Advertisement

Toward a Rule-Breaking Managerial Framework

  • Ann-Kathrin Veenendaal
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Abstract

The findings from the eight sports cases are extrapolated from the domain of sports to the managerial context, specifically to the overlapping domains of creativity and innovation. Each of the 21 cross-case insights from Chap.  2 is linked to corresponding scholarly discussions by comparing the present empirical findings to existing research. Additionally, normative recommendations for strategic actions, derived from the case-based insights, describe how firms can help individual employees in the process of rule-breaking behavior. The key insights are visualized in the Framework of Rule-Breaking Market Behavior that contains a precis of the findings.

References

  1. Abernathy WJ, Clark KB (1985) Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction. Res Policy 14(1):3–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(85)90021-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akerlof GA (1970) The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q J Econ 84(3):488–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alba JW (2012) In defense of bumbling. J Consum Res 38(6):981–987.  https://doi.org/10.1086/661230 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amabile TM (1983) The social psychology of creativity: a componential conceptualization. J Pers Soc Psychol 45(2):357–376.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL (eds) Research in organizational behavior, vol 10. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp 123–167Google Scholar
  6. Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in context. Westview Press, Boulder, COGoogle Scholar
  7. Amabile TM (2012) Componential theory of creativity. Working Paper 12-096. Harvard Business School, Boston, https://www.hbs.edu
  8. Amabile TM, Mueller JS (2008) Studying creativity, its processes, and its antecedents: an exploration of the componential theory of creativity. In: Zhou J, Shalley CE (eds) Handbook of organizational creativity. Lawrence Erlbaum, New York, NY, pp 33–64Google Scholar
  9. Amabile TM, Pratt MG (2016) The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: making progress, making meaning. Res Organ Behav 36:157–183.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, Lazenby J, Herron M (1996) Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad Manag J 39(5):1154–1184.  https://doi.org/10.5465/256995 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Anderson NR, West MA (1998) Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. J Organ Behav 19(3):235–258.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<235::AID-JOB837>3.0.CO;2-C CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Anderson N, Dreu CKWD, Nijstad BA (2004) The routinization of innovation research: a constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. J Organ Behav 25(2):147–173.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Anderson N, Potočnik K, Zhou J (2014) Innovation and creativity in organizations: a state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. J Manag 40(5):1297–1333.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Andriopoulos C (2001) Determinants of organisational creativity: a literature review. Manag Decis 39(10):834–841.  https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740110402328 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Andriopoulos C, Lewis MW (2010) Managing innovation paradoxes: ambidexterity lessons from leading product design companies. Long Range Plan 43(1):104–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Appelt KC, Milch KF, Handgraaf MJJ, Weber EU (2011) The decision making individual differences inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research. Judgm Decis Mak 6(3):252–262Google Scholar
  17. Ariely D, Gneezy U, Loewenstein G, Mazar N (2009) Large stakes and big mistakes. Rev Econ Stud 76(2):451–469.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00534.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Armstrong SJ, Cools E, Sadler-Smith E (2012) Role of cognitive styles in business and management: reviewing 40 years of research. Int J Manag Rev 14(3):238–262.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00315.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ashton K (2015) How to fly a horse: the secret history of creation, invention, and discovery. Doubleday, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  20. Atuahene-Gima K (2005) Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation. J Mark 69(4):61–83.  https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.61 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Baas M, De Dreu CKW, Nijstad BA (2008) A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychol Bull 134(6):779–806.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012815 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Baer M (2012) Putting creativity to work: the implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Acad Manag J 55(5):1102–1119.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0470 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Baer M, Oldham GR (2006) The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. J Appl Psychol 91(4):963–970.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.963 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bateson G (1972 [1955]) Steps to an ecology of mind. Ballantine, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  25. BBC World Service (2011) The Fosbury Flop [audio podcast]. https://www.bbc.co.uk. Accessed 12 Oct 2017
  26. Beckhard AJ (2015) 15 worst tech predictions of all time. Forbes, January 5, https://www.forbes.com
  27. Bennett VM, Snyder J (2017) The empirics of learning from failure. Strateg Sci 2(1):1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2016.0020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Bergson H (1911) Laughter: an essay on the meaning of the comic (trans: Brereton CSH, Rothwell F). Macmillan, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  29. Bhanji JP, Beer JS (2012) Taking a different perspective: mindset influences neural regions that represent value and choice. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 7(7):782–793.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Billig M (2005) Laughter and ridicule: towards a social critique of humour. Sage, Loughborough University, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Bledow R, Frese M, Anderson N, Erez M, Farr J (2009a) A dialectic perspective on innovation: conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Ind Organ Psychol 2(3):305–337.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01154.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Bledow R, Frese M, Anderson N, Erez M, Farr J (2009b) Extending and refining the dialectic perspective on innovation: there is nothing as practical as a good theory; nothing as theoretical as a good practice. Ind Organ Psychol 2(3):363–373.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01161.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Blomberg A, Kallio T, Pohjanpää H (2017) Antecedents of organizational creativity: drivers, barriers or both. J Innovat Manag 5(1):78–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Boh WF, Evaristo R, Ouderkirk A (2014) Balancing breadth and depth of expertise for innovation: a 3M story. Res Policy 43(2):349–366.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Bowen DE, Ledford GE, Nathan BR (1991) Hiring for the organization, not the job. Executive 5(4):35–51.  https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1991.4274747 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Bradler C, Neckermann S, Warnke A (2016) Incentivizing creativity: a large-scale experiment with tournaments and gifts. Discussion Paper No. 16-040. ZEW – Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung [Center for European Economic Research], http://ftp.zew.de
  37. Bretz RD, Ash RA, Dreher GF (1989) Do people make the place? An examination of the attraction-selection-attrition hypothesis. Pers Psychol 42(3):561–581.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1989.tb00669.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Brose A (2018) Törnqvist serving an enlightened coffee experience in Hamburg. https://www.europeancoffeetrip.com. Accessed 21 Jun 2018
  39. Bunderson JS, Sutcliffe KM (2002) Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: process and performance effects. Acad Manag J 45(5):875–893.  https://doi.org/10.5465/3069319 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Burke K (1937) Attitudes toward history. The New Republic, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  41. Büschgens T, Bausch A, Balkin DB (2013) Organizational culture and innovation: a meta-analytic review. J Prod Innov Manag 30(4):763–781.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Byron K, Khazanchi S (2012) Rewards and creative performance: a meta-analytic test of theoretically derived hypotheses. Psychol Bull 138(4):809–830.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027652 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Byron K, Khazanchi S, Nazarian D (2010) The relationship between stressors and creativity: a meta-analysis examining competing theoretical models. J Appl Psychol 95(1):201–212.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017868 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Cable DM, Parsons CK (2001) Socialization tactics and person-organization fit. Pers Psychol 54(1):1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00083.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. CAIB (2003) Columbia accident investigation board report. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. https://www.nasa.gov/columbia/home/CAIB_Vol1.html Google Scholar
  46. Caldwell SD, Herold DM, Fedor DB (2004) Toward an understanding of the relationships among organizational change, individual differences, and changes in person-environment fit: a cross-level study. J Appl Psychol 89(5):868–882.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.868 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Calhoun C (2004, Summer) “Accidental wisdom” [Review of the book The travels and adventures of serendipity, by R. Merton and E Barber] Book Forum 11(2)Google Scholar
  48. Cameron KS (1984) The effectiveness of ineffectiveness. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL (eds) Research in organizational behavior, vol 6. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp 235–285Google Scholar
  49. Caniëls MCJ, De Stobbeleir K, De Clippeleer I (2014) The antecedents of creativity revisited: a process perspective. Creat Innov Manag 23(2):96–110.  https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Cantzen R (2018) Immer dasselbe – Anmerkungen zur Gewohnheit [Always the same – notes on habits, audio podcast]. https://www.br.de/mediathek/podcast/radiowissen/immer-dasselbe-anmerkungen-zur-gewohnheit/33293. Accessed 23 Jun 2018
  51. Card SK, Mackinlay JD, Shneiderman B (1999) Readings in information visualization: using vision to think. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  52. Cerasoli CP, Nicklin JM, Ford MT (2014) Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: a 40-year meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 140(4):980–1008.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035661 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Chan D (1996) Cognitive misfit of problem-solving style at work: a facet of person-organization fit. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 68(3):194–207.  https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Chan M-pS, Jones CR, Jamieson KH, Albarracín D (2017) Debunking: a meta-analysis of the psychological efficacy of messages countering misinformation. Psychol Sci 28(11):1531–1546.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617714579 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Chase WG, Simon HA (1973) Perception in chess. Cogn Psychol 4(1):55–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Chatman JA (1989) Improving interactional organizational research: a model of person-organization fit. Acad Manag Rev 14(3):333–349.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Chi MTH, Feltovich PJ, Glaser R (1981) Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cogn Sci 5(2):121–152.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Choi JN, Anderson TA, Veillette A (2009) Contextual inhibitors of employee creativity in organizations: the insulating role of creative ability. Group Org Manag 34(3):330–357.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601108329811 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Christgau J (1999) The origins of the jump shot: eight men who shook the world of basketball. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NEGoogle Scholar
  60. Churchland PM (1988) Perceptual plasticity and theoretical neutrality: a reply to Jerry Fodor. Philos Sci 55(2):167–187.  https://doi.org/10.1086/289425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Clancy A, Vince R, Gabriel Y (2012) That unwanted feeling: a psychodynamic study of disappointment in organizations. Br J Manag 23(4):518–531.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00780.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Clarke AC (1979) Hazards of prophecy. New Scientist Magazine – Seventies Scientist, 20/27 December, p 18Google Scholar
  63. Claudy MC, Garcia R, O’Driscoll A (2015) Consumer resistance to innovation – a behavioral reasoning perspective. J Acad Mark Sci 43(4):528–544.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0399-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Cohendet PS, Simon LO (2016) Always playable: recombining routines for creative efficiency at Ubisoft Montreal‘s video game studio. Organ Sci 27(3):614–632.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Conti R, Collins MA, Picariello ML (2001) The impact of competition on intrinsic motivation and creativity: considering gender, gender segregation and gender role orientation. Personal Individ Differ 31(8):1273–1289.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00217-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Cornelissen JP, Durand R (2012) More than just novelty: conceptual blending and causality. Acad Manag Rev 37(1):152–154.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Cornelissen JP, Durand R (2014) Moving forward: developing theoretical contributions in management studies. J Manag Stud 51(6):995–1022.  https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Cornelissen JP, Werner MD (2014) Putting framing in perspective: a review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. Acad Manag Ann 8(1):181–235.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2014.875669 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR (2008) The revised neo personality inventory (neo-pi-r). In: Boyle GJ, Matthews G, Saklofske DH (eds) The Sage handbook of personality theory and assessment, vol 2. Personality measurement and testing. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 179–198.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200479.n9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Crease RP (1989) Righting the antibiotic record. Science 246(4932):883–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Creed WED, Langstraat JA, Scully MA (2002) A picture of the frame: frame analysis as technique and as politics. Organ Res Methods 5(1):34–55.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428102051004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Crossan MM, Lane HW, White RE (1999) An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Acad Manag Rev 24(3):522–537.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2202135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Csikszentmihalyi M (1999) Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In: Sternberg RJ (ed) Handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 313–335Google Scholar
  74. Cue (n.d.) In Oxford English Dictionary. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/cue. Accessed 21 Jun 2018
  75. Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  76. Daft RL, Weick KE (1984) Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad Manag Rev 9(2):284–295.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277657 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Damanpour F (1991) Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad Manag J 34(3):555–590.  https://doi.org/10.5465/256406 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Damanpour F (2010) An integration of research findings of effects of firm size and market competition on product and process innovations. Br J Manag 21(4):996–1010.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00628.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Damanpour F, Aravind D (2012) Managerial innovation: conceptions, processes, and antecedents. Manag Organ Rev 8(2):423–454.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00233.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Dane E (2010) Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: a cognitive entrenchment perspective. Acad Manag Rev 35(4):579–603.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.4.zok579 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Davis MS (1971) That‘s interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philos Soc Sci 1(2):309–344.  https://doi.org/10.1177/004839317100100211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Davis MA (2009) Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity: a meta-analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 108(1):25–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM (2011) Rotating leadership and collaborative innovation: recombination processes in symbiotic relationships. Adm Sci Q 56(2):159–201.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839211428131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Dawkins R (1998) Unweaving the rainbow: science, delusion and the appetite for wonder. Allen Lane, LondonGoogle Scholar
  85. De Bono E (1995) Serious creativity. J Qual Particip 18(5):12–18Google Scholar
  86. De Castro JO, Brigham KH (2003) Entrepreneurial fit: the role of cognitive misfit. In: Katz JA, Shepherd DA (eds) Cognitive approaches to entrepreneurship research, vol 6. Emerald Group, Bingley, pp 37–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-7540(03)06003-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Dizikes J (2000) Yankee doodle dandy: the life and times of Tod Sloan. Yale University Press, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  88. Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res Policy 11(3):147–162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(8290016-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Drazin R, Glynn MA, Kazanjian RK (1999) Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: a sensemaking perspective. Acad Manag Rev 24(2):286–307.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1893937 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Duhigg C (2012) The power of habit: Why we do what we do in life and business. Random House, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  91. Dusya V, Crossan M (2005) Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organ Sci 16(3):203–224.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Edmondson AC (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm Sci Q 44(2):350–383.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Edmondson AC (2011) Strategies for learning from failure. Harv Bus Rev 89(4):48–55Google Scholar
  94. Eisenberger R, Cameron J (1996) Detrimental effects of reward: reality or myth? Am Psychol 51(11):1153–1166.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.11.1153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Eisenhardt KM (1989) Agency theory: an assessment and review. Acad Manag Rev 14(1):57–74.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Eisenhardt KM, Santos FM (2006) Knowledge-based view: a new theory of strategy? In: Pettigrew A, Thomas H, Whittington R (eds) Handbook of strategy and management. Sage, London, pp 139–164.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608313.n7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Ellen PS, Bearden WO, Sharma S (1991) Resistance to technological innovations: an examination of the role of self-efficacy and performance satisfaction. J Acad Mark Sci 19(4):297–307.  https://doi.org/10.1177/009207039101900401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Eppler MJ, Bresciani S (2013) Visualization in management: from communication to collaboration. A response to Zhang. J Vis Lang Comput 24(2):146–149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2012.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Erat S, Gneezy U (2016) Incentives for creativity. Exp Econ 19(2):269–280.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-015-9440-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Eyal N (2015) People don’t want something truly new, they want the familiar done differently Entrepreneur, June 18, https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/247467
  101. Fagerberg J (2006) Innovation: a guide to the literature. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery DC (eds) The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Feist GJ (1998) A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 2(4):290–309.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Fine GA, Deegan JG (1996) Three principles of Serendip: insight, chance, and discovery in qualitative research. Int J Qual Stud Educ 9(4):434–447.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839960090405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Manag Sci 47(1):117–132.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.1.117.10671 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Ford CM (1996) A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Acad Manag Rev 21(4):1112–1142.  https://doi.org/10.2307/259166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Ford JD, Ford LW, D’Amelio A (2008) Resistance to change: the rest of the story. Acad Manag Rev 33(2):362–377.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Förster J, Liberman N (2007) Knowledge activation. In: Kruglanski A, Higgins ET (eds) Social psychology: handbook of basic principles. 2nd edn. Guilford, New York, NY, pp 201–231Google Scholar
  108. Frijda NH (1993) Moods, emotion episodes, and emotions. In: Lewis M, Haviland JM (eds) Handbook of emotions. Guilford, New York, NY, pp 381–403Google Scholar
  109. Fury S (2016) Rise and fire: the origins, science, and evolution of the jump shot – and how it transformed basketball forever. Macmillan, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  110. Galinsky AD, Kray LJ (2004) From thinking about what might have been to sharing what we know: the effects of counterfactual mind-sets on information sharing in groups. J Exp Soc Psychol 40(5):606–618.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Galinsky AD, Moskowitz GB (2000) Counterfactuals as behavioral primes: priming the simulation heuristic and consideration of alternatives. J Exp Soc Psychol 36(4):384–409.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1409 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Galinsky AD, Moskowitz GB, Skurnik I (2000) Counterfactuals as self-generated primes: the effect of prior counterfactual activation on person perception judgments. Soc Cogn 18(3):252–280.  https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2000.18.3.252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Garcia R, Bardhi F, Friedrich C (2007) Overcoming consumer resistance to innovation. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 48(4):82–88Google Scholar
  114. Garfinkel H (1967) Study in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  115. Genius (2018) In Encyclopædia Britannica. https://academic.eb.com. Accessed 20 Jun 2018
  116. George JM (2007) Creativity in organizations. Acad Manag Ann 1(1):439–477.  https://doi.org/10.1080/078559814 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. George JM, Zhou J (2007) Dual tuning in a supportive context: joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Acad Manag J 50(3):605–622.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.25525934 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Giorgi S (2017) The mind and heart of resonance: the role of cognition and emotions in frame effectiveness. J Manag Stud 54(5):711–738.  https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Girma H (2017) Break down disability barriers to spur growth and innovation. Financial Times, September 13, https://www.ft.com
  120. Glaser VL (2017) Design performances: how organizations inscribe artifacts to change routines. Acad Manag J 60(6):2126–2154.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0842 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Glăveanu VP (2012) Habitual creativity: revising habit, reconceptualizing creativity. Rev Gen Psychol 16(1):78–92.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026611 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Glăveanu VP (2017) Thinking through creativity and culture: toward an integrated model. Routledge, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Goffman E (1974) Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  124. Goldenberg J, Lowengart O, Oreg S, Bar-Eli M, Epstein S, Fosbury RD (2004) Innovation: the case of the fosbury flop. Marketing Science Institute (MSI) Reports Working Papers Series, No 04-106. https://www.msi.org
  125. Gollwitzer PM (1990) Action phases and mind-sets. In: Higgins ET, Sorrentino RM (eds) Handbook of motivation and cognition: foundations of social behavior, vol 2. Guilford, New York, NY, pp 53–92Google Scholar
  126. Gollwitzer PM, Bayer U (1999) Deliberative versus implemental mindsets in the control of action. In: Chaiken S, Trope Y (eds) Dual-process theories in social psychology. Guilford, New York, NY, pp 403–422Google Scholar
  127. Gollwitzer PM, Kinney RF (1989) Effects of deliberative and implemental mind-sets on illusion of control. J Pers Soc Psychol 56(4):531–542.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.4.531 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Gollwitzer PM, Moskowitz GB (1996) Goal effects on action and cognition. In: Higgins ET, Kruglanski A (eds) Social psychology: handbook of basic principles. Guilford, New York, NY, pp 361–399Google Scholar
  129. Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P (2006) Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 38:69–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Gollwitzer PM, Heckhausen H, Steller B (1990) Deliberative and implemental mind-sets: cognitive tuning toward congruous thoughts and information. J Pers Soc Psychol 59(6):1119–1127.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J 17(S2):109–122.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Gregson J (2014) Reframing. Encyclopedia of humor studies. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483346175.n278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Grewell G (2013) Rhetoric of ridicule. Doctoral dissertation. University of Arizona. https://www.arizona.edu
  134. Griffith BC, Mullins NC (1972) Coherent social groups in scientific change. Science 177(4053):959–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Gross DP (2016) Creativity under fire: the effects of competition on creative production. Working Paper 16-109. Harvard Business School, Boston. https://www.hbs.edu
  136. Haas MR, Ham W (2015) Microfoundations of knowledge recombination: peripheral knowledge and breakthrough innovation in teams. In: Gavetti G, Ocasio W (eds) Cognition and strategy (Advances in strategic management, 32). Emerald, Bingley, pp 47–87.  https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-332220150000032002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Hambrick DC, Cho TS, Chen M-J (1996) The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Adm Sci Q 41(4):659–684.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2393871 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Hamel G (1996) Strategy as revolution. Harv Bus Rev 74(4):69–82Google Scholar
  139. Hammond MM, Neff NL, Farr JL, Schwall AR, Zhao X (2011) Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts 5(1):90–105.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018556 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Hargadon AB, Douglas Y (2001) When innovations meet institutions: edison and the design of the electric light. Adm Sci Q 46(3):476–501.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3094872 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Harrison SH, Rouse ED (2014) Let’s dance! Elastic coordination in creative group work: a qualitative study of modern dancers. Acad Manag J 57(5):1256–1283.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0343 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Hauser J, Tellis GJ, Griffin A (2006) Research on innovation: a review and agenda for marketing science. Mark Sci 25(6):687–717.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1050.0144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Hegarty M (2011) The cognitive science of visual-spatial displays: implications for design. Top Cogn Sci 3(3):446–474.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01150.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Henderson K (1991) Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Sci Technol Hum Values 16(4):448–473.  https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399101600402 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Hennessey BA, Amabile TM (2010) Creativity. Annu Rev Psychol 61(1):569–598.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Hillman AJ, Keim GD, Schuler D (2004) Corporate political activity: a review and research agenda. J Manag 30(6):837–857.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Hirt ER, Kardes FR, Markman KD (2004) Activating a mental simulation mind-set through generation of alternatives: implications for debiasing in related and unrelated domains. J Exp Soc Psychol 40(3):374–383.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.07.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Homburg C, Fürst A (2007) See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil: a study of defensive organizational behavior towards customer complaints. J Acad Mark Sci 35(4):523–536.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-006-0009-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Huber GP (1991) Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organ Sci 2(1):88–115.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Hülsheger UR, Anderson N, Salgado JF (2009) Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. J Appl Psychol 94(5):1128–1145.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015978 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Hymes D (1974) Foundations in sociolinguistics: an ethnographic approach. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  152. Internet Hall of Fame (n.d.) Vint Cerf. https://internethalloffame.org/inductees/vint-cerf. Accessed 21 Jun 2018
  153. Isaksen SG, Kaufmann AH, Bakken BT (2016) An examination of the personality constructs underlying dimensions of creative problem-solving style. J Creative Behav 50(4):268–281.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.75 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Isen AM (1999a) On the relationship between affect and creative problem solving. In: Russ SW (ed) Affect, creative experience, and psychological adjustment. Brunner/Mazel, Philadelphia, PA, pp 3–17Google Scholar
  155. Isen AM (1999b) Positive affect. In: Dalgleish T, Power MJ (eds) Handbook of cognition and emotion. Wiley, New York, NY, pp 521–539.  https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013494.ch25 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Isen AM, Johnson MM, Mertz E, Robinson GF (1985) The influence of positive affect on the unusualness of word associations. J Pers Soc Psychol 48(6):1413–1426.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1413 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Isen AM, Daubman KA, Nowicki GP (1987) Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. J Pers Soc Psychol 52(6):1122–1131.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Janes LM, Olson JM (2000) Jeer pressure: the behavioral effects of observing ridicule of others. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 26(4):474–485.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200266006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Janiszewski C, Wyer RS (2014) Content and process priming: a review. J Consum Psychol 24(1):96–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Joachim V, Spieth P, Heidenreich S (2018) Active innovation resistance: an empirical study on functional and psychological barriers to innovation adoption in different contexts. Ind Mark Manag 71:95–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.12.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  162. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Kaplan S (2008) Framing contests: strategy making under uncertainty. Organ Sci 19(5):729–752.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad Manag J 45(6):1183–1194.  https://doi.org/10.5465/3069433 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Kaufman SB, Kaufman JC (2007) Ten years to expertise, many more to greatness: an investigation of modern writers. J Creat Behav 41(2):114–124.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01284.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Keefe A (2016) These women rock indigenous clothes to reclaim their history. https://www.nationalgeographic.com. Accessed 1 Jun 2018
  167. Keupp MM, Gassmann O (2013) Resource constraints as triggers of radical innovation: longitudinal evidence from the manufacturing sector. Res Policy 42(8):1457–1468.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Keupp MM, Palmié M, Gassmann O (2012) The strategic management of innovation: a systematic review and paths for future research. Int J Manag Rev 14(4):367–390.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00321.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. King AA, Baatartogtokh B (2015) How useful is the theory of disruptive innovation? MIT Sloan Manag Rev 57(1):77–90Google Scholar
  170. Kirton M (1976) Adaptors and innovators: a description and measure. J Appl Psychol 61(5):622–629.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.61.5.622 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Kleijnen M, Lee N, Wetzels M (2009) An exploration of consumer resistance to innovation and its antecedents. J Econ Psychol 30(3):344–357.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Knight E, Harvey W (2015) Managing exploration and exploitation paradoxes in creative organisations. Manag Decis 53(4):809–827.  https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2014-0124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Knudson D (2007) Introduction to biomechanics of human movement. In: Fundamentals of biomechanics, 2nd edn. Springer, Boston, MA, pp 3–22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-49312-1_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. Kolers PA, Roediger HL (1984) Procedures of mind. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 23(4):425–449.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90282-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Kray LJ, Galinsky AD (2003) The debiasing effect of counterfactual mind-sets: increasing the search for disconfirmatory information in group decisions. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 91(1):69–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00534-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Kray LJ, Galinsky AD, Wong EM (2006) Thinking within the box: the relational processing style elicited by counterfactual mind-sets. J Pers Soc Psychol 91(1):33–48.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.33 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Kristof AL (1996) Person-organization fit: an integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Pers Psychol 49(1):1–49.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Kristof-Brown AL, Guay RP (2011) Person–environment fit. In: Zedeck S (ed) APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, vol 3. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 3–50.  https://doi.org/10.1037/12171-001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. Kristof-Brown AL, Zimmerman RD, Johnson EC (2005) Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: a meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Pers Psychol 58(2):281–342.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Kukla A (2013) Observation. In: Curd M, Psillos S (eds) The Routledge companion to philosophy of science, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  181. Labrecque JS, Wood W, Neal DT, Harrington N (2017) Habit slips: when consumers unintentionally resist new products. J Acad Mark Sci 45(1):119–133.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-016-0482-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Larkin JH, Simon HA (1987) Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cogn Sci 11(1):65–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(87)80026-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Larkin JH, McDermott J, Simon DP, Simon HA (1980) Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science 208(4450):1335–1342.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.208.4450.1335 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Lawton T, McGuire S, Rajwani T (2013) Corporate political activity: a literature review and research agenda. Int J Manag Rev 15(1):86–105.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00337.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. Lepak DP, Smith KG, Taylor MS (2007) Value creation and value capture: a multilevel perspective. Acad Manag Rev 32(1):180–194.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23464011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Leung AKY, Maddux WW, Galinsky AD, Chiu CY (2008) Multicultural experience enhances creativity: the when and how. Am Psychol 63(3):169–181.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. Levav J, Reinholtz N, Lin C (2012) The effect of ordering decisions by choice-set size on consumer search. J Consum Res 39(3):585–599.  https://doi.org/10.1086/664498 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strateg Manag J 14(S2):95–112.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. Lewandowsky S, Ecker UKH, Seifert CM, Schwarz N, Cook J (2012) Misinformation and its correction: continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychol Sci Public Interest 13(3):106–131.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. Lewandowsky S, Cook J, Oberauer K, Brophy S, Lloyd EA, Marriott M (2015) Recurrent fury: conspiratorial discourse in the blogosphere triggered by research on the role of conspiracist ideation in climate denial. J Soc Polit Psychol 3(1):142–178.  https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v3i1.443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. Lewin K (1935) A dynamic theory of personality: selected papers (trans: Adams DK, Zener KE). McGraw-Hill, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  192. Lilien GL (2011) Bridging the academic-practitioner divide in marketing decision models. J Mark 75(4):196–210.  https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.196 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Lubart TI (2001) Models of the creative process: past, present and future. Creat Res J 13(3-4):295–308.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_07 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. Luchins AS (1942) Mechanization in problem solving: the effect of Einstellung. Psychol Monogr 54(6):i-95.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093502 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. Luchins AS, Luchins EH (1959) Rigidity of behavior: a variational approach to the effect of einstellung. University of Oregon Books, Eugene, ORGoogle Scholar
  196. Ma J, Roese NJ (2014) The maximizing mind-set. J Consum Res 41(1):71–92.  https://doi.org/10.1086/674977 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. Madjar N, Oldham GR, Pratt MG (2002) There’s no place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees’ creative performance. Acad Manag J 45(4):757–767.  https://doi.org/10.5465/3069309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. Madsen PM, Desai V (2010) Failing to learn? The effects of failure and success on organizational learning in the global orbital launch vehicle industry. Acad Manag J 53(3):451–476.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51467631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. Mainemelis C (2010) Stealing fire: creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas. Acad Manag Rev 35(4):558–578.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.4.zok558 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. March JG (1981) Footnotes to organizational change. Adm Sci Q 26(4):563–577.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2392340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations. Wiley, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  202. Markman GD, Baron RA (2003) Person-entrepreneurship fit: why some people are more successful as entrepreneurs than others. Hum Resour Manag Rev 13(2):281–301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(03)00018-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  203. Maule T (1960) The shotput explosion. Sports Illustrated, April 25, https://www.si.com
  204. McCrae RR (1987) Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. J Pers Soc Psychol 52(6):1258–1265.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr (1997) Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In: Hogan R, Johnson J, Briggs S (eds) Handbook of personality psychology. Academic, New York, NY, pp 825–847.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012134645-4/50032-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. McGrath RG (1999) Falling forward: real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. Acad Manag Rev 24(1):13–30.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1580438 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. McGrath RG (2011) Failing by design. Harv Bus Rev 89(4):76–83. 137Google Scholar
  208. McIntyre MM, Graziano WG (2016) Seeing people, seeing things: individual differences in selective attention. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 42(9):1258–1271.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216653937 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. McNamee LG (2017) Frame/framing. The international encyclopedia of organizational communication. Wiley, New York, NY.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118955567.wbieoc084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. Melero E, Palomeras N (2015) The renaissance man is not dead! The role of generalists in teams of inventors. Res Policy 44(1):154–167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. Merced WD (2017) How can we hear the stars? [video]. https://www.npr.org. Accessed 1 Jun 2018
  212. Merton RK, Barber E (2004) The travels and adventures of serendipity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  213. Miron E, Erez M, Naveh E (2004) Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? J Organ Behav 25(2):175–199.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  214. Miron-Spektor E, Erez M, Naveh E (2011) The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: reconciling the innovation paradox. Acad Manag J 54(4):740–760.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.64870100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  215. Muchinsky PM, Monahan CJ (1987) What is person-environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary models of fit. J Vocat Behav 31(3):268–277.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(87)90043-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  216. Mueller JS, Melwani S, Goncalo JA (2012) The bias against creativity: why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psychol Sci 23(1):13–17.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611421018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  217. Mueller JS, Melwani S, Loewenstein J, Deal JJ (2018) Reframing the decision-makers’ dilemma: towards a social context model of creative idea recognition. Acad Manag J 61(1):94–110.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0887 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. Mumford MD, Gustafson SB (1988) Creativity syndrome: integration, application, and innovation. Psychol Bull 103(1):27–43.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.1.27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. Mumford MD, Medeiros KE, Partlow PJ (2012) Creative thinking: processes, strategies, and knowledge. J Creat Behav 46(1):30–47.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  220. Murayama K, Nirei M, Shimizu H (2015) Management of science, serendipity, and research performance: evidence from a survey of scientists in Japan and the U.S. Res Policy 44(4):862–873.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  221. Nedo J (2016) Der V-Stil im Skispringen: Jan Boklöv: Per Zufall zum Visionär [The v-style in ski jumping: Jan Boklöv: Visionary by chance]. Tagesspiegel, December 28, https://www.tagesspiegel.de
  222. Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  223. Newell AF, Gregor P (1999) Extra-ordinary human-machine interaction: What can be learned from people with disabilities? Cogn Tech Work 1(2):78–85.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s101110050034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  224. Nietzsche F (1974 [1882]) The gay science with a prelude of rhymes and an appendix of songs (trans: Kaufmann W). Vintage, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  225. O’Donnell AM, Dansereau DF, Hall RH (2002) Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educ Psychol Rev 14(1):71–86.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013132527007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML (2008) Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Res Organ Behav 28:185–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  227. O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML (2013) Organizational ambidexterity: past, present, and future. Acad Manag Perspect 27(4):324–338.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  228. O’Reilly CA, Chatman J, Caldwell DF (1991) People and organizational culture: a profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Acad Manag J 34(3):487–516.  https://doi.org/10.5465/256404 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  229. Oreg S (2003) Resistance to change: developing an individual differences measure. J Appl Psychol 88(4):680–693.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.680 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  230. Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2010) Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Wiley, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  231. Paulus P (2000) Groups, teams, and creativity: the creative potential of idea-generating groups. Appl Psychol 49(2):237–262.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  232. Perra DB, Sidhu JS, Volberda HW (2017) How do established firms produce breakthrough innovations? Managerial identity-dissemination discourse and the creation of novel product-market solutions. J Prod Innov Manag 34(4):509–525.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  233. Pettitt C (2015) Anthropology: one-man multidisciplinarian. Nature 525(7569):319–320.  https://doi.org/10.1038/525319a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  234. Poolton J, Ismail H (2000) New developments in innovation. J Manag Psychol 15(8):795–811.  https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940010379350 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  235. Potočnik K, Anderson N (2016) A constructively critical review of change and innovation-related concepts: towards conceptual and operational clarity. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 25(4):481–494.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1176022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  236. Raisch S, Birkinshaw J (2008) Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J Manag 34(3):375–409.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  237. Raisch S, Birkinshaw J, Probst G, Tushman ML (2009) Organizational ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organ Sci 20(4):685–695.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  238. Ram S, Sheth JN (1989) Consumer resistance to innovations: the marketing problem and its solutions. J Consum Mark 6(2):5–14.  https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002542 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  239. Ramos J, Anderson N, Peiró JM, Zijlstra F (2016) Studying innovation in organizations: a dialectic perspective-introduction to the special issue. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 25(4):477–480.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1192364 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  240. Ritter SM, Dijksterhuis A (2014) Creativity – the unconscious foundations of the incubation period. Front Hum Neurosci 8(215):1–10.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  241. Ritter SM, Rietzschel EF (2017) Lay theories of creativity. In: Zedelius CM, BCN M, Schooler JW (eds) The science of lay theories: how beliefs shape our cognition, behavior, and health. Springer, New York, NY, pp 95–126.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57306-9_5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  242. Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  243. Rose PM (1997) Creativity, freedom and the promise of knowledge: an historical overview. Doctoral dissertation, Queen’s University Canada, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global DatabaseGoogle Scholar
  244. Rosing K, Frese M, Bausch A (2011) Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: ambidextrous leadership. Leadersh Q 22(5):956–974.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  245. Ruch W, Proyer René T (2008) The fear of being laughed at: individual and group differences in gelotophobia. Humor Int J Humor Res 21(1):47–67.  https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2008.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  246. Rynes S, Gerhart B (1990) Interviewer assessments of applicant “fit”: an exploratory investigation. Pers Psychol 43(1):13–35.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb02004.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  247. Samuel A, Albert D, Moshfique U, Ofori DJ (2016) Entrepreneurs’ optimism, cognitive style and persistence. Int J Entrep Behav Res 22(1):84–108.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-07-2015-0158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  248. Sapp DD (1992) The point of creative frustration and the creative process: a new look at an old model. J Creat Behav 26(1):21–28.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1992.tb01153.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  249. Schein EH (1985) Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  250. Scheufele DA (1999) Framing as a theory of media effects. J Commun 49(1):103–122.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  251. Schneider B, Goldstein HW, Smith DB (1995) The ASA framework: an update. Pers Psychol 48(4):747–773.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01780.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  252. Schoemaker PJH, Russo JE (2001) Managing frames to make better decisions. In: Hoch SJ, Kunreuther HC (eds) Wharton on decision making. Wiley, New York, NY, pp 131–155Google Scholar
  253. Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner. Basic Books, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  254. Schooler JW (2002) Verbalization produces a transfer inappropriate processing shift. Appl Cogn Psychol 16(8):989–997.  https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.930 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  255. Schultz TW (1961) Investment in human capital. Am Econ Rev 51(1):1–17Google Scholar
  256. Schumpeter JA (1934) The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  257. Schwarz N, Sanna LJ, Skurnik I, Yoon C (2007) Metacognitive experiences and the intricacies of setting people straight: implications for debiasing and public information campaigns. In: Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 39. Academic, New York, NY, pp 127–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39003-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  258. Shalley CE, Perry-Smith JE (2001) Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: the role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 84(1):1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2918 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  259. Shalley CE, Zhou J (2008) Organizational creativity research: a historical overview. In: Shalley CE, Zhou J (eds) Handbook of organizational creativity. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 3–31Google Scholar
  260. Shalley CE, Zhou J, Oldham GR (2004) The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: where should we go from here? J Manag 30(6):933–958.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  261. Shanteau J (1992a) Competence in experts: the role of task characteristics. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 53(2):252–266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(92)90064-E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  262. Shanteau J (1992b) How much information does an expert use? Is it relevant? Acta Psychol 81(1):75–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(92)90012-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  263. Sheth JN (1981) Psychology of innovation resistance: the less developed concept (ldc) in diffusion research. In: Sheth JN (ed) Research in marketing. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp 273–282Google Scholar
  264. Simonton DK (2003) Expertise, competence, and creative ability: the perplexing complexities. In: Sternberg RJ, Grigorenko EL (eds) The psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 213–238.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615801.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  265. Sitkin SB (1992) Learning through failure: the strategy of small losses. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL (eds) Research in organizational behavior, vol 14. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp 231–266Google Scholar
  266. Sluiter I (2017) Anchoring innovation: a classical research agenda. Eur Rev 25(1):20–38.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798716000442 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  267. Smith ER (1990) Content and process specificity in the effects of prior experiences. In: Srull TK, Wyer RS (eds) Advances in social cognition, vol 3. Lawrence Erlbaum. Hilldale, NJ, pp 1–59Google Scholar
  268. Smith DK, Paradice DB, Smith SM (2000) Prepare your mind for creativity. Commun ACM 43(7):110–116.  https://doi.org/10.1145/341852.341870 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  269. Smolucha F (1992) A reconstruction of Vygotsky’s theory of creativity. Creat Res J 5(1):49–67.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419209534422 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  270. Snow DA, Benford RD (1988) Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. Int Soc Mov Res 1(1):197–217Google Scholar
  271. Spender JC (1996) Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J 17(S2):45–62.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  272. Stahl GK, Maznevski ML, Voigt A, Jonsen K (2010) Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: a meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups. J Int Bus Stud 41(4):690–709.  https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.85 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  273. Staw BM (1995) Why no one really wants creativity. In: Ford CM, Gioia DA (eds) Creative action in organizations: ivory tower visions and real world voices. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 161–166.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243535.n21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  274. Stebbins RA (2013) Serendipity. In: Kaldis B (ed) Encyclopedia of philosophy and the social sciences, vol 1. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 863–863.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452276052.n327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  275. Stompff G, Smulders F, Henze L (2016) Surprises are the benefits: reframing in multidisciplinary design teams. Des Stud 47:187–214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  276. Talke K, Heidenreich S (2014) How to overcome pro-change bias: incorporating passive and active innovation resistance in innovation decision models. J Prod Innov Manag 31(5):894–907.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  277. Täuscher K, Abdelkafi N (2017) Visual tools for business model innovation: recommendations from a cognitive perspective. Creat Innov Manag 26(2):160–174.  https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  278. Tidd J (2006) A review of innovation models. Discussion Paper 1. Imperial College London, Tanaka Business School, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu
  279. Tierney P, Farmer SM, Graen GB (1999) An examination of leadership and employee creativity: the relevance of traits and relationships. Pers Psychol 52(3):591–620.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00173.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  280. Titus PA (2018) Exploring creative marketing thought: divergent ideation processes and outcomes. Psychol Mark 35(3):237–248.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  281. Tomoki S (2007) A contingency perspective of the importance of PI fit and PO fit in employee selection. J Manag Psychol 22(2):118–131.  https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710726384 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  282. Tushman ML, O’Reilly CA (1996) Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. Calif Manag Rev 38(4):8–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  283. Tversky B (2011) Visualizing thought. Top Cogn Sci 3(3):499–535.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01113.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  284. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453–458.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  285. Utterback JM (1994) Mastering the dynamics of innovation: How companies can seize opportunities in the face of technological change. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  286. Van Andel P (1992) Serendipity: “expect also the unexpected”. Creat Innov Manag 1(1):20–32.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.1992.tb00018.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  287. Van de Ven AH (1986) Central problems in the management of innovation. Manag Sci 32(5):590–607.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  288. VanGundy AB (2007) Getting to innovation: how asking the right questions generates the great ideas your company needs. AMACOM, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  289. Vattam SS, Helms ME, Goel AK (2009) Nature of creative analogies in biologically inspired innovative design. Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on creativity and cognition, pp 255–264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1640233.1640273
  290. Verhaeghen P, Trani AN, Aikman SN (2017) On being found: how habitual patterns of thought influence creative interest, behavior, and ability. Creat Res J 29(1):1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1263504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  291. Vishwanath A (2009) From belief-importance to intention: the impact of framing on technology adoption. Commun Monogr 76(2):177–206.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750902828438 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  292. Vogel S (1999) Unnatural acts. The Sciences 39(4):10–12.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2326-1951.1999.tb03697.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  293. Wallas G (1926) The art of thought. Harcourt, Brace and Company, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  294. Walsh JP, Ungson GR (1991) Organizational memory. Acad Manag Rev 16(1):57–91.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278992 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  295. Wang B, Miao Y, Zhao H, Jin J, Chen Y (2016) A biclustering-based method for market segmentation using customer pain points. Eng Appl Artif Intell 47:101–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2015.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  296. Waters M (2016) The public shaming of England’s first umbrella user. https://www.atlasobscura.com. Accessed 24 Jun 2018
  297. Watzlawick P, Weakland JH, Fisch R (1974) Change: principles of problem formation and problem resolution. Norton, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  298. Wedell-Wedellsborg T (2017) Are you solving the right problems? Harv Bus Rev 95(1):76–83Google Scholar
  299. Weick KE (1979) The social psychology of organizing. 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
  300. Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  301. Weick KE (1998) Introductory essay – improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organ Sci 9(5):543–555.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.5.543 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  302. Weisenfeld U (2009) Serendipity as a mechanism of change and its potential for explaining change processes. Manag Rev 20(2):138–148.  https://doi.org/10.1688/1861-9908_mrev_2009_02_Weisenfeld CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  303. Weiss M, Hoegl M, Gibbert M (2011) Making virtue of necessity: the role of team climate for innovation in resource-constrained innovation projects. J Prod Innov Manag 28(S1):196–207.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00870.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  304. West MA (1990) The social psychology of innovation in groups. In: West MA, Farr J (eds) Innovation and creativity at work: psychological and organizational strategies. Wiley, Oxford, pp 309–333Google Scholar
  305. West MA, Anderson NR (1996) Innovation in top management teams. J Appl Psychol 81(6):680–693.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.680 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  306. White M (2000) Leonardo da Vinci: the first scientist. Little, Brown and Company, LondonGoogle Scholar
  307. Widmann A, Messmann G, Mulder RH (2016) The impact of team learning behaviors on team innovative work behavior: a systematic review. Hum Resour Dev Rev 15(4):429–458.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316673713 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  308. Wood W, Rünger D (2016) Psychology of habit. Annu Rev Psychol 67(1):289–314.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033417 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  309. Wood W, Tam L, Witt MG (2005) Changing circumstances, disrupting habits. J Pers Soc Psychol 88(6):918–933.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.918 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  310. Woodman RW, Sawyer JE, Griffin RW (1993) Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad Manag Rev 18(2):293–321.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1993.3997517 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  311. Woodruff RB (1997) Customer value: the next source for competitive advantage. J Acad Mark Sci 25(2):139.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02894350 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  312. Wrona T, Sinzig C (2018) Nonmarket strategy research: systematic literature review and future directions. J Bus Econ 88(2):253–317.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-017-0875-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  313. Wyer RS, Xu AJ (2010) The role of behavioral mind-sets in goal-directed activity: conceptual underpinnings and empirical evidence. J Consum Psychol 20(2):107–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  314. Xu AJ, Wyer RS (2007) The effect of mind-sets on consumer decision strategies. J Consum Res 34(4):556–566.  https://doi.org/10.1086/519293 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  315. Xu AJ, Wyer RS (2012) The role of bolstering and counterarguing mind-sets in persuasion. J Consum Res 38(5):920–932.  https://doi.org/10.1086/661112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  316. Yaqub O (2018) Serendipity: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Res Policy 47(1):169–179.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  317. Yuan F, Woodman RW (2010) Innovative behavior in the workplace: the role of performance and image outcome expectations. Acad Manag J 53(2):323–342.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.49388995 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  318. Zeithaml VA (1988) Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J Mark 52(3):2–22.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1251446 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  319. Zhou J, Hoever IJ (2014) Research on workplace creativity: a review and redirection. Annu Rev Organ Psych Organ Behav 1(1):333–359.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  320. Zhou J, Shalley CE (2003) Research on employee creativity: a critical review and directions for future research. In: Martocchio J (ed) Research in personnel and human resources management, vol 22. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 165–217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(03)22004-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  321. Zhou J, Shalley CE (2011) Deepening our understanding of creativity in the workplace: a review of different approaches to creativity research. In: Zedeck S (ed) APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, vol 1. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 275–302.  https://doi.org/10.1037/12169-009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann-Kathrin Veenendaal
    • 1
  1. 1.Steinbeis University BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations