Advertisement

Introduction: Putting Wacquant to Work

  • John Flint
  • Ryan PowellEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In this introduction we set out the Bourdieusian origins, key principles and theoretical syntheses characteristic of Wacquant’s distinct sociology, while also discussing some key criticisms. In doing so we suggest that Wacquant’s work contributes to a crucial bridge from a classical sociological perspective to the more contemporary approach of theoretical pluralism. We detail some of the core aspects and concepts of Wacquant’s theoretical framework in understanding relations of class, state and ethnicity within the contemporary, polarized cities of advanced capitalist societies. We also outline some specific criticisms of Wacquant’s work to date which resonate with the theme of this book.

References

  1. Aalbers, A. (2016). The financialization of housing. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, R. (2016). Limited exposure: Social concealment, mobility and engagement with public space by the super-rich in London. Environment and Planning A, 48(7), 1302–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, R., & Blandy, S. (2016). Domestic fortress. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson, R., Ferrari, E., Flint, J., Gore, T., & Lever, J. (2016). Loic Wacquant commentaries. People, Place and Policy Online, 10(2), 174–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1990 [1982]). Lecture on the lecture. In P. Bourdieu (Ed.), In other words: Essays toward a reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Burkitt, I. (2016). Relational agency: Relational sociology, agency and interaction. European Journal of Social Theory, 19(3), 322–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daems, T. (2008). Making sense of penal change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delica, K. N., & Hansen, C. S. (2016). Pillars in the works of Loic Wacquant: Against a fragmented reception. Thesis Eleven, 137(1), 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunning, E., & Hughes, J. (2012). Norbert Elias and modern sociology: Knowledge, interdependence, power, process. London: A&C Black.Google Scholar
  12. Elias, N. (1978). What is sociology? Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Elias, N. (1987). The retreat of sociologists into the present. Theory, Culture & Society, 4(2–3), 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flint, J. (2018) Encounters with the centaur state: Advanced urban marginality and the practices and ethics of welfare sanctions regimes. Urban Studies. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0042098017750070
  15. Galonnier, J. (2015). The enclave, the citadel and the ghetto: The threefold segregation of upper-class Muslims in India. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(1), 92–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goffman, E. (1968). Stigma: Notes on the management of a spoiled identity. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  17. Goudsblom, J. (1977). Sociology in the balance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Gupta, R. (2015). There must be some way out of here: Beyond a spatial conception of Muslim ghettoization in Mumbai? Ethnography, 16(3), 352–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hawking, S., & Mlodinow, L. (2011). The grand design. Random House Digital, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Hughes, J. (2013). Norbert Elias and the habits of good sociology. Human Figurations, 2(1). Retrieved from https://quod.lib.umich.edu/h/humfig.
  21. Jaffrelot, C., & Gayer, L. (Eds.). (2012). Muslims in Indian cities: Trajectories of marginalisation. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Joly, M. (2017a). La Révolution Sociologique. De la naissance d’un régime de pensée scientifique à la crise de la philosophie (XIXe-XXe siècles). La Découverte.Google Scholar
  23. Joly, M. (2017b). Une sociologie “postphilosophique”? Norbert Elias en dialogue avec Pierre Bourdieu. Zilsel, 2, 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kilminster, R. (1998). The sociological revolution: From the enlightenment to the global age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Kilminster, R. (2007). Norbert Elias: Post-philosophical sociology. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kilminster, R. (2013). Critique and over-critique in sociology. Human Figurations, 2(1). Retrieved from https://quod.lib.umich.edu/h/humfig.
  27. Law, A., & Mennell, S. (2017). Guest Editors’ introduction: Comparative-historical sociology as antidote to the “crackpot realism” of the twenty-first century. Human Figurations, 6(2). Retrieved from https://quod.lib.umich.edu/h/humfig.
  28. Lawhon, M., Silver, J., Ernstson, H., & Pierce, J. (2016). Unlearning (un)located ideas in the provincialization of urban theory. Regional Studies, 50(9), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Low, S. (2003). Behind the gates: Life, security, and the pursuit of happiness in fortress America. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Loyal, S. (2017). Bourdieu’s theory of the state: A critical introduction. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Paulle, B., van Heerikhuizen, B., & Emirbayer, M. (2012). Elias and Bourdieu. Journal of Classical Sociology, 12(1), 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shaxson, N. (2012). Treasure Islands. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  33. Squires, P., & Lea, J. (2013). Criminalisation and advanced marginality: Critically exploring the work of Loic Wacquant. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  34. Slater, T. (2017). Loic Wacquant. In R. Koch & A. Latham (Eds.), Key thinkers on cities. Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Susewind, R. (2017). Muslims in Indian cities: Degrees of segregation and the elusive ghetto. Environment and Planning A, 49(6), 1286–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vogl, J. (2017). The ascendancy of finance. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  37. Wacquant, L. (Forthcoming). Deadly Symbiosis: Race and the Rise of the Penal State. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  38. Wacquant, L. (2004a). Body and soul: Notebooks of an apprentice boxer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Wacquant, L. (2004b). Ghetto. In N. Smelser & P. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioural sciences (pp. 129–147). London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  40. Wacquant, L. (2004c). Decivilising and demonising: The social and symbolic remaking of the black ghetto. In S. Loyal & S. Quilley (Eds.), The sociology of Norbert Elias (pp. 95–121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Wacquant, L. (2004d). Critical thought as solvent of Doxa. Constellations, 11(1), 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wacquant, L. (2005). Nothing beyond its reach. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(49). Special section on the Centennial of the American Sociological Association (12 August): B14.Google Scholar
  43. Wacquant, L. (2007). Territorial stigmatization in the age of advanced marginality. Thesis Eleven, 91, 66–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wacquant, L. (2008a). Urban outcasts. London: Polity.Google Scholar
  45. Wacquant, L. (2008b). Ghettos and anti-ghettos: An anatomy of the new urban poverty. Thesis Eleven, 94, 113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wacquant, L. (2009a). Punishing the poor. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wacquant, L. (2009b). The body, the ghetto and the penal state. Qualitative Sociology, 32, 101–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wacquant, L. (2010). Crafting the neoliberal state: Workfare, prisonfare, and social security. Sociological Forum, 25(2), 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wacquant, L. (2012). A Janus-faced institution of ethnoracial closure: A sociological specification of the ghetto. In R. Hutchison & B. Haynes (Eds.), The ghetto: Contemporary global issues and controversies (pp. 1–32). Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  50. Wacquant, L. (2013a). Class, ethnicity and state in the making of marginality: Revisiting “Urban Outcasts”. Dansk Sociologi, 24(1), 33–47.Google Scholar
  51. Wacquant, L. (2013b). The wedding of workfare and prisonfare in the 21st century: Responses to critics and commentators. In P. Squires & J. Lea (Eds.), Criminalisation and advanced marginality: Critically exploring the work of Loic Wacquant (pp. 243–257). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  52. Wacquant, L. (2014). Marginality, ethnicity and penality in the neo-liberal city: An analytic cartography. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(10), 1687–1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wacquant, L. (2018a). Bourdieu comes to town: Pertinence, principles, applications. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 42(1), 90–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wacquant, L. (2018b). Four transversal principles for putting Bourdieu to work. Anthropological Theory, 18(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wacquant, L., & Akçaoğlu, A. (2017). Practice and symbolic power in Bourdieu: The view from Berkeley. Journal of Classical Sociology, 17(1), 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wacquant, L., Slater, T., & Pereira, V. B. (2014). Territorial stigmatization in action. Environment and Planning A, 46(6), 1270–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Urban Studies and PlanningUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations