Advertisement

The Nature of Traditional Criminal Law

  • Merita Kettunen
Chapter
Part of the Comparative, European and International Criminal Justice book series (CEICJ, volume 2)

Abstract

Defining crime or criminal law is a difficult task. From a legalistic perspective, one could simply state that crime is conduct that is punishable by law. Building on such an approach, criminal law could be defined, in a circular manner, as ‘a branch of law which deals with those acts, attempts and omissions of which the state may take cognisance by prosecution in the criminal courts’. This kind of legalistic or positivistic definition does not say much about the nature of criminal law.

References

  1. Andenaes J (1974) Punishment and deterrence. The University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashworth A (2003) Principles of criminal law, 4th edn. OUPGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashworth A, Zedner L (2008) Defending the criminal law: reflections on the changing character of crime, procedure, and sanctions. Crim Law Philos 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashworth A, Zedner L (2014a) Preventive justice. OUPGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashworth A, Zedner L (2014b) The role of preventive state. In: Simester A, du Bois-Pedain A, Neumann U (eds) Liberal criminal theory. Hart PublishingGoogle Scholar
  6. Asp P, Magnus U, Nils J (2013) Kriminalrättens grunder. Iustus FörlagGoogle Scholar
  7. Beccaria C (1764) Rikoksesta ja rangaistuksesta, Kai Heikkilä tr, Edita 1998, the original ‘Dei delitti e delle peneGoogle Scholar
  8. Binder G (2002) Punishment theory: moral or political? Buffalo Crim Law Rev 5(2)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dagger R (2011) Republicanism and the foundations of criminal law. In: Duff RA, Green SP (eds) Philosophical foundations of criminal law. OUPGoogle Scholar
  10. Dolinko D (2014) Punishment. In: Deigh J, Dolinko D (eds) The Oxford handbook of philosophy of criminal law. OUPGoogle Scholar
  11. du Bois-Pedain A (2014) Criminal law theory in the constitutional state. In: Simester A, du Bois-Pedain A, Neumann U (eds) Liberal criminal theory. Hart PublishingGoogle Scholar
  12. Duff A (1986) Trials and punishments. CUPGoogle Scholar
  13. Duff A (2003) Punishment, communication, and community. OUPGoogle Scholar
  14. Farmer L (1996) The obsession with definition: the nature of crime and critical legal theory. Soc Leg Stud 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feinberg J (1970) The expressive function of punishment. In: Feinberg J (ed) Doing & deserving: essays in the theory of responsibility. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  16. Fletcher GP (1998) Basic concepts of criminal law. OUPGoogle Scholar
  17. Fletcher GP (2000) The nature and function of criminal theory. Calif Law Rev 88(3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fletcher GP (2007) The grammar of criminal law: American, comparative and international, volume one: foundations. OUPGoogle Scholar
  19. Foster C (2011) Human dignity in bioethics and law. Hart publishingGoogle Scholar
  20. Garland D (1996) The limits of the sovereign state: strategies of crime control in contemporary society. Br J Criminol 36(4)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gordon GH (1978) The criminal law of Scotland, 2nd edn. W.Green & Son LtdGoogle Scholar
  22. Hart HLA (1958) Positivism and the separation of law and morals. Harv Law Rev 71(4)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hart HLA (1992) Punishment and responsibility: essays in the philosophy of law. Clarendon Press, first published in 1968Google Scholar
  24. Hassemer W (1989) Symbolinen rikosoikeus ja oikeushyvien suojelu. Oikeus 18(5)Google Scholar
  25. Hill T (1999) Kant on wrongdoing, desert, and punishment. Law Philos 18Google Scholar
  26. Hoffman J, Graham P (2009) Introduction to political theory, 2nd edn. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Hörnle T, Kremnitzer M (2011) Human dignity as a protected interest in criminal law. Isr Law Rev 44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Husak DN (2002) Limitations on criminalization and the general part of criminal law. In: Shute S, Simester AP (eds) Criminal law theory: doctrines of the general part. OUPGoogle Scholar
  29. Jareborg N (2002) Scraps of penal theory. Iustus FörlagGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaplow L, Shavell S (2003) Fairness versus welfare: notes on the pareto principle, preferences, and distributive justice. J Leg Stud 32(1)Google Scholar
  31. Klip A (2016) European criminal law: an integrative approach, 3rd edn. IntersentiaGoogle Scholar
  32. Lacey N (1988) State punishment. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  33. Lacey N (1995) Contingency and criminalisation. In: Loveland I (ed) Frontiers of criminality. Sweet & MaxwellGoogle Scholar
  34. Lacey N (2013) What constitutes criminal law? In: Duff RA, Farmer L, Marshall SE, Renzo M, Tardos V (eds) The constitution of the criminal law. OUPGoogle Scholar
  35. Lappi-Seppälä T (1994) Miksi rikosoikeus? In: Hirvonen A (ed) Kohti 2000-luvun rikosoikeutta. Helsingin yliopiston rikos- ja prosessioikeuden laitoksen julkaisuja A:8Google Scholar
  36. Lappi-Seppälä T (2000) Rikosten seuraamukset (WSLT 2000)Google Scholar
  37. Lessnoff M (1971) Two justifications of punishment. Philos Q 21(83)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marshall SE, Duff RA (1998) Criminalization and sharing values. Can J Law Jurisprud XI(1)Google Scholar
  39. Melander S (2007) Nordic criminal justice policy – single path or separate ways? In: Husa J, Nuotio K, Pihlajamäki H (eds) Nordic law – between tradition and dynamism. IntersentiaGoogle Scholar
  40. Melander S (2008) Kriminalisointiteoria – rangaistavaksi säätämisen oikeudelliset rajoitukset. Suomalaisen lakimiesyhdistyksen julkaisujaGoogle Scholar
  41. Melander S (2013) Ultima ratio in European criminal law. Oñati Socio-Leg Ser 3(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mill JS (1974) In: Himmelfarb G (ed) On liberty. Penguin Books, first published 1859Google Scholar
  43. Mill JS (1979) Utilitarianism. Hackett Publishing Company, first published 1863Google Scholar
  44. Murphy JG (1987) Does Kant have a theory of punishment? Columbia Law Rev 87(3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Neumann U (2014) The ‘deserved’ punishment. In: Simester A, Du Bois-Pedain A, Neumann U (eds) Liberal criminal theory: essays for Andreas von Hirsch. Hart PublishingGoogle Scholar
  46. Nuotio K (2007) Participation in crime in Nordic criminal laws: variations on a theme. In: Husa J, Nuotio K, Pihlajamäki H (eds) Nordic law – between tradition and dynamism. IntersentiaGoogle Scholar
  47. Nuotio K (2010) Theories of criminalization & the limits of criminal law. In: Duff RA, Farmer L, Marshall SE, Renzo M, Tadros V (eds) The boundaries of the criminal law. OUPGoogle Scholar
  48. Nuotio K (2014a) Between denial and recognition: criminal law and cultural diversity. In: Kymlicka W, Lernestedt C, Matravers M (eds) Criminal law and cultural diversity. OUPGoogle Scholar
  49. Nuotio K (2014b) European criminal law. In: Dubber MD, Hörnle T (eds) The Oxford handbook of criminal law. OUPGoogle Scholar
  50. Oppenheim L (1912) International law, a treatis, vol 1, 2nd edn. Longmans, Green, and CoGoogle Scholar
  51. Peters A (2009) Humanity as the A and the Ω of sovereignty. Eur J Int Law 20(3)Google Scholar
  52. Preuss UK (2010) Disconnecting constitutions from statehood – is global constitutionalism a viable concept. In: Dobner P, Loughlin M (eds) The twilight of constitutionalism? OUPGoogle Scholar
  53. Rawls J (1995) Two concepts of rules. Philos Rev 64(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Robinson PH (1994) A functional analysis of criminal law. Northwest Univ Law Rev 88Google Scholar
  55. Russell CL (2007) Tripartite structures of criminal law in Germany and other civil law jurisdictions. Cardozo Law Rev 28(6)Google Scholar
  56. Thorburn M (2011) Criminal law as public law. In: Duff RA, Green SP (eds) Philosophical foundations of criminal law. OUPGoogle Scholar
  57. Tuori K (2013) Ultima ratio as a constitutional principle. Oñati Socio-Leg Ser 3(1)Google Scholar
  58. von Hirsch A (2003) Censure and sanctions. Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
  59. Walker N (1998) Sovereignty and differentiated integration in the European Union. Eur Law J 4(4)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Walker N (2002) The idea of constitutional pluralism. Mod Law Rev 65(3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Walker N (2003) Preface. In: Walker N (ed) Sovereignty in transition. Hart PublishingGoogle Scholar
  62. Weber M (1978) Economy and society: an outline of interpretative sociology. University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  63. Wessels J, Beulke W (2012) Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil: Die Straftat und ihr Aufbau. C.F. MüllerGoogle Scholar
  64. Whitman JQ (2003–2004) Between self-defense and vengeance/between social contract and monopoly of violence. Tulsa Law Rev 39Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland and G. Giappichelli Editore 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Merita Kettunen
    • 1
  1. 1.HelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations