigan M, Members of R-G. Allergic contact dermatitis from shellac in mascara. Contact Dermatitis. 2002;46(3):149–52.  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.460304.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Shaw T, Oostman H, Rainey D, Storrs F. A rare eyelid dermatitis allergen: shellac in a popular mascara. Dermatitis. 2009;20(6):341–5.  https://doi.org/10.2310/6620.2009.09009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Stay healthy and safe while giving manicures and pedicures: A guide for nail salon workers. (n.d.b). Retrieved from: www.osha.gov/Publications/3542nail-salon-workers-guide.pdf.
  54. 54.
    Jacob SE, Castanedo-Tardan MP. A diagnostic pearl in allergic contact dermatitis to fragrances: the atomizer sign. Cutis. 2008;82(5):317–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Warshaw EM, Furda LM, Maibach HI, Rietschel RL, Fowler JF Jr, Belsito DV, Zug KA, DeLeo VA, Marks JG Jr, Mathias CG, Pratt MD, Sasseville D, Storrs FJ, Taylor JS. Anogenital dermatitis in patients referred for patch testing: retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1994-2004. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(6):749–55.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.144.6.749.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Bhate K, Landeck L, Gonzalez E, Neumann K, Schalock PC. Genital contact dermatitis: a retrospective analysis. Dermatitis. 2010;21(6):317–20.  https://doi.org/10.2310/6620.2010.10048.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kugler K, Brinkmeier T, Frosch PJ, Uter W. Anogenital dermatoses—allergic and irritative causative factors. Analysis of IVDK data and review of the literature. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2005;3(12):979–86.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1610-0387.2005.05763.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Vermaat H, Smienk F, Rustemeyer T, Bruynzeel DP, Kirtschig G. Anogenital allergic contact dermatitis, the role of spices and flavour allergy. Contact Dermatitis. 2008;59(4):233–7.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01417.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Vermaat H, van Meurs T, Rustemeyer T, Bruynzeel DP, Kirtschig G. Vulval allergic contact dermatitis due to peppermint oil in herbal tea. Contact Dermatitis. 2008;58(6):364–5.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01270.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ames BN, McCann J, Yamasaki E. Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/mammalian-microsome mutagenicity test. Mutat Res. 1975;31(6):347–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1161(75)90046-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    National Toxicology Program. Final report on carcinogens: Background document for formaldehyde. 2010 Retrieved from: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/roc/twelfth/2009/November/Formaldehyde_BD_Final.pdf.
  62. 62.
    Nicolopoulou-Stamati P, Hens L, Sasco AJ. Cosmetics as endocrine disruptors: are they a health risk? Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2015;16(4):373–83.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-016-9329-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Health hazards in nail salons. (n.d.a). Retrieved from: www.osha.gov/SLTC/nailsalons/chemicalhazards.html.
  64. 64.
    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Health hazards in nail salons. 2013 Retrieved from: www.osha.gov/SLTC/nailsalons/chemicalhazards.html.
  65. 65.
    Nedorost S, Wagman A. Positive patch-test reactions to gold: patients’ perception of relevance and the role of titanium dioxide in cosmetics. Dermatitis. 2005;16(2):67–70 (quiz 55–66).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Pak VM, McCauley LA, Pinto-Martin J. Phthalate exposures and human health concerns: a review and implications for practice. AAOHN J. 2011;59(5):228–33.  https://doi.org/10.3928/08910162-20110426-01 (quiz 234–225).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Pak VM, Powers M, Liu J. Occupational chemical exposures among cosmetologists: risk of reproductive disorders. Workplace Health Saf. 2013;61(12):522–8.  https://doi.org/10.3928/21650799-20131121-01 (quiz 529).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Rastogi SC. Analytical control of preservative labelling on skin creams. Contact Dermatitis. 2000;43(6):339–43.  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.043006339.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Research and Markets: Global Cosmetics Market 2015–2020: Market was $460 Billion in 2014 and is Estimated to Reach $675 Billion by 2020 [database on the Internet] 2015. Available from: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20150727005524/en/Research-Markets-Global-Cosmetics-Market-2015-2020-Market. Accessed Nov 2017.
  70. 70.
    Roelofs C, Azaroff LS, Holcroft C, Nguyen H, Doan T. Results from a community-based occupational health survey of Vietnamese-American nail salon workers. J Immigr Minor Health. 2008;10(4):353–61.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-007-9084-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: volume 57. Occupational exposures of hairdressers and barbers and personal use of hair colourants; some hair dyes, cosmetic colourants, industrial dyestuffs and aromatic amines. 1993 Retrieved from http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol57/volume57.pdf.
  72. 72.
    World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: volume 88. Formaldehyde, 2-butoxyethanol and 1-tert-butoxypropan-2-ol. 2006 Retrieved from: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol88/mono88.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Becky S. Li
    • 1
  • John H. Cary
    • 2
  • Howard I. Maibach
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Howard University College of MedicineWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Louisiana State University School of MedicineNew OrleansUSA
  3. 3.School of Medicine, Department of DermatologyUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations