Advertisement

Introduction

  • Tapio RaunioEmail author
  • Thomas Sedelius
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Presidential Politics book series (PASTPRPO)

Abstract

This introductory chapter explains the main idea and objectives of emphasizing institutional coordination between the president and the prime minister in semi-presidential regimes. The book makes four main contributions to the literature: it develops a multidisciplinary theoretical framework drawing on four strands of literature; it provides an in-depth analysis of intra-executive decision-making based on unique expert interview data; it offers new insights on foreign policy leadership in semi-presidential regimes; and finally, it identifies institutional conditions that facilitate successful policy coordination in semi-presidential regimes. The chapter introduces the research design and data, presenting the focused comparison of Finland, Lithuania, and Romania and the use of expert interviews to reach behind the scenes of semi-presidential policy-making.

Keywords

Semi-presidentialism Semi-presidential regimes Semi-presidential policy-making Executive Institutional coordination Finland Lithuania Romania 

Bibliography

  1. Åberg, J. (2017). Imitating the Neighbors? A Multinominal Logistic Regression Analysis of Regime Type Choices as Related to Time and Space. Paper presented at Method Conference, Lund University.Google Scholar
  2. Åberg, J., & Sedelius, T. (2018). Review Article: A Structured Review of Semi-Presidential Studies: Debates, Results and Missing Pieces. British Journal of Political Science, First View.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000017.
  3. Amorim Neto, O., & Costa Lobo, M. (2009). Portugal’s Semi-Presidentialism (Re)considered: An Assessment of the President’s Role in the Policy Process, 1976–2006. European Journal of Political Research, 48(2), 234–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amorim Neto, O., & Strøm, K. (2006). Breaking the Parliamentary Chain of Delegation: Presidents and Non-partisan Cabinet Members in European Democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 36(4), 619–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arvo-ja asennetutkimus/EVA Attitude and Value Survey. (2018). www.eva.fi/eng. Accessed 13 Dec 2018.
  6. Beuman, L. M. (2016). Political Institutions in East Timor: Semi-Presidentialism and Democratisation. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carrier, M. (2015). Executive Politics in Semi-Presidential Regimes: Power Distribution and Conflict Between Presidents and Prime Ministers. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  8. Cheibub, J. A., Elkins, Z., & Ginsburg, T. (2014). Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 515–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doyle, D., & Elgie, R. (2016). Maximizing the Reliability of Cross-National Measures of Presidential Power. British Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 731–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duverger, M. (1980). A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government. European Journal of Political Research, 8(2), 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duvold, K., & Jurkynas, M. (2004). Lithuania. In S. Berglund, J. Ekman, & F. H. Aarebrot (Eds.), The Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe (2nd ed., pp. 133–179). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  12. Ekman, J., Duvold, K., & Berglund, S. (2014). Baltic Barometer 2014 [Datafile]. Huddinge: Södertörn University.Google Scholar
  13. Ekman, J., Duvold K., & Berglund, S. (2016). Social-Political Survey in Central Europe [Datafile]. Huddinge: Södertörn University.Google Scholar
  14. Elgie, R. (Ed.). (1999). Semi-Presidentialism in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Elgie, R. (2010). Semi-Presidentialism, Cohabitation and the Collapse of Electoral Democracies 1990–2008. Government and Opposition, 45(1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elgie, R. (2011). Semi-Presidentialism: Sub-Types and Democratic Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elgie, R. (2016). Three Waves of Semi-Presidential Studies. Democratization, 22(7), 1–22.Google Scholar
  18. Elgie, R. (2018a). Political Leadership: A Pragmatic Institutionalist Approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elgie, R. (2018b). List of Cohabitations. The Semi-Presidential One. Blog Post by Robert Elgie. www.semipresidentialism.com. Accessed 7 Oct 2018.
  20. Elgie, R., & McMenamin, I. (2011). Explaining the Onset of Cohabitation Under Semi-Presidentialism. Political Studies, 59(3), 616–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elgie, R., & Moestrup, S. (Eds.). (2008). Semi-Presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Elgie, R., & Moestrup, S. (Eds.). (2016). Semi-Presidentialism in the Caucasus and Central Asia. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Freedom House. Freedom in the World 2017. www.freedomhouse.org. Accessed 27 Jan 2017.
  24. Gherghina, S., & Miscoiu, S. (2013). The Failure of Cohabitation: Explaining the 2007 and 2012 Institutional Crises in Romania. East European Politics & Societies and Cultures, 27(4), 668–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hicken, A., & Stoll, H. (2013). Are All Presidents Created Equal? Presidential Powers and the Shadow of Presidential Elections. Comparative Political Studies, 46(3), 291–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lazardeux, S. G. (2015). Cohabitation and Conflicting Politics in French Policymaking. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moestrup, S. (2007). Semi-Presidentialism in Young Democracies: Help or Hindrance? In R. Elgie & S. Moestrup (Eds.), Semi-Presidentialism Outside Europe (pp. 30–55). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. New Europe Barometer 2001. (2016). NDB VI Autumn. Dataset SPP 364. CSPP School of Government & Public Policy at the University of Strathclyde. www.cspp.strath.ac.uk/nebo.html. Accessed 15 Sept 2016.
  29. New Europe Barometer 2004. (2016). NDB VII Winter. Dataset SPP 404. CSPP School of Government & Public Policy at the University of Strathclyde. www.cspp.strath.ac.uk/nebo.html. Accessed 15 Sept 2016.
  30. Passarelli, G. (Ed.). (2015). The Presidentialization of Political Parties: Organizations, Institutions and Leaders. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Peters, G. (2012). Institutional Theory in Political Science (3rd ed.). London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  32. Protsyk, O. (2005). Politics of Intra-Executive Conflict in Semi-Presidential Regimes in Eastern Europe. East European Politics and Society, 18(2), 1–20.Google Scholar
  33. Protsyk, O. (2006). Intra-Executive Competition Between President and Prime Minister: Patterns of Institutional Conflict and Cooperation in Semi-Presidential Regimes. Political Studies, 56(2), 219–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Raunio, T. (2012). Semi-Presidentialism and European Integration: Lessons from Finland for Constitutional Design. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(4), 567–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Raunio, T., & Sedelius, T. (2017). Shifting Power-Centres of Semi-Presidentialism: Exploring Executive Coordination in Lithuania. Government and Opposition, First view.  https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2017.31.
  36. Samuels, D. J., & Shugart, M. S. (2010). Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers: How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schleiter, P., & Morgan-Jones, E. (2009). Citizens, Presidents, and Assemblies: The Study of Semi-Presidentialism Beyond Duverger and Linz. British Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 871–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schleiter, P., & Morgan-Jones, E. (2010). Who’s in Charge? Presidents, Assemblies, and the Political Control of Semipresidential Cabinets. Comparative Political Studies, 43(11), 1415–1441.Google Scholar
  39. Sedelius, T. (2015). Party Presidentialization in Ukraine. In G. Passarelli (Ed.), The Presidentialization of Political Parties: Organizations, Institutions and Leaders (pp. 124–141). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sedelius, T. (2016). Ukrainas konstitutionella sicksackande: Regimförändring och partiutveckling under semipresidentialism. Nordisk Østforum, 30(1), 18–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sedelius, T., & Åberg, J. (2018). Eastern Europe’s Semi-Presidential Regimes. In P. Kopecky & A. Fagan (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of East European Politics (pp. 67–81). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Sedelius, T., & Ekman, J. (2010). Intra-Executive Conflict and Cabinet Instability: Effects of Semi-Presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe. Government and Opposition, 45(4), 505–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sedelius, T., & Linde, J. (2018). Unravelling Semi-Presidentialism: Democracy and Government Performance in Four Distinct Regime Types. Democratization, 25(1), 136–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sedelius, T., & Mashtaler, O. (2013). Two Decades of Semi-Presidentialism: Issues of Intra-Executive Conflict in Central and Eastern Europe 1991–2011. East European Politics, 29(2), 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shen, Y. (2011). Semi-Presidentialism in Taiwan: A Shadow of the Constitution of the Weimar Republic. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 7(1), 135–152.Google Scholar
  46. Shoesmith, D. (2003). Timor-Leste: Divided Leadership in a Semi-Presidential System. Asian Survey, 43(2), 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shugart, M. S. (2005). Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive And Mixed Authority Patterns. French Politics, 3(3), 323–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shugart, M. S., & Carey, J. M. (1992). Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Siaroff, A. (2003). Comparative Presidencies: The Inadequacy of the Presidential, Semi-Presidential and Parliamentary Distinction. European Journal of Political Research, 42(3), 287–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Skach, C. (2005). Constitutional Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Constitutional Political Economy, 16(4), 347–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Transparency International. (2019). The Corruption Perception Index 2018. http://www.transparency.org. Accessed 10 Jan 2019.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Management and BusinessTampere UniversityTampereFinland
  2. 2.School of Education, Health and Social SciencesDalarna UniversityFalunSweden

Personalised recommendations