Advertisement

Cell Separation and Disruption, Product Recovery, and Purification

  • Sze Ying Lee
  • Kit Wayne Chew
  • Pau Loke ShowEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Learning Materials in Biosciences book series (LMB)

Abstract

Advances in upstream production (in the bioreactor) have been successful in promoting high product titres, and downstream processing now is important to obtain the final biological product in its desired purity and concentration level. Downstream processing of a biological product consists of multiple steps of individual physicochemical operations. These operations are integrated into a sequence to yield an optimal product recovery scheme. Downstream processing of a biological product that is produced via fermentation process, in general, starts with cell separation step and is followed by cell disruption operation and, finally, product recovery and purification. All the major elements of relevant technologies are presented in this chapter.

After fermentation process, the target product has to be separated from the depleted fermentation broth containing microorganism cells, fermentation ingredients remained, and metabolic waste products generated along the fermentation process. For an extracellular product, a solid-liquid separation operation can be applied directly just after fermentation process to acquire a product-rich suspension. These separation processes might involve filtration and centrifugation steps, which are detailed in this chapter. On the other hand, for a product of interest that is synthesized intracellularly by the producing host cell and is not secreted to surrounding medium, it is necessary to harvest the cells first and subsequently release the target product from the cell compartments by external physical force and/or chemical treatment. Several classical cellular lysis procedures are available and are practically applied for a wide range of biological products. The cell disruption techniques are reviewed in this chapter. After the cells are broken open, the target product is released to surrounding medium. The product-rich suspension is then processed to remove cell debris in order to prepare an extract that is free of cell or cell debris for further product recovery and purification processes.

Keywords

Recovery Purification Cell disruption Bio-separation 

References

  1. 1.
    Adham NZ, Ahmed EM. Extracellular lipase of Aspergillus niger NRRL3; production, partial purification and properties. Indian J Microbiol. 2009;49:77–83.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-009-0004-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Albertsson PÅ. Partition of cell particles and macromolecules. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 1986.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ali A, Khan Z, Sahib M, Durrani S, Shaligram U, Raju E, Durrani A. Purification of recombinant subunit vaccine by HbsAg cell lysis using various enrichments of chaotropic and non-ionic detergents. Biosci Biotechnol Res Commun. 2016;9:244–52.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Allen JR, Patkar AY, Frank TC, Donate FA, Chiu YC, Shields JE, Gustafson ME. Use of glycol ethers for selective release of periplasmic proteins from gram-negative bacteria. Biotechnol Prog. 2007;23:1163–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Amirkhani MA, Mohseni R, Soleimani M, Shoae-Hassani A, Nilforoushzadeh MA. A rapid sonication based method for preparation of stromal vascular fraction and mesenchymal stem cells from fat tissue. Bioimpacts. 2016;6:99–104.  https://doi.org/10.15171/bi.2016.14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anand H, Balasundaram B, Pandit AB, Harrison STL. The effect of chemical pretreatment combined with mechanical disruption on the extent of disruption and release of intracellular protein from E-coli. Biochem Eng J. 2007;35:166–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2007.01.01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Andrews BA, Asenjo JA. Enzymatic lysis and disruption of microbial-cells. Trends Biotechnol. 1987;5:273–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7799(87)90058-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Antharavally BS, Mallia KA, Rosenblatt MM, Salunkhe AM, Rogers JC, Haney P, Haghdoost N. Efficient removal of detergents from proteins and peptides in a spin column format. Anal Biochem. 2011;416:39–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2011.05.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Babu K, Satyanarayana T. α-Amylase production by thermophilic Bacillus coagulans in solid state fermentation. Process Biochem. 1995;30:305–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Balasundaram B, Harrison S, Bracewell DG. Advances in product release strategies and impact on bioprocess design. Trends Biotechnol. 2009;27:477–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Basheer SA, Thenmozhi M. Reverse micellar separation of lipases: a critical review. Int J Chem Sci. 2010;8:57–67.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bensley RR, Hoerr NL. Studies on cell structure by the freezing-drying method VI. The preparation and properties of mitochondria. Anat Rec. 1934;60:449–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bezerra RP, Borba FKSL, Moreira KA, Lima-Filho JL, Porto ALF, Chaves AC. Extraction of amylase from fermentation broth in poly (ethylene glycol) salt aqueous two-phase system. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2006;49:547–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bi PY, Li DQ, Dong HR. A novel technique for the separation and concentration of penicillin G from fermentation broth: aqueous two-phase flotation. Sep Purif Technol. 2009;69:205–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2009.07.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bi PY, Dong HR, Yuan YC. Application of aqueous two-phase flotation in the separation and concentration of puerarin from Puerariae extract. Sep Purif Technol. 2010;75:402–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2010.09.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bi PY, Chang L, Dong HR. Separation behavior of penicillin in aqueous two-phase flotation. Chin J Anal Chem. 2011;39:425–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1872-2040(10)60428-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bi PY, Chang L, Mu YL, Liu JY, Wu Y, Geng X, Wei Y. Separation and concentration of baicalin from Scutellaria Baicalensis Georgi extract by aqueous two-phase flotation. Sep Purif Technol. 2013;116:454–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.06.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bimboim H, Doly J. A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979;7:1513–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Borrero-de Acuña JM, Hidalgo-Dumont C, Pacheco N, Cabrera A, Poblete-Castro I. A novel programmable lysozyme-based lysis system in Pseudomonas putida for biopolymer production. Sci Rep. 2017;7:4373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Braga ARC, Lemes AC, Kalil SJ. Single chromatographic step for beta-Galactosidase purification: influence of salt and elution parameters. Sep Sci Technol. 2014;49:1817–24.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2014.902960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Carta G, Jungbauer A. Downstream processing of biotechnology products protein chromatography: process development and scale-up. Weinheim: Wiley; 2010. p. 1–55.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chang S, Guo Y, Wu B, He B. Extracellular expression of alkali tolerant xylanase from Bacillus subtilis Lucky9 in E. coli and application for xylooligosaccharides production from agro-industrial waste. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;96:249–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chen YC, Chen LA, Chen SJ, Chang MC, Chen TL. Modified osmotic shock for periplasmic release of a recombinant creatinase from Escherichia coli. Biochem Eng J. 2004;19:211–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2004.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chentir I, Hamdi M, Doumandji A, HadjSadok A, Ouada HB, Nasri M, Jridi M. Enhancement of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) production in Spirulina (Arthrospira sp.) by two-step cultivation process and partial characterization of their polysaccharidic moiety. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;105:1412–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chisti Y, Moo-Young M. Disruption of microbial cells for intracellular products. Enzym Microb Technol. 1986;8:194–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Choi JH, Lee SY. Secretory and extracellular production of recombinant proteins using Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;64:625–35.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1559-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Comménil P, Belingheri L, Sancholle M, Dehorter B. Purification and properties of an extracellular lipase from the fungus Botrytis cinerea. Lipids. 1995;30:351–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dako E, Dadie AT, Bernier A-M, Jankowski CK. The problems associated with enzyme purification. United Kingdom: Intech Open Access Publisher; 2012.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Danilevich VN, Petrovskaia LE, Grishin EV. Rapid and efficient extraction of soluble proteins from gram-negative microorganisms without disruption of cell walls. Bioorg Khim. 2006;32:579–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    de Carvalho JC, Medeiros ABP, Letti LAJ, Kirnev PCS, Soccol CR. Cell disruption and isolation of intracellular products. Current developments in biotechnology and bioengineering: production. Isolation and Purif Ind Prod. 2017;  https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-63662-1.00035-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dedmon RE, Holmes AW, Deinhardt F. Preparation of fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled γ-globulin by dialysis, gel filtration, and ion-exchange chromatography in combination. J Bacteriol. 1965;89:734–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Diamond AD, Hsu JT. Protein partitioning in PEG/dextran aqueous two-phase systems. Aiche J. 1990;36:1017–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Duarte SH, dos Santos P, Michelon M, de Pinho Oliveira SM, Martínez J, Maugeri F. Recovery of yeast lipids using different cell disruption techniques and supercritical CO2 extraction. Biochem Eng J. 2017;125:230–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dugo P, Cacciola F, Kumm T, Dugo G, Mondello L. Comprehensive multidimensional liquid chromatography: theory and applications. J Chromatogr A. 2008;1184:353–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.06.074.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    El-Naggar NE-A, Soliman HM, El-Shweihy NM. Extracellular cholesterol oxidase production by Streptomyces aegyptia, in vitro anticancer activities against rhabdomyosarcoma, breast cancer cell-lines and in vivo apoptosis. Sci Rep. 2018;8:2706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Emek SC, Szilagyi A, Akerlund HE, Albertsson PA, Kohnke R, Holm A, Erlanson-Albertsson C. A large scale method for preparation of plant thylakoids for use in body weight regulation. Prep Biochem Biotechnol. 2010;40:13–27.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10826060903413057.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Eom GT, Lee SH, Song BK, Chung KW, Kim YW, Song JK. High-level extracellular production and characterization of Candida antarctica lipase B in Pichia pastoris. J Biosci Bioeng. 2013;116:165–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.02.016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Faria JTD, Rocha PF, Converti A, Passos FM, Minim LA, Sampaio FC. Statistical investigation of Kluyveromyces lactis cells permeabilization with ethanol by response surface methodology. Braz J Microbiol. 2013;44:1067–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Fernández García L, Álvarez Blanco S, Riera Rodríguez FA. Microfiltration applied to dairy streams: removal of bacteria. J Sci Food Agric. 2013;93:187–96.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.5935.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Fischer I, Franzreb M. Removal of the nonionic surfactant Eumulgin ES from protein solutions by means of adsorption and ultrafiltration. Sep Purif Technol. 2013;118:217–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fonseca LP, Cabral JMS. Penicillin acylase release from Escherichia coli cells by mechanical cell disruption and permeabilization. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2002;77:159–67.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Francis F, Sabu A, Nampoothiri KM, Ramachandran S, Ghosh S, Szakacs G, Pandey A. Use of response surface methodology for optimizing process parameters for the production of α-amylase by Aspergillus oryzae. Biochem Eng J. 2003;15:107–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fraser D. Bursting bacteria by release of gas pressure. Nature. 1951;167:33–4.  https://doi.org/10.1038/167033b0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Geciova J, Bury D, Jelen P. Methods for disruption of microbial cells for potential use in the dairy industry - a review. Int Dairy J. 2002;12:541–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0958-6946(02)00038-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Granum E, Kirkvold S, Myklestad SM. Cellular and extracellular production of carbohydrates and amino acids by the marine diatom Skeletonema costatum: diel variations and effects of N depletion. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2002;242:83–94.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps242083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Grodzki AC, Berenstein E. Antibody purification: ion-exchange chromatography. In: Oliver C, Jamur MC, editors. Immunocytochemical methods and protocols, Methods in molecular biology, vol. 588. 3rd ed. Totowa: Humana Press Inc; 2010. p. 27–32.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-324-0_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Guimaraes LHS, Somera AF, Terenzi HF, Polizeli M, Jorge JA. Production of beta-fructofuranosidases by Aspergillus niveus using agroindustrial residues as carbon sources: characterization of an intracellular enzyme accumulated in the presence of glucose. Process Biochem. 2009;44:237–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2008.10.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gustafson ME, Clayton RA, Lavrik PB, Johnson GV, Leimgruber RM, Sims SR, Bartnicki DE. Large-scale production and characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. tenebrionis insecticidal protein from Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1997;47:255–61.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530050923.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hagel L. Gel-filtration chromatography. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 1998;44:10.19.11–2.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Haimer E, Tscheliessnig A, Hahn R, Jungbauer A. Hydrophobic interaction chromatography of proteins IV - kinetics of protein spreading. J Chromatogr A. 2007;1139:84–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2006.11.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Han J, Wang Y, Yu C, Li C, Yan Y, Liu Y, Wang L. Separation, concentration and determination of chloramphenicol in environment and food using an ionic liquid/salt aqueous two-phase flotation system coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal Chim Acta. 2011;685:138–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2010.11.033.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Harrison STL. Bacterial cell disruption: a key unit operation in the recovery of intracellular products. Biotechnol Adv. 1991;9:217–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-9750(91)90005-G.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Harrison RG, Todd P, Rudge SR, Petrides DP. Bioseparations science and engineering. Top Chem Eng. 2015;2015:348.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hatti-Kaul R. Aqueous two-phase systems: methods and protocols, vol. 11. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hjelmeland LM. [21] removal of detergents from membrane proteins. In: Deutscher MP, editor. Methods in Enzymology, vol. 182. New York: Academic Press; 1990. p. 277–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(90)82023-U.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ho CW, Chew TK, Ling TC, Kamaruddin S, Tan WS, Tey BT. Efficient mechanical cell disruption of Escherichia coli by an ultrasonicator and recovery of intracellular hepatitis B core antigen. Process Biochem. 2006;41:1829–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ho CW, Tan WS, Yap WB, Ling TC, Tey BT. Comparative evaluation of different cell disruption methods for the release of recombinant hepatitis B Core antigen from Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng. 2008;13:577–83.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-008-0020-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hober S, Nord K, Linhult M. Protein a chromatography for antibody purification. J Chromatogr B-Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2007;848:40–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chromb.2006.09.030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hou J, Miao LZ, Wang C, Wang PF, Ao YH, Lv BW. Effect of CuO nanoparticles on the production and composition of extracellular polymeric substances and physicochemical stability of activated sludge flocs. Bioresour Technol. 2015;176:65–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.020.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Huge-Jensen B, Galluzzo DR, Jensen RG. Studies on free and immobilized lipases fromMucor miehei. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1988;65:905–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ibrahim ASS, Al-Salamah AA, Elbadawi YB, El-Tayeb MA, Ibrahim SSS. Production of extracellular alkaline protease by new halotolerant alkaliphilic Bacillus sp NPST-AK15 isolated from hyper saline soda lakes. Electron J Biotechnol. 2015;18:236–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2015.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Isa MHM, Frazier RA, Jauregi P. A further study of the recovery purification of surfactin from fermentation broth by membrane filtration. Sep Purif Technol. 2008;64:176–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2008.09.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Islam MS, Aryasomayajula A, Selvaganapathy PR. A review on macroscale and microscale cell lysis methods. Micromachines. 2017;8  https://doi.org/10.3390/mi8030083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Jacquel N, Lo C-W, Wei Y-H, Wu H-S, Wang SS. Isolation and purification of bacterial poly(3-hydroxyalkanoates). Biochem Eng J. 2008;39:15–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2007.11.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Jauregi P, Coutte F, Catiau L, Lecouturier D, Jacques P. Micelle size characterization of lipopeptides produced by B. subtilis and their recovery by the two-step ultrafiltration process. Sep Purif Technol. 2013;104:175–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.11.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Jiang B, Li Z-G, Dai J-Y, Zhang D-J, Xiu Z-L. Aqueous two-phase extraction of 2,3-butanediol from fermentation broths using an ethanol/phosphate system. Process Biochem. 2009;44:112–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Johnson BH, Hecht MH. Recombinant proteins can be isolated from escherichia-coli-cells by repeated cycles of freezing and thawing. Biotechnology. 1994;12:1357–60.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1294-1357.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Kasieczka-Burnecka M, Kuc K, Kalinowska H, Knap M, Turkiewicz M. Purification and characterization of two cold-adapted extracellular tannin acyl hydrolases from an Antarctic strain Verticillium sp. P9. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;77:77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kaveh-Baghbaderani Y, Blank-Shim SA, Koch T, Berensmeier S. Selective release of overexpressed recombinant proteins from E. coli cells facilitates one-step chromatographic purification of peptide-tagged green fluorescent protein variants. Protein Expr Purif. 2018;152:155–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Kelly WJ, Muske KR. Optimal operation of high-pressure homogenization for intracellular product recovery. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2004;27:25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kim M, Wu LD, Kim B, Hung DT, Han J. Continuous and high-throughput electromechanical lysis of bacterial pathogens using ion concentration polarization. Anal Chem. 2018;90:872–80.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03746.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Koolman J, Röhm K-H, Wirth J, Robertson M. Color atlas of biochemistry, vol. 2. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2005.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Kreyenschulte D, Krull R, Margaritis A. Recent advances in microbial biopolymer production and purification. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2014;34:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Kumar A, Awasthi A. Bioseparation engineering. India: IK International Pvt Ltd; 2009.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Lee S-M. The primary stages of protein recovery. J Biotechnol. 1989;11:103–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1656(89)90113-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Lee SY, et al. Evaluating self-buffering ionic liquids for biotechnological applications. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2015;3:3420–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Lee SY, Khoiroh I, Ling TC, Show PL. Aqueous two-phase flotation for the recovery of biomolecules. Sep Purif Rev. 2016;45:81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Lee HD, Lee MY, Hwang YS, Cho YH, Kim HW, Park HB. Separation and purification of lactic acid from fermentation broth using membrane-integrated separation processes. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2017a;56:8301–10.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b02011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Lee SY, Khoiroh I, Coutinho JA, Show PL, Ventura SP. Lipase production and purification by self-buffering ionic liquid-based aqueous biphasic systems. Process Biochem. 2017b;63:221–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Lee SY, Khoiroh I, Ling TC, Show PL. Enhanced recovery of lipase derived from Burkholderia cepacia from fermentation broth using recyclable ionic liquid/polymer-based aqueous two-phase systems. Sep Purif Technol. 2017c;179:152–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Lee SY, Khoiroh I, Ooi CW, Ling TC, Show PL. Recent advances in protein extraction using ionic liquid-based aqueous two-phase systems. Sep Purif Rev. 2017d;00:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15422119.2017.1279628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Lee SY, Show PL, Ling TC, Chang J-S. Single-step disruption and protein recovery from Chlorella vulgaris using ultrasonication and ionic liquid buffer aqueous solutions as extractive solvents. Biochem Eng J. 2017e;124:26–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2017.04.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Leong YK, Lan JC-W, Loh H-S, Ling TC, Ooi CW, Show PL. Cloud-point extraction of green-polymers from Cupriavidus necator lysate using thermoseparating-based aqueous two-phase extraction. J Biosci Bioeng. 2017;123:370–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2016.09.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Li M, Dong HR. The investigation on the aqueous two-phase floatation of lincomycin. Sep Purif Technol. 2010;73:208–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2010.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Li X, Wan J, Cao X. Preliminary application of light-pH sensitive recycling aqueous two-phase systems to purification of lipase. Process Biochem. 2010;45:598–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Lim SL, et al. Single-step purification of recombinant hepatitis B core antigen Y132A dimer from clarified Escherichia coli feedstock using a packed bed anion exchange chromatography. Process Biochem. 2018;69:208–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2018.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Lin HM, Chan EC, Chen C, Chen LF. Disintegration of yeast-cells by pressurized carbon-dioxide. Biotechnol Prog. 1991;7:201–4.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bp00009a001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Lin HM, Yang Z, Chen LF. An improved method for disruption of microbial cells with pressurized carbon dioxide. Biotechnol Prog. 1992;8:165–6.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bp00014a012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Ling Y, Williams D, Thomas C, Middelberg A. Recovery of poly-3-hydroxybutyrate from recombinant Escherichia coli by homogenization and centrifugation. Biotechnol Tech. 1997;11:409–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Linke D. Detergents: an overview. In: Methods in enzymology, vol. 463. London: Elsevier; 2009. p. 603–17.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Linke D, Berger RG. Foaming of proteins: new prospects for enzyme purification processes. J Biotechnol. 2011;152:125–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.07.022.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Liu B, Zhou X. Freeze-drying of proteins. In: Cryopreservation and freeze-drying protocols. New York: Springer; 2015. p. 459–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Lo SC, Ramanan RN, Tey BT, Tan WS, Show PL, Ling TC, Ooi CW. A versatile and economical method for the release of recombinant proteins from Escherichia coli by 1-propanol cell disruption. RSC Adv. 2016;6:62291–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Lockwood CE, Bummer PM, Jay M. Purification of proteins using foam fractionation. Pharm Res. 1997;14:1511–5.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012109830424.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    López-Abelairas M, García-Torreiro M, Lú-Chau T, Lema J, Steinbüchel A. Comparison of several methods for the separation of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) from Cupriavidus necator H16 cultures. Biochem Eng J. 2015;93:250–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Lu Y-M, Yang Y-Z, Zhao X-D, Xia C-B. Bovine serum albumin partitioning in polyethylene glycol (PEG)/potassium citrate aqueous two-phase systems. Food Bioprod Process. 2010;88:40–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Majekodunmi SO. A review on centrifugation in the pharmaceutical industry. Am J Biomed Eng. 2015;5:67–78.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Masomian M, Rahman RNZRA, Salleh AB, Basri M. A new thermostable and organic solvent-tolerant lipase from Aneurinibacillus thermoaerophilus strain HZ. Process Biochem. 2013;48:169–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2012.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    McMillan JR, Watson IA, Ali M, Jaafar W. Evaluation and comparison of algal cell disruption methods: microwave, waterbath, blender, ultrasonic and laser treatment. Appl Energy. 2013;103:128–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.09.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    McPherson A, Gavira JA. Introduction to protein crystallization. Acta Crystallogr Sect F: Struct Biol Commun. 2014;70:2–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Middelberg APJ. Process-scale disruption of microorganisms. Biotechnol Adv. 1995;13:491–551.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-9750(95)02007-p.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Milcent S, Carrère H. Clarification of lactic acid fermentation broths. Sep Purif Technol. 2001;22(23):393–401.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5866(00)00124-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Narasimhan S, Wilson JR, Martin E, Schachter H. A structural basis for four distinct elution profiles on concanavalin A–Sepharose affinity chromatography of glycopeptides. Can J Biochem. 1979;57:83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Neal G, Francis R, Shamlou PA, Keshavarz-Moore E. Separation of immunoglobulin G precipitate from contaminating proteins using microfiltration. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2004;39:241–8.  https://doi.org/10.1042/BA20030129.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Neu HC, Heppel LA. The release of enzymes from Kwherichia coli by osmotic shock and during the formation of Spheroplasts. J Biol Chem. 1965;240:3685–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Ng HS, Tan CP, Mokhtar MN, Ibrahim S, Ariff A, Ooi CW, Ling TC. Recovery of Bacillus cereus cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase and recycling of phase components in an aqueous two-phase system using thermo-separating polymer. Sep Purif Technol. 2012;89:9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Ng HS, Chai CXY, Chow YH, Loh WLC, Yim HS, Tan JS, Lan JC-W. Direct recovery of Bacillus subtilis xylanase from fermentation broth with an alcohol/salt aqueous biphasic system. J Biosci Bioeng. 2018;125:585–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2017.12.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Ooi CW, Tey BT, Hii SL, Kamal SMM, Lan JCW, Ariff A, Ling TC. Purification of lipase derived from Burkholderia pseudomallei with alcohol/salt-based aqueous two-phase systems. Process Biochem. 2009;44:1083–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2009.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Padilha GDS, Santana JCC, Alegre RM, Tambourgi EB. Extraction of lipase from Burkholderia cepacia by PEG/phosphate ATPS and its biochemical characterization. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2012;55:7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Page M, Thorpe R. Purification of IgG by precipitation with sodium sulfate or ammonium sulfate. In: The protein protocols handbook. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 1749–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Parekh S, Vinci V, Strobel R. Improvement of microbial strains and fermentation processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2000;54:287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Park P, Kim E, Chu K. Chemical disruption of yeast cells for the isolation of carotenoid pigments. Sep Purif Technol. 2007;53:148–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Pereira JFB, Vicente F, Santos-Ebinuma VC, Araújo JM, Pessoa A, Freire MG, Coutinho JAP. Extraction of tetracycline from fermentation broth using aqueous two-phase systems composed of polyethylene glycol and cholinium-based salts. Process Biochem. 2013;48:716–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2013.02.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Pessoa A, et al. Purification by affinity chromatography of recombinant L-asparaginase I from Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressed in Escherichia coli. New Biotechnol. 2014;31:S199–200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2014.05.962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Pierce J, Turner C, Keshavarz-Moore E, Dunnill P. Factors determining more efficient large-scale release of a periplasmic enzyme from E. coli using lysozyme. J Biotechnol. 1997;58:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Porto T, et al. Liquid–liquid extraction of proteases from fermented broth by PEG/citrate aqueous two-phase system. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif. 2008;47:716–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Prazeres DMF, Schluep T, Cooney C. Preparative purification of supercoiled plasmid DNA using anion-exchange chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 1998;806:31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Rey M, et al. Effective removal of nonionic detergents in protein mass spectrometry, hydrogen/deuterium exchange, and proteomics. Anal Chem. 2010;82:5107–16.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac100171m.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Rigaud JL, Levy D, Mosser G, Lambert O. Detergent removal by non-polar polystyrene beads - applications to membrane protein reconstitution and two-dimensional crystallization. Eur Biophys J Biophys Lett. 1998;27:305–19.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002490050138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Rodriguez M, Güereca L, Valle F, Quintero R, López-Munguia A. Penicillin acylase extraction by osmotic shock. Process Biochem. 1992;27:217–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-9592(92)80021-T.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Rothenberg MA, Nachmansohn D. Studies on cholinesterase III. Purification of the enzyme from electric tissue by fractional ammonium sulfate precipitation. J Biol Chem. 1947;168:223–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Salazar O, Asenjo JA. Enzymatic lysis of microbial cells. Biotechnol Lett. 2007;29:985–94.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-007-9345-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Salleh AB, Musani R, Basri M, Ampon K, Yunus WMZ, Razak CNA. Extracellular and intracellular lipases from a thermophilic rhizopus-oryzae and factors affecting their production. Can J Microbiol. 1993;39:978–81.  https://doi.org/10.1139/m93-147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Sampathkumar B, Khachatourians GG, Korber DR. High pH during trisodium phosphate treatment causes membrane damage and destruction of Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:122–9.  https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.69.1.122-129.2003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Sankaran R, Show PL, Lee SY, Yap YJ, Ling TC. Integration process of fermentation and liquid biphasic flotation for lipase separation from Burkholderia cepacia. Bioresour Technol. 2018;250:306–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Santos J, Belo I, Mota M, Cabral J. Freeze/thawing and sonication of Escherichia coli TB1 cells for cytochrome b5 recovery. Bioseparation. 1996;6:81–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Sauer T, Robinson CW, Glick BR. Disruption of native and recombinant escherichia-coli in a high-pressure homogenizer. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1989;33:1330–42.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260331016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Save S, Pandit A, Joshi J. Use of hydrodynamic cavitation for large scale microbial cell disruption. Food Bioprod Process. 1997;75:41–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Saxena A, Tripathi BP, Kumar M, Shahi VK. Membrane-based techniques for the separation and purification of proteins: an overview. Adv Colloid Interf Sci. 2009;145:1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2008.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Scawen MD, Hammond P. Downstream processing: protein extraction and purification Molocular biology and biotechnology. 4th ed. New York: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2000. p. 461–96.Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Schneider WC, Hogeboom GH. Cytochemical studies of mammalian tissues; the isolation of cell components by differential centrifugation: a review. Cancer Res. 1951;11:1–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Scorer CA, Buckholz RG, Clare JJ, Romanos MA. The intracellular production and secretion of HIV-1 envelope protein in the methylotrophic yeast pichia-pastoris. Gene. 1993;136:111–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(93)90454-b.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Sharma R, Dill BD, Chourey K, Shah M, VerBerkmoes NC, Hettich RL. Coupling a detergent lysis/cleanup methodology with intact protein fractionation for enhanced proteome characterization. J Proteome Res. 2012;11:6008–18.  https://doi.org/10.1021/pr300709k.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Show PL, et al. Recovery of lipase derived from Burkholderia cenocepacia ST8 using sustainable aqueous two-phase flotation composed of recycling hydrophilic organic solvent and inorganic salt. Sep Purif Technol. 2013;110:112–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.03.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Smith SM. Strategies for the purification of membrane proteins. In: Walls D, Loughran ST, editors. Protein chromatography: methods and protocols, Methods in molecular biology, vol. 1485. 2nd ed. Totowa: Humana Press Inc; 2017. p. 389–400.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6412-3_21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Sosnik A, Seremeta KP. Advantages and challenges of the spray-drying technology for the production of pure drug particles and drug-loaded polymeric carriers. Adv Colloid Interf Sci. 2015;223:40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Souza RL, Lima RA, Coutinho JAP, Soares CMF, Lima ÁS. Aqueous two-phase systems based on cholinium salts and tetrahydrofuran and their use for lipase purification. Sep Purif Technol. 2015a;155:118–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2015.05.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Souza RL, Lima RA, Coutinho JAP, Soares CMF, Lima ÁS. Novel aqueous two-phase systems based on tetrahydrofuran and potassium phosphate buffer for purification of lipase. Process Biochem. 2015b;50:1459–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2015.05.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Stein A, Kiesewetter A. Cation exchange chromatography in antibody purification: pH screening for optimised binding and HCP removal. J Chromatogr B. 2007;848:151–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Su C-K, Chiang BH. Partitioning and purification of lysozyme from chicken egg white using aqueous two-phase system. Process Biochem. 2006;41:257–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Su ZD, Guo Y, Peng ZY. Production of intracellular enzyme by corynebacterium-glutamicum T6-13 protoplasts immobilized in ca-alginate gels. Enzym Microb Technol. 1993;15:791–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Tang XC, Pikal MJ. Design of freeze-drying processes for pharmaceuticals: practical advice. Pharm Res. 2004;21:191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Taskova RM, Zorn H, Krings U, Bouws H, Berger RG. A comparison of cell wall disruption techniques for the isolation of intracellular metabolites from Pleurotus and Lepista sp. Zeitschrift Fur Naturforschung Sect C-a J Biosci. 2006;61:347–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Taubert J, Krings U, Berger RG. A comparative study on the disintegration of filamentous fungi. J Microbiol Methods. 2000;42:225–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7012(00)00194-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Tsyntsarski B, et al. Removal of detergents from water by adsorption on activated carbons obtained from various precursors. Desalin Water Treat. 2014;52:3445–52.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.801327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Van Reis R, Zydney A. Membrane separations in biotechnology. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2001;12:208–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    van Reis R, Zydney A. Bioprocess membrane technology. J Membr Sci. 2007;297:16–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Vandergriff A, Padhye V, Cheng K. Recombinant single chain variable fragment antibody production in Escherichia coli and purification with affinity chromatography using arista slice purification system. Protein Sci. 2016;25:169.Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    Ventura SPM, de Barros RLF, de Pinho Barbosa JM, Soares CMF, Lima ÁS, Coutinho JAP. Production and purification of an extracellular lipolytic enzyme using ionic liquid-based aqueous two-phase systems. Green Chem. 2012;14:734–40.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2gc16428k.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Vogels G, Kula MR. Combination of enzymatic and or thermal pretreatment with mechanical cell disintegration. Chem Eng Sci. 1992;47:123–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(92)80206-r.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Wacker M, Schubert R. From mixed micelles to liposomes: critical steps during detergent removal by membrane dialysis. Int J Pharm. 1998;162:171–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-5173(97)00425-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Wang A, Lewus R, Rathore AS. Comparison of different options for harvest of a therapeutic protein product from high cell density yeast fermentation broth. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006;94:91–104.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20816.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Wang W, Wan J, Ning B, Xia J, Cao X. Preparation of a novel light-sensitive copolymer and its application in recycling aqueous two-phase systems. J Chromatogr A. 2008;1205:171–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.07.074.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Wang Y, Liu Y, Han J, Hu S. Application of water-miscible alcohol-based aqueous two-phase Systems for Extraction of dyes. Sep Sci Technol. 2011a;46:1283–8.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2010.551168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Wang Y, Xu XH, Han J, Yan YS. Separation/enrichment of trace tetracycline antibiotics in water by [Bmim]BF4–(NH4)2SO4 aqueous two-phase solvent sublation. Desalination. 2011b;266:114–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.08.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Wang FQ, Liang JZ, Wang W, Fu DW, Xiao W. A new and efficient method for purification of poly-gamma-glutamic acid from high-viscosity fermentation broth. Trop J Pharm Res. 2017a;16:1267–75.  https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v16i6.9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Wang HB, Feng YR, Gui SQ, Zhang Y, Lu FP. A sample pretreatment method to suit the metabolomic analysis of Bacillus licheniformis based on GC-MS. Anal Methods. 2017b;9:2299–304.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ay00008a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Waszak M, Markowska-Szczupak A, Gryta M. Application of nanofiltration for production of 1, 3-propanediol in membrane bioreactor. Catal Today. 2016;268:164–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Wu C, Wang J, Pei Y, Wang H, Li Z. Salting-out effect of ionic liquids on poly(propylene glycol) (PPG): formation of PPG + ionic liquid aqueous two-phase systems. J Chem Eng Data. 2010;55:5004–8.  https://doi.org/10.1021/je100604m.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Yang S, Huang Z, Jiang Z, Li L. Partition and purification of a thermostable xylanase produced by Paecilomyces thermophila in solid-state fermentation using aqueous two-phase systems. Process Biochem. 2008;43:56–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Yang XM, Zhou SY, Li MS, Wang R, Zhao YJ. Purification of cellulase fermentation broth via low cost ceramic microfiltration membranes with nanofibers-like attapulgite separation layers. Sep Purif Technol. 2017;175:435–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.11.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Yeung Y-G, Nieves E, Angeletti RH, Stanley ER. Removal of detergents from protein digests for mass spectrometry analysis. Anal Biochem. 2008;382:135–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2008.07.034.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    Zhang LL, et al. Purification of transglutaminase from high salt culture by gel and Cation exchange chromatography Chinese. J Anal Chem. 2012;40:1225–30.  https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1096.2012.11275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Zhang S, et al. Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus proteinase: purification by ion-exchange and hydrophobic interaction chromatography. Int J Food Prop. 2015;18:1560–7.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2014.921199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    Zhao F, Yu J. L-Asparaginase release from Escherichia coli cells with K2HPO4 and triton X100. Biotechnol Prog. 2001;17:490–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. 166.
    Zhou YJ, Hu CL, Wang N, Zhang WW, Yu XQ. Purification of porcine pancreatic lipase by aqueous two-phase systems of polyethylene glycol and potassium phosphate. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2013;926:77–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2013.03.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  167. 167.
    Zou C, Duan XG, Wu J. Enhanced extracellular production of recombinant Bacillus deramificans pullulanase in Escherichia coli through induction mode optimization and a glycine feeding strategy. Bioresour Technol. 2014;172:174–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.035.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sze Ying Lee
    • 1
  • Kit Wayne Chew
    • 2
  • Pau Loke Show
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and ScienceUniversiti Tunku Abdul RahmanKajangMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of Nottingham Malaysia CampusSemenyihMalaysia

Personalised recommendations