Advertisement

Queer Families Performing Kinship

  • Rita Béres-Deák
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life book series (PSFL)

Abstract

In this chapter, I will look at how the same-sex couple functions and is treated within the wider kinship network. First, I will look at some kinship obligations that same-sex couples may fail, leading to their potential exclusion from the family. Then I will problematize inclusion and exclusion, citing examples where the same practice may be interpreted as either, depending on perspective and expectations. We will then meet some families who have completely integrated the same-sex couple, and some others who, while have not broken off contact, signal their exclusionary attitude through their performative language and/or practices. Finally, I will look at how kinship obligations may cause conflict within the family and the couple, also illustrating that not everybody is happy to be included in their partner’s family.

Bibliography

  1. Ariés, Philippe. 1962. Centuries of Childhood: A Social History of Family Life. Toronto and London: Jonathan Cape Ltd.Google Scholar
  2. Austin, J.L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, Marlon M. 2013. Butch Queens Up in Pumps: Gender, Performance, and Ballroom Culture in Detroit. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bakó, Boglárka. 2008. Zsuzska, a rossz. Cigány női normák egy erdélyi kis közösségben [Zsuzska, the Bad One: Norms for Gypsy Women in a Transsylvanian Small Community]. In Határtalan nők. Kizártak és befogadottak a női társadalomban [Women Without Borders: The Included and Excluded in Women’s Society], ed. Boglárka Bakó and Eszter Zsófia Tóth, 129–150. Budapest: Nyitott Könyvműhely.Google Scholar
  5. Bánlaky, Pál. 2006. A család belső működése – A családon belüli kapcsolatok dinamikája [Internal Functioning of the Family—The Dynamics of Family Relationships]. In Családszociológia szöveggyűjtemény [A Family Sociology Reader], ed. Ibolya Czibere. Debrecen: Debreceni Egyetem.Google Scholar
  6. Bertone, Chiara, and Marina Franchi. 2008. Research Report: The Experiences of Family Members of Gay and Lesbian Young People in Italy. In Family Matters: Supporting Families to Prevent Violence Against Gay and Lesbian Youth, ed. Chiara Bertone and Marina Franchi. Conference Proceedings, European Conference, Florence, 20–21 June 2008.Google Scholar
  7. Boreczky, Ágnes. 2004. A szimbolikus család. Az értelmezés idejének és terének kiterjesztése [Symbolic Family: Extending the Time and Space of Interpretation]. Budapest: Gondolat.Google Scholar
  8. Borneman, John. 1992. Belonging in the Two Berlins: Kin, State, Nation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Broad, K.L. 2011. Coming Out for Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays: From Support Group Grieving to Love Advocacy. Sexualities 14 (4): 399–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bryceson, Deborah, and Ulla Vuorela. 2002. Transnational Families in the Twenty-First Century. In The Transnational Family: New European Frontiers and Global Networks, ed. Deborah Bryceson and Ulla Vuorela, 3–30. Oxford and New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  11. Buchowski, Michał. 2006. The Specter of Orientalism in Europe: From Exotic Other to Stigmatized Brother. Anthropological Quarterly 79 (3): 463–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collier, Jane Fishburne, and Sylvia Junko Yanagisako. 1987. Toward a Unified Analysis of Gender and Kinship. In Gender and Kinship: Essays Toward a Unified Analysis, ed. Jane Fishburne Collier and Sylvia Junko Yanagisako, 14–52. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Creed, Gerald W. 2001. Economic Crisis and Ritual Decline in Eastern Europe. In Postsocialism: Ideals, Ideologies and Practices in Eurasia, ed. C.M. Hann, 57–73. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Cross, Gary. 2004. Just for Kids: How Holidays Became Child-Centered. In We Are What We Celebrate: Understanding Holidays and Rituals, ed. Amitai Etzioni and Jared Bloom, 61–73. New York and London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Csányi, Gergely, and Szabina Kerényi. 2018. A “jó anya” mítosza Magyarországon a reproduktív munka és a piac globális történetének szempontjából [The Myth of the ‘Good Mother’ in Hungary from the Perspective of Reproductive Work and the Global History of the Market]. Fordulat 2 (24): 134–160.Google Scholar
  16. Decena, Carlos Ulises. 2008. Tacit Subjects. GLQ 14 (2–3): 339–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Demény, Enikő. 2009. ‘Loving Mothers’ at Work: Raising Others’ Children and Building Families with the Intention to Love and Take Care. In European Kinship in the Age of Biotechnology, ed. Jeanette Edwards and Charles Salazar, 128–143. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  18. Dombos, Tamás, Takács Judit, P. Tóth Tamás, and Mocsonaki László. 2011. Az LMBT emberek magyarországi helyzetének rövid áttekintése [A Short Overview of the Situation of LGBT People in Hungary]. In Homofóbia Magyarországon [Homophobia in Hungary], ed. Judit Takács, 35–54. Budapest: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  19. Donzelot, Jacques. 1977. The Policing of Families. Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Du Chesne, Louise, and Ben Bradley. 2007. The Subjective Experience of the Lesbian (M)other: An Exploration of the Construction of Lesbian Maternal Identity. Gay & Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review 3 (1): 25–33.Google Scholar
  21. Dunaway, Wilma A. 2012. The Semiproletarian Household Over the Longue Durée of the Modern World System. In The Longue Durée and World System Analysis, ed. Richard E. Lee. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  22. Dunn, Elizabeth. 2004. Privatizing Poland: Baby Food, Big Business, and the Remaking of Labor. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Etzioni, Amitai. 2004. Holidays and Rituals: Neglected Seedbeds of Virtue. In We Are What We Celebrate: Understanding Holidays and Rituals, ed. Amitai Etzioni and Jared Bloom, 1–43. New York and London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fél, Edit, and Tamás Hofer. 1969. Proper Peasants: Traditional Life in a Hungarian Village. New York: Wenner-Green Foundation for Anthropological Research Inc.Google Scholar
  25. Finch, Janet. 1989. Family Obligations and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gabb, Jacqui. 2010 [2008]. Researching Intimacy in Families. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Glass, Valerie Q. 2014. “We Are with Family”: Black Lesbian Couples Negotiate Rituals with Extended Families. Journal of LGBT Family Studies 10 (1–2): 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gregor, Anikó, and Eszter Kováts. 2018. Nőügyek. Társadalmi problémák és megoldási stratégiák. A kutatási eredmények összefoglalója [Women’s Affairs: Social Problems and Problem-Solving Strategies: A Summary of Research Findings]. Budapest: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Google Scholar
  29. Gross, Martine. 2011. Grandparenting in French Lesbian and Gay Families. In Doing Families: Gay and Lesbian Family Practices, ed. J. Takács and R. Kuhar, 117–134. Mirovni Inštitut: Ljubljana.Google Scholar
  30. Habermas, J. 1998. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Halberstam, Judith. 1998. Female Masculinity. Durham and London: Durham University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Haney, Lynne. 1999. “But We Are Still Mothers”: Gender, the State, and the Construction of Need in Postsocialist Hungary. In Uncertain Transition: Ethnographies of Change in the Postsocialist World, ed. Michael Burawoy and Katherine Verdery, 151–188. Lanham and Boulder: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  33. Herdt, Gilbert, and Bruce Koff. 2000. Something to Tell You: The Road Families Travel When a Child Is Gay. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Herlofson, Katharina, and Gunhild O. Hagestad. 2012. Transformations in the Role of Grandparents Across Welfare States. In Contemporary Grandparenting: Changing Family Relationships in Global Contexts, ed. Sara Arber and Virpi Timonen, 27–50. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 2003 [1989]. The Second Shift. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  36. Jackson, Stevie. 2005. Sexuality, Heterosexuality and Gender Hierarchy: Getting Our Priorities Straight. In Thinking Straight: The Power, the Promise, and the Paradox of Heterosexuality, ed. Chrys Ingraham, 15–38. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Jamieson, Lynn, Roona Simpson, and Ruth Lewis (eds.). 2011. Researching Families and Relationships: Reflections on Process, 122–134. New York, Houndmills, and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kapitány, Ágnes, and Gábor Kapitány. 2007. Túlélési stratégiák. Társadalmi adaptációs módok [Survival Strategies: Social Methods of Adaptation]. Budapest: Kossuth Kiadó.Google Scholar
  39. Dr. Kék, Emerencia. 2012. A homoszexualitás: zsákutca helyett – haladás [Homosexuality: Development Instead of Cul-de-sac]. Presentation, 14 November 2012, Sapientia Szerzetesi Hittudományi Főiskola [Sapientia College of Monastic Theology].Google Scholar
  40. Kipnis, Laura. 2000. Adultery. In Intimacy, ed. Lauren Berlant, 9–47. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kligman, Gail. 1998. The Politics of Duplicity: Controlling Reproduction in Ceausescu’s Romania. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kopytoff, Igor. 2004. Commoditizing Kinship in America. In Consuming Motherhood, ed. Janelle S. Taylor, Linda L. Layne, and Danielle F. Wozniak, 271–278. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kravchenko, Zhanna. 2012. Everyday Continuity and Change: Family and Family Policy in Russia. In And They Lived Happily Ever After: Norms and Everyday Practices of Family and Parenthood in Russia and Eastern Europe, ed. Helene Carlbäck, Yulia Gradskova, and Zhanna Kravchenko, 185–206. Budapest and New York: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Kuhar, Roman. 2011. The Heteronormative Panopticon and the Transparent Closet of the Public Space in Slovenia. In De-Centring Western Sexualities: Central and Eastern European Perspectives, ed. Robert Kulpa and Joanna Mizielińska, 149–166. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kuosmanen, Paula, and Juha Jämsä. 2007. Suomalaiset sateenkaariperheet sosiaali- ja terveyspalveluissa ja koulussa [Finnish Rainbow Families in Social and Health Services and School] Helsinki: Edita Prima Oy.Google Scholar
  46. Lawler, Steph. 2000. Mothering the Self: Mothers, Daughters, Subjects. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 2004 [1949]. Structural Analysis in Linguistics and Anthropology. In Kinship and Family: An Anthropological Reader, ed. Robert Parkin and Linda Stone, 145–157. Malden, Oxford, and Carlton: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  48. Lewin, Ellen. 1993. Lesbian Mothers: Accounts of Gender in American Culture. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Lewin, Ellen. 1998. Recognizing Ourselves: Ceremonies of Lesbian and Gay Commitment. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Lewin, Ellen. 2009. Gay Fatherhood: Narratives of Family and Citizenship in America. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Mauss, Marcel. 1990. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Modell, Judith. 1998. Rights to the Children: Foster Care and Social Reproduction in Hawai’i. In Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power, and Technological Innovation, ed. Sarah Franklin and Helena Ragoné, 156–172. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  53. Morgan, David H.J. 1996. Family Connections: An Introduction to Family Studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  54. Neményi, Mária. 2000. Csoportkép nőkkel [Group Picture with Women]. Budapest: Új Mandátum.Google Scholar
  55. Neményi, Mária, and Judit Takács. 2015. Örökbefogadás és diszkrimináció Magyarországon [Adoption and Discrimination in Hungary]. Esély 2015 (2): 67–96.Google Scholar
  56. Parkin, Robert. 2004. Introduction to Terminology and Affinal Alliance. In Kinship and Family: An Anthropological Reader, ed. Robert Parkin and Linda Stone, 121–136. Boston: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  57. Phelan, Shane. 2001. Sexual Strangers: Gays, Lesbians, and Dilemmas of Citizenship. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Pittaway, Mark. 2002. Retreat from Collective Protest: Household, Gender, Work and Popular Opposition in Stalinist Hungary. In Rebellious Families: Household Strategies and Collective Action in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, ed. Jan Kok, 199–230. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  59. Rofel, Lisa. 1999. Other Modernities: Gendered Yearnings in China After Socialism. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  60. Sahlins, Marshall. 2013. What Kinship Is—And Is Not. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sandberg, Linn. 2016. Towards a Happy Ending? Positive Ageing, Heteronormativity and Un/Happy Intimacies. Lambda Nordica 4 (20): 19–44.Google Scholar
  62. Savin-Williams, Rich C. 1989. Parental Influences on the Self-Esteem of Gay and Lesbian Youths: A Reflected Appraisals Model. In Gay and Lesbian Youth, ed. Gilbert Herdt, 93–109. New York and London: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  63. Schneider, David. 1968. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  64. Somlai, Péter. 1986. Konfliktus és megértés. A családi kapcsolatrendszer elmélete [Conflict and Understanding: A Theory of the Web of Family Relations]. Budapest: Gondolat.Google Scholar
  65. Somlai, Péter. 2002. Húsz év. Családi kapcsolatok változásai a 20. század végi Magyarországon [Twenty Years: Changes in Family Relationships in Late-20th Century Hungary]. Budapest: Új Mandátum.Google Scholar
  66. Sontag, Susan. 1977. On Photography. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  67. Stack, Carol, and Linda M. Burton. 1994. Kinscripts: Reflections on Family, Generation, and Culture. In Mothering: Ideology, Experience, and Agency, ed. Evelyn Nakano Glenn, Grace Chang, and Linda Rennie Forcey, 33–44. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Sullivan, Maureen. 2004. The Family of Woman: Lesbian Mothers, Their Children, and the Undoing of Gender. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  69. Švab, Alenka, and Roman Kuhar. 2005. The Unbearable Comfort of Privacy: The Everyday Life of Gays and Lesbians. Ljubljana: Mirovni Inštitut.Google Scholar
  70. Szenteh, Natália. 2005. És ha a te gyereked lenne homoszexuális? [And if Your Child Was Homosexual?]. Budapest: Masculus.Google Scholar
  71. Tilly, Louise A., and Joan W. Scott. 1987. Women, Work and Family. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  72. Tizard, Barbara, and Ann Phoenix. 1993. Black, White or Mixed Race? Race and Racism in the Lives of Young People of Mixed Parentage. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Tóth, Eszter Zsófia. 2008. ‘Gábor, csináljunk gyereket, hadd vessen cigánykereket!’ A megesett lánytól az egyedülálló anyáig – a lányanyák megítélésének változása a szocialista időszakban [‘Gábor, Let’s Make a Child, Let Him Do a Cartwheel’: From Fallen Girl to Single Mother—Changes in Attitudes Towards Unwed Mothers Under State Socialism]. In Határtalan nők. Kizártak és befogadottak a női társadalomban [Women Without Borders: The Included and Excluded in Women’s Society], ed. Boglárka Bakó and Eszter Zsófia Tóth, 338–357. Budapest: Nyitott Könyvműhely.Google Scholar
  74. Warner, Michael. 1999. The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics and the Ethics of Queer Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Weston, Kath. 1991. Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Weston, Kath. 1995. Forever Is a Long Time: Romancing the Real in Gay Kinship Ideologies. In Naturalizing Power: Essays in Feminist Cultural Analysis, ed. Sylvia Yanagisako and Carol Delaney, 87–110. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  77. Winnicott, D.W. 1992 [1964]. The Child, the Family, and the Outside World. Boston: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
  78. Yoshino, Kenji. 2007. Covering: The Hidden Assault on Our Civil Rights. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  79. Young, Michael, and Peter Wilmott. 1957. Family and Kinship in East London. Harmondsworth: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  80. Yuval-Davis, Nira. 1997. Gender and Nation. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, and Singapore: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rita Béres-Deák
    • 1
  1. 1.BudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations