Virtual and Augmented Reality Interfaces in Shared Game Environments: A Novel Approach

  • Francesco De PaceEmail author
  • Federico Manuri
  • Andrea Sanna
  • Davide Zappia
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 273)


Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) have been usually addressed as two separated worlds and recent studies try to address the problem of merging the AR and VR applications into a single “environment”, providing a system that relies on both paradigms. The constant release of new hardware interfaces for both wearable AR and Immersive VR opens up new possibilities for the gaming area and many others. However, even if there are researches that explore the usage of AR and VR in the same application, videogames are deployed for one environment or the other depending on their strengths and flaws and the type of experience they can offer to the player, in order to exalt the peculiarities of the chosen medium. A novel approach would be to provide a multiplayer system that enables the users to play the same (or similar) experience through either an AR or VR interface: the player could freely choose the interface, based on several factors such as hardware availability, environment, physical limitations or personal preferences. In this paper, a preliminary study on a multiplayer game system for both AR and VR interfaces is proposed. A chess game experience is provided and a comparison through a System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire allowed to establish if both interfaces provided a satisfactory game experience and to highlight both hardware limitations and further interface enhancements.


Augmented reality Virtual reality Shared environment 


  1. 1.
    Milgram, P., Kishino, F.: A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 77(12), 1321–1329 (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vogel, H.L.: Entertainment Industry Economics: A Guide for Financial Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bates, J.: Virtual reality, art, and entertainment. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 1(1), 133–138 (1992)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stapleton, C., Hughes, C., Moshell, M., Micikevicius, P., Altman, M.: Applying mixed reality to entertainment. Computer 35(12), 122–124 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Azuma, R.T: A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 6(4), 355–385 (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Newby, G.B.: Virtual reality and the entertainment industry. Bull. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 21(1), 20–21 (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Loeffler, C.E.: Distributed virtual reality: applications for education, entertainment and industry. Telektronikk 89, 83 (1993)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Woodfield, R.: Virtual reality, videogames and the story of art (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Giles, W., Schroeder, R., Cleal, B.: Virtual reality and the future of interactive games. In: Warnecke, H.J., Bullinger, H.J. (eds.) Virtual Reality 1994, pp. 377–391. Springer, Heidelberg (1994). Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gálvez, A., Iglesias, A.: Videogames and virtual reality as effective edutainment tools. In: Kim, T.-h., Lee, Y.-h., Kang, B.-H., Ślęzak, D. (eds.) FGIT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6485, pp. 564–576. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burkle, M., Magee, M.: Virtual learning: videogames and virtual reality in education. In: Digital Tools for Seamless Learning, pp. 325–344. IGI Global (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schmalstieg, D.: Augmented reality techniques in games. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, pp. 176–177. IEEE Computer Society (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Szalavári, Z., Eckstein, E., Gervautz, M.: Collaborative gaming in augmented reality. In: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, pp. 195–204. ACM (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Piekarski, W., Thomas, B.: ARQuake: the outdoor augmented reality gaming system. Commun. ACM 45(1), 36–38 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cheok, A.D., et al.: Human Pacman: a mobile, wide-area entertainment system based on physical, social, and ubiquitous computing. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 8(2), 71–81 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lindt, I., Ohlenburg, J., Pankoke-Babatz, U., Prinz, W., Ghellal, S.: Combining multiple gaming interfaces in epidemic menace. In CHI 2006 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 213–218. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ranade, S., Zhang, M., Al-Sada, M., Urbani, J., Nakajima, T.: Clash tanks: an investigation of virtual and augmented reality gaming experience. In: 2017 Tenth International Conference on Mobile Computing and Ubiquitous Network (ICMU), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vera, L., Gimeno, J., Casas, S., García-Pereira, I., Portalés, C.: A hybrid virtual-augmented serious game to improve driving safety awareness. In: Cheok, A.D., Inami, M., Romão, T. (eds.) ACE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10714, pp. 293–310. Springer, Cham (2018). Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ferdinand, P., Müller, S., Ritschel, T., Wechselberger, U.: The eduventure-a new approach of digital game based learning combining virtual and mobile augmented reality games episodes. In: Pre-conference Workshop “Game based Learning” of DeLFI 2005 and GMW 2005 Conference, Rostock, vol. 13 (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rayar, F., Boas, D., Patrizio, R.: ART-chess: a tangible augmented reality chess on tabletop. In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive Tabletops & Surfaces, pp. 229–233. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bikos, M., Itoh, Y., Klinker, G., Moustakas, K.: An interactive augmented reality chess game using bare-hand pinch gestures. In: 2015 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW), pp. 355–358. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fender, A., Müller, J., Lindlbauer, D.: Creature teacher: a performance-based animation system for creating cylic movements. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction, pp. 113–122. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brooke, J.: SUS-a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189(194), 4–7 (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesco De Pace
    • 1
    Email author
  • Federico Manuri
    • 1
  • Andrea Sanna
    • 1
  • Davide Zappia
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Automatica e Informatica, Politecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations