Advertisement

Epistemological Questions of Qualitative Crisis Research. Exploring the Attitudes of Children and Adolescents on Migration and Meritocratic Ideas of Society

  • Baris Ertugrul
  • Marc GrimmEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research book series (CHIR, volume 20)

Abstract

Baris Ertugrul and Marc Grimm address epistemological questions of qualitative child-oriented crisis research in their contribution. The authors discuss the relation between subjectivity and society and explain this understanding based on interviews with children and adolescents in Germany which revolve around the topics of migration and (distributive) justice. At times, the interviews show that distributive justice today is thought of in quite contradictory terms. At the same time, there are positions which speak in favour of meritocratic concepts of justice, which are also consequently used to argue harshly and demandingly in relation to refugees. In the same interview, the same adolescent expresses a disengaged empathy with refugees. The authors’ interpretation is that this “on the one hand describes national problems as crisis-ridden and acute, and on the other hand relativises those problems in the global context almost to insignificance, and grants pity and unconditional help to refugees”.

Keywords

Children Adolescents Crises Dispositions Habitus Epistemology Meritocracy Socialisation 

References

  1. Adorno, T. W. (1972). Zum Verhältnis von Soziologie und Psychologie. Soziologische Schriften. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  2. Alanen, L. (1988). Rethinking childhood. Acta Sociologica, 31(1), 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauer, U. (2018). Wodurch bleibt die Jugendphase signifikant. Sammelband Jugendsoziologie. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, N. (2015). Der Beitrag der Neurowissenschaften zur Sozialisationsforschung. In K. Hurrelmann, U. Bauer, S. Walper, & M. Grundmann (Eds.), Handbuch Sozialisationsforschung (pp. 80–95). Weinhein/Basel: Beltz.Google Scholar
  5. Bertram, H. (2003). Glen Elder. In H. P. Müller & M. Schmid (Eds.), Hauptwerke der Ungleichheitsforschung. Wiesbaden: VS Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1987). Die feinen Unterschiede. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Soziologie als Beruf. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Economou, C. et al. (2014). The impact of financial crisis on health and health system, WHO.Google Scholar
  9. Elder, G. (1974). Children of the great depression. In Social change in life experience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Grimm, M., Ertugrul, B., & Bauer, U. (2018). Outlining the academic field of a child- and youth- oriented crisis-research. Adolescent Research Review.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-018-0086-3.
  11. Hurrelmann, K. (1983). Das Modell des produktiv realitätsverarbeitenden Subjekts in der Sozialisationsforschung. Zeitschrift für Sozialisationsforschung und Erziehungssoziologie, 3(3), 363–383.Google Scholar
  12. Hurrelmann, K., & Bauer, U. (2015). Socialisation during the life course. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Kelle, H. (2018). Generationale Ordnung als Propium von Erziehungswissenschaft und Kindheitssoziologie. In T. Betz et al. (Eds.), Kindheiten. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  14. Lüscher, K. (2016). Sozialisation und Ambivalenz. Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation, 36(2), 118–136.Google Scholar
  15. Van Deth, J. W., Abendschön, S., Rathke, J., & Vollmar, M. (2007). Kinder und Politik. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department for Socialization Research and Centre for Prevention and Intervention in Childhood and Adolescence (CPI)Bielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations