Advertisement

Water Resources Management in California

  • Samuel Sandoval-SolisEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

California has an intense history of water management and resources manipulation. The main drivers for some of the largest water management infrastructure projects are (1) a spatial mismatch between where most of the precipitation falls on the state and where most of the water is needed and (2) a temporal mismatch of precipitation during winter months and the agriculture season on summer. This chapter describes the legal framework and water allocation systems to manage surface water, groundwater, and environmental water that are guiding California toward adopting an integrated water resources management framework.

Keywords

Groundwater management Water rights Water allocation SGMA 

References

  1. Bork KS, Krovoza JF, Katz JV, Moyle PB (2011) The rebirth of California fish & game code section 5937: water for fish. UCDL Rev 45:809Google Scholar
  2. Clean Water Act (2008) Clean Water Act. EPA’s OfficeGoogle Scholar
  3. Congress US (1973) Endangered Species Act. US Code 16:1534–1544Google Scholar
  4. Corcoran K (2018) California’s economy is now the 5th-biggest in the world, and has overtaken the United Kingdom. https://www.businessinsider.com/california-economy-ranks-5th-in-the-world-beating-the-uk-2018-5. Accessed Sept 2018
  5. DWR (2018) State water project. Department of Water Resources. https://water.ca.gov/Programs/State-Water-Project. 2018
  6. Forbes (2017) California gross state product. https://www.forbes.com/places/ca/. Accessed Sept 2018
  7. GWP (2000) Integrated water resources management, vol 4. Global Water PartnershipGoogle Scholar
  8. Hanak E et al (2011) Managing California’s water: from conflict to reconciliation. Public Policy Institute of California, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  9. Kadir T, Huang G (2015) Unimpaired flows vs. natural flows to the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta: what’s the difference? In: California water and environmental modeling forum, Folsom, California. Retrieved from http://www.cwemf.org/AMPresentations/2015/Kadir_NaturalFlow.pdf
  10. Kocis TN, Dahlke HE (2017) Availability of high-magnitude streamflow for groundwater banking in the Central Valley, California. Environ Res Lett 12:084009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Littleworth AL, Garner EL (2007) Chapter 3: Surface water rights. In: California water II. Solano Press, Point Arena, pp 37–67Google Scholar
  12. Loucks DP, Van Beek E, Stedinger JR, Dijkman JPM, Villars MT (2005) Water resources systems planning and management; an introduction to methods, models and applications. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, DelftGoogle Scholar
  13. Olshansky RB (1996) The California Environmental Quality Act and local planning. J Am Plan Assoc 62:313–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. PPIC (2016) Water for the environment. Public Policy Institute of California, Water Policy CenterGoogle Scholar
  15. Sax JL (1970) The public trust doctrine in natural resource law: effective judicial intervention. Mich Law Rev 68:471–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tarlock AD, Tippy R (1969) Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968. Cornell L Rev 55:707Google Scholar
  17. Trelease FJ (1957) The concept of reasonable beneficial use in the law of surface streams. Wyo LJ 12:1Google Scholar
  18. USBR (2018) Central valley project. US. Bureau of ReclamationGoogle Scholar
  19. Wurbs RA (2006) Methods for developing naturalized monthly flows at gaged and ungaged sites. J Hydrol Eng 11:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zektser S, Loáiciga HA, Wolf JT (2005) Environmental impacts of groundwater overdraft: selected case studies in the southwestern United States. Environ Geol 47:396–404.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-004-1164-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Land, Air and Water ResourcesUniversity of California, DavisDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations