Advertisement

Ability to Share

  • Susannah B. F. Paletz
  • Brooke E. Auxier
  • Ewa M. Golonka
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Complexity book series (BRIEFSCOMPLEXITY)

Abstract

The act of sharing information online depends on the actor’s ability to share—that is, having access to social media platforms, being willing to use social media, and being familiar with relevant technology. Several social media affordances also play a role in whether people share online content. These affordances are both sociotechnical (i.e., the way people interact with technology) and practical (i.e., capabilities of specific platforms that allow users to create content, build networks, and share information).

Keywords

Social media Social media users Social media sharing Sociotechnical Affordances Social networks Twitter Facebook Reddit VKontakte Communication Self efficacy 

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bazarova, N., Choi, Y., Sosik, V., Cosley, D., & Whitlock, J. (2015). Social sharing of emotions on Facebook: Channel differences, satisfaction, and replies. In ACM Conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 154–164). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  3. Debatin, B. (2008). The internet as a new platform for expressing opinions and as a new public sphere. In W. Donsbach & M. W. Traugott (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of public opinion research (pp. 64–72). Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22, 35–52.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gayo-Avello, D. (2011). Don’t turn social media into another ‘Literary Digest’ poll. Communications of the ACM, 54, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gibson, J. J. (1979). Ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  7. Haralabopoulos, G., Anagnostopoulos, I., & Zeadally, S. (2015). Lifespan and propagation of information in On-line Social Networks: A case study based on Reddit. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 56, 88–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2015.06.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee, C., & Ma, L. (2012). News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 331–339.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G. C., & Azad, B. (2013). The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 38–55.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mills, A. (2012). Virality in social media: The SPIN framework. Journal of Public Affairs, 12, 162–169.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Syn, S., & Oh, S. (2015). Why do social network site users share information on Facebook and Twitter? Journal of Information Science, 41, 553–569.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551515585717CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susannah B. F. Paletz
    • 1
  • Brooke E. Auxier
    • 2
  • Ewa M. Golonka
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Advanced Study of LanguageUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.Philip Merrill College of JournalismUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations