Advertisement

Action Research

  • Greg Hearn
  • Dan Swan
  • Kathryn Geels
Chapter

Abstract

As media systems continue to evolve rapidly, provoking cultural and institutional change, the relevance of action research to media research has grown. Action research is premised on enacting and observing change. Action research formulates practical interventions which test conceptual or policy hypotheses, then evaluates these interventions to draw conclusions about the hypotheses. Action research has been used in media research for purposes of advocacy, activism or local empowerment, as well as educational, cultural or pragmatic commercial outcomes. Because of the primacy of action, this research approach is local in terms of framing, and participant-driven, in terms of its design. Media policy however, is normally a national or at least broader jurisdictional problem. Therefore, in this chapter, we provide two cases which particularly emphasize how to design and execute action research so that it links to national or broader policy agendas. The rationale for Case 1 was an observation in Australia’s national data about growth in creative digital media services to other sectors of the economy. The action research that followed was an initiative of an Australian Government department concerned with integrating these interactive digital media into more traditional industry sectors, to enhance their innovative capacity. Companies that took part were primarily concerned with enhancing business outcomes such as improving their innovative capacities and in some cases pursuing specific start-up ventures for commercial gain. The project facilitated collaboration between digital media companies and companies in the mining, manufacturing and education sectors. The second case is an initiative of the UK Foundation Nesta (National Endowment for Science Technology and the Arts) to encourage hyperlocal media within a national policy agenda responding to rapid change in the media sector. The focus of action was on helping these media publishers analyze their audience and content, increasing their digital skills and developing nationally relevant commercial and social value propositions. The steps in an action research cycle are exemplified and explained for each case.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Australian and Victorian Governments for original funding of Case 1 and Nesta for funding of Case 2 reported in this chapter. Case 2 is based on excerpts from nesta.org.uk in reports (Geels, 2016, 2017) and ancillary material, which the study “Action research in audience analytics” which was part of the project “Destination Local”. These excerpts are used with permission of Nesta.

References

  1. Geels, K. (2016, April 5). Action research in audience analytics—Project completion and evaluation. Retrieved from https://www.nesta.org.uk/blog/action-research-audience-analytics-project-completion-and-evaluation.
  2. Geels, K. (2017, January 13). Action research in audience analytics: 12-month evaluation and final resources for hyperlocal publishers. Retrieved from https://www.nesta.org.uk/blog/action-research-in-audience-analytics-12-month-evaluation-and-final-resources-for-hyperlocal-publishers.
  3. Hearn, G., Bridgstock, R., Goldsmith, B., & Rodgers, J. (Eds.). (2014). Media work beyond the media and communication industries: Innovation education and employment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  4. Hearn, G., Tacchi, J., Foth, M., & Lennie, J. (2009). Action research and new media: Concepts, methods and cases. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hearn, G. N., & Foth, M. (2005). Action research in the design of new media and ICT systems. In K. Kwansah-Aidoo (Eds.), Topical issues in communications and media research (pp. 79–94). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  6. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R., Deakin University. School of Education, & Deakin University. Open Campus Program. (1988). The action research reader (3rd, substantially revised ed.). Waurn Ponds, VIC: Deakin University.Google Scholar
  7. Lennie, J. (2006). Increasing the rigour and trustworthiness of participatory evaluations: Learnings from the field. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 6(1), 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mayhew, F. (2017, July). 15 ultra local and independent publishers qualify to bid for share of 150 BBC local democracy reporters. Press Gazette. Retrieved from http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/first-news-outlets-to-qualify-for-bbc-local-democracy-reporters-pool-are-largely-independent-hyperlocal-websites/.
  9. Meese, E. (2017). Our Manifesto. Centre for Community Journalism. Retrieved from https://www.communityjournalism.co.uk/icnn/our-manifesto/.
  10. Swan, D. (2015). Creative interoperability: A new concept to guide, understand and evaluate innovation by cross-sector collaboration. Ph.D. by Publication, Queensland University of Technology.Google Scholar
  11. Swan, D., & Hearn, G. (2016). Semantic mapping of cognitively diverse start-up teams: Dynamic creative interoperability. In Proceedings of the XXVII ISPIM Innovation Conference 2016 (pp. 1–15), ISPIM, Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar
  12. Swan, D., & Hearn, G. N. (2014). Creative digital services in education mining and manufacturing: Pursuing innovation through interoperability. In G. N. Hearn, R. S. Bridgstock, B. Goldsmith, & J. Rodgers (Eds.), Creative work beyond the creative industries: Innovation, employment and education (pp. 1–24). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  13. Tacchi, J., Slater, D., & Hearn, G. (2003). Ethnographic action research. New Delhi: UNESCO New Delhi.Google Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Anderson, C. R., & McLachlan, S. M. (2016). Transformative research as knowledge mobilization: Transmedia, bridges, and layers. Action Research, 14(3), 295–317.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750315616684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cumming, T. M., Strnadová, I., & Singh, S. (2014). iPads as instructional tools to enhance learning opportunities for students with developmental disabilities: An action research project. Action Research, 12(2), 151–176.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750314525480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Eady, S., Drew, V., & Smith, A. (2015). Doing action research in organizations: Using communicative spaces to facilitate (transformative) professional learning. Action Research, 13(2), 105–122.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750314549078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Foth, M., & Brynskov, M. (2016). Participatory action research for civic engagement. Civic media: Technology, design, practice (pp. 563–580). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Noske-Turner, J., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Grounding innovation in Pacific media and communication for development projects (Special issue). Information Technologies & International Development, 12(4), 59–69.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Greg Hearn
    • 1
  • Dan Swan
    • 2
  • Kathryn Geels
    • 3
  1. 1.QUTBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.RealarByron BayAustralia
  3. 3.European Journalism CentreBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations