Advertisement

Discussion and Conclusion

  • Susannah B. F. Paletz
  • Brooke E. Auxier
  • Ewa M. Golonka
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Complexity book series (BRIEFSCOMPLEXITY)

Abstract

This book contributes to the study of the propagation of information on social media by reviewing a broad multidisciplinary literature, leveraging theory and findings from information sciences, psychology, sociology, communication, political science, and more. We created a framework of information sharing on social media that also included findings from a qualitative analysis of 20 fake news stories. Although this work is thorough, it is not entirely exhaustive. Future work can, for example, examine the perception of and inherent truth of messages. The next phase of research would be to create metrics for those factors that currently lack them so as to quantitatively assess how they interact in a more finely defined model. Given that most of these factors have been examined in isolation, field studies are important to determine the relative weights of these factors. It is crucial that research that examines user-generated content be held to the ethical standards of other research. As technology develops and information warfare increases, it becomes necessary to better understand how these factors impact information sharing and the information environment.

Keywords

Social media Social media users Social media sharing Trolls Bots Propaganda Information sciences Psychology Sociology Communication Propagation Social cyber-security 

References

  1. Carley, K., Cevone, G., Agarwal, N., & Liu, H. (2018). Social cyber-security. In H. Bisgin, A. Hyder, C. Dancy, & R. Thomson (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference SBP-BRiMS 2018 (pp. 389–394). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Chessen, M. (2017). The MADCOM future: How artificial intelligence will enhance computational propaganda, reprogram human culture, and threaten democracy….and what can be done about it. Washington, DC: Atlantic Council.Google Scholar
  3. Doré, B. P., Scholz, C., Baek, E. C., Garcia, J. O., O’Donnell, M. B., Bassett, D. S., et al. (2018). Brain activity tracks population information sharing by capturing consensus judgments of value. Cerebral Cortex, 1, 9.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhy176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gelfand, M. J., Severance, L., Lee, T., Bruss, C. B., Lun, J., Abdel-Latif, A.-H., et al. (2015). Culture and getting to yes: The linguistic signature of creative agreements in the United States and Egypt. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 967–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hermida, A. (2014). Tell everyone: Why we share and why it matters. Toronto: Anchor Canada (Penguin Random House Canada).Google Scholar
  6. Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., et al. (2018). The science of fake news: Addressing fake news requires a multidisciplinary effort. Science, 359, 1094–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nimmo, B. (2019, May 19). Anatomy of an info-war: How Russia’s propaganda machine works, and how to counter it. Retrieved from https://www.stopfake.org/en/anatomy-of-an-info-war-how-russia-s-propaganda-machine-works-and-how-to-counter-it/
  8. Paletz, S. B. F. (Ed.). (2018). Measuring emotions in social media: Examining the relationship between emotional content and propagation. College Park, MD: University of Maryland Center for Advanced Study of Language.Google Scholar
  9. Sanovich, S., Stukal, D., & Tucker, J. A. (2018). Turning the virtual tables: Government strategies for addressing online opposition with an application to Russia. Comparative Politics, 50(3), 435–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Starbird, K., Arif, A., Wilson, T., Van Koevering, K., Yefimova, K., & Scarnecchia, D. (2018). Ecosystem or echo-system? Exploring content sharing across alternative media domains. In 12th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM-18) (pp. 365–374). Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  11. Stutzman, F. (2006). An evaluation of identity-sharing behavior in social network communities. Journal of the International Digital Media and Arts Association, 3, 10–18.Google Scholar
  12. Tsvetkova, M., Garcia-Gavilanes, R., Floridi, L., & Yasseri, T. (2017). Even good bots fight: The case of Wikipedia. PLoS One, 12, e0171774.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359, 1146–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susannah B. F. Paletz
    • 1
  • Brooke E. Auxier
    • 2
  • Ewa M. Golonka
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Advanced Study of LanguageUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.Philip Merrill College of JournalismUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations