Advertisement

Institutional Investments and Responsible Investing

  • Ria Sinha
  • Manipadma Datta
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance book series (SIF)

Abstract

This chapter is designed to provide insights on the pertinence of responsible investing in both developed and developing economies in light of the international deliberations on sustainability and sustainable development. Responsible investing presents a strong business case for institutional investors to merge ethics with profitability. However, to develop a strong business case, it is imperative to dive deeply into the various forms of responsible investing, and the recent trends, drivers and barriers associated with it. Institutional investors pertain to various environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) evaluation methodologies, subject to the type of financial instruments and availability of ESG data. These assessments help investors to undertake informed decisions and lead to ESG integration in several asset classes such as listed equity, fixed income, hedge funds and private equity. Although the extent of integration varies considerably across geographical domains and asset classes, there is an increasing recognition of better returns from ESG diversified portfolios. Several asset management companies (AMCs) are adhering to varied ESG integration approaches in developed economies. These approaches clearly cater to different application, research and management levels to be categorized as fundamentalist, believer, cautionary, discretion, statistician and transition-focused. Despite the rising signatories to the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (UNPRI), there are several deterrents which affect the growth of responsible investing. The reflective and exploratory approach undertaken in this chapter is likely to benefit students, academicians and professionals working in the domain.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This book chapter is funded out of a research project implemented by the National Science Center Poland under the grant OPUS13 no UMO-2017/25/B/HS4/02172.

