Syntropic Counterpoints: Philosophical Content Generated Between Two Artificial Intelligence Clones
In the project Syntropic Counterpoints, we are using discussions between Artificial Intelligence clones to generate creative content. Nevertheless, our focus is less on content analysis and more on the beauty of creation itself and given context by the machines. We are using a different recurrent neural network (RNN), and collective creativity approaches to support interactions between Artificial Intelligence clones and trigger a humanless creative process which should lead to unsupervised robot creativity. The robots are trained by using the publications of some of the greatest thinkers of their time such as Aristotle, Nietzsche, Machiavelli, Sun Tzu and confronted to the crucial questions related to humankind such as understanding of moral, aesthetic, ethic, strategy, politics, etc. Throughout this robot-robot interaction model, we are trying to investigate the possibilities and consider limitations of using artificial intelligence in context-based creative processes as well as to raise questions related to potential future phenomena of machines mindfulness.
KeywordsArtificial intelligence Robot-robot interaction Intelligent interactive artifacts The art of AI sense Machine-made context art Interactive media art Interaction design
We thank Marko Jovanovic, brilliant Software Engineer, who gave us technical solution and developed the Artificial Intelligence Clones we are using in the project.
- 1.Ars electronica 2018 catalogues: Error - the art of imperfection. http://archive.aec.at/media/assets/d53d0ae6fa776b682c5f58f65ac696ab.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2018
- 2.Keras documentation. https://keras.io/. Accessed 30 Sept 2018
- 3.Tensorflow. https://www.tensorflow.org/. Accessed 30 Sept 2018
- 4.Welcome—flask (a python microframework). http://flask.pocoo.org/. Accessed 30 Sept 2018
- 5.Bostrom, N., Yudkowsky, E.: The ethics of artificial intelligence. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 316, p. 334 (2014)Google Scholar
- 8.Maher, M.L.: Computational and collective creativity: who’s being creative? In: ICCC, pp. 67–71. Citeseer (2012)Google Scholar