References

  1. AIMA and Cayman Alternative Investment Summit. (2018). From Niche to Mainstream: Responsible Investment and Hedge Funds. Retrieved from https://www.aima.org/educate/aima-research/from-niche-to-mainstream-esg.html.
  2. Allianz GI Global Solutions. (2015). ESG in Equities. Retrieved from www.allianzgi.com.
  3. Aragon, G. O., & Ferson, W. E. (2006). Portfolio Performance Evaluation. Foundations and Trends in Finance, 2(2), 83–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barth, M. E., Beaver, W. H., & Landsman, W. R. (2001). The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature for Financial Accounting Standard Setting: Another View. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauer, R., Koedijk, K., & Otten, R. (2005). International Evidence on Ethical Mutual Fund Performance and Investment Style. Journal of Banking and Finance, 29(7), 1751–1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Black, F., Jense, M., & Scholes, M. (1972). The Capital Assets Pricing Model: Some Empirical Results. In Studies in the Theory of Capital Market. London: Prager Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Boaventura, J. M. G., Silva, R. S., & Bandeira-de-Mello, R. (2012). Corporate Financial Performance and Corporate Social Performance: Methodological Development and the Theoretical Contribution of Empirical Studies. Revista Contabilidade & Financas, 23(60), 232–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brundtland Commission. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Retrieved from www.un-documents.net.
  9. Cakici, N., & Tan, S. (2014). Size, Value, and Momentum in Developed Country Equity Returns: Macroeconomic and Liquidity Exposures. Journal of International Money & Finance, 44, 179–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carles, P. G., Sainz, J., Otamendi, J., & Doncel, L. M. (2009). Different Risk-Adjusted Fund Performance Measures: A Comparison. Economics, 54, 1–33. Retrieved from www.scs-europe.net.
  11. Derwall, J., Guenster, N., & Koedijk, K. (2005). The Eco-efficiency Premium Puzzle. Financial Analysts Journal, 61(2), 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dimson, E., Karakas, O., & Li, X. (2012). Active Ownership, 1–48. Retrieved from www.hbs.edu.
  13. Edmans, A. (2011). Does the Stock Market Fully Value Intangibles? Employee Satisfaction and Equity Prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 101, 621–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ericsson, J., & Karlsson, S. (2004). Choosing Factors in a Multifactor Asset Pricing Model: A Bayesian Approach. SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, 524. Retrieved from www.swopec.hhs.se.
  15. Gompers, P. A., Ishii, J. L., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate Governance and Equity Prices. Wharton Working Paper Series, 1–68. Retrieved from www.fic.wharton.upenn.edu.
  16. Hassel, L. G., & Semenova, N. (2013). The Added Value of Environmental, Social and Governance Performance and Sustainable and Responsible Investment on Company and Portfolio Levels – What Can We Learn from Research? In CSR and Beyond – A Nordic Perspective. Oslo, Norway: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.Google Scholar
  17. Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2015). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Investment Recommendations: Analysts’ Perceptions and Shifting Institutional Logics. Strategic Management Journal, 36(7), 1053–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Karagiorgos, T. (2010). CSR and Financial Performance: An Empirical Analysis on Greek Companies. European Research Studies, 13(2), 86–108.Google Scholar
  19. Mercer. (2009). Shedding Light on Responsible Investment: Approaches, Returns and Impacts. Retrieved from http://www.sustainablefinance.ch/upload/cms/user/Shedding_light_on_responsible_investment_free_version.pdf.
  20. Morgan Stanley. (2018). Sustainable Signals: Asset Owners Embrace Sustainability. Retrieved from https://www.morganstanley.com/assets/pdfs/sustainable-signals-asset-owners-2018-survey.pdf.
  21. Nham, P. T., Tran, H. C., & Nguyen, T. H. (2004). Impact of Firms Environmental Performance on Its Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam’s Small and Medium Manufacturing Firms. JSPS Asian CORE Program, Nagoya University and VNU University of Economics and Business, 1–17.Google Scholar
  22. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, M. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Perold, A. F. (2004). Capital Asset Pricing Model. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(3), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Phillips, H., & North Investment Management. (2007). Does Socially Responsible Investing Hurt Investment Returns? Retrieved from https://www.financite.be/sites/default/files/references/files/2177.pdf.
  25. Rathner, S. (2011). The Performance of SRI Funds: A Meta-analysis, 1–13. Retrieved from www.uni-salzburg.at.
  26. Rathner, S. (2013). The Relative Performance of SRI Funds: New Evidence from Austria. Working Papers in Economics and Finance. University of Salzburg, 1–28. Retrieved from www.uni-salzburg.at.
  27. Renneboog, L., Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2007). Socially Responsible Investments: Methodology, Risk Exposure and Performance. ECGI Working Paper, 1–51.Google Scholar
  28. Roll, R. (1977). A Critique of the Asset Pricing Theory’s Tests Part I: On Past and Potential Testability of the Theory. Journal of Financial Economics, 4(2), 129–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Semenova, N., & Hassel, L. G. (2008). Industry Risk Moderates the Relation Between Environmental and Financial Performance. Sustainable Investment Research Platform Working Papers, 1–28.Google Scholar
  30. Semenova, N., Hassel, L. G., & Nilsson, H. (2010). The Value Relevance of Environmental and Social Performance: Evidence from Swedish SIX 300 Companies. SIRP Working Paper, 1–20.Google Scholar
  31. Sinha, R., & Datta, M. (2014). Problems and Prospect of Developing a Proper Mechanism for Measuring Impact of ESG factors on Business Finance: Developments in India and Other Countries. Indian Accounting Review (IAR), 18(2), 54–75.Google Scholar
  32. Statman, M. (2000). Socially Responsible Mutual Funds. Association for Investment Management and Research, 56(3), 30–39.Google Scholar
  33. Sustainalytics and IRRC Institute. (2017). How Investors Integrate ESG: A Typology of Approaches. Retrieved from https://irrcinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/FinalIRRCiReport_HowInvestorsIntegrateESG.ATypologyofApproaches.pdf.
  34. Tirole, J. (2001). Corporate Governance. Econometrics, 69(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. UNPRI. (2014). Integrating ESG in Private Equity. Retrieved from https://www.unpri.org/download?ac=252.
  36. UNPRI. (2016). A Practical Guide to ESG Integration for Equity Investing. Retrieved from https://www.unpri.org/listed-equity/a-practical-guide-to-esg-integration-for-equity-investing/10.article.
  37. Vishwanathan, P., & Heugens, P. (2008). Assessing the ‘Mechanisms Turn’ in Corporate Social and Financial Performance Studies: A Meta Analysis, 1–57. Retrieved from www.portal.uc3m.es.
  38. World Bank. (2015). What Are Green Bonds? Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/400251468187810398/What-are-green-bonds.
  39. Yang, F. J., Lin, C. W., & Chang, Y. N. (2010). The Linkage Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance. African Journal of Business Management, 4(4), 406–413.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ria Sinha
    • 1
  • Manipadma Datta
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Business and SustainabilityTERI School of Advanced StudiesNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations