Advertisement

Assessing Policy III: Regulatory Impact Assessment

  • Markus Oermann
  • Wolfgang Schulz
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we expound the concept of regulatory impact assessment (RIA) with a special focus on media policies and regulations. First, we shed light on what RIA is in general and on which theoretical foundations it has been developed and can be analyzed itself. Why has RIA become a common practice? While answering this question we show up the tensions between the perspectives of rational choice based Principal–Agent Theory and theories of democratic governance on RIA. Second, we give an overview on how the processes of RIA are conceptualized and assess recent developments in empirical and conceptual literature on RIA methods. We highlight the main challenges when assessing regulations regarding their impacts, namely the definition of goals and objectives of different policy options (conceptualization), the identification of the impact dimensions and relations to look at (modeling) and the methods to do so (operationalization), the deeper analysis of this relations and the valuation of the regulation based on that analysis (implementation). In addition to that, we critically assess the impact of RIA itself on the outcome of regulative processes. Third, we introduce and compare the procedures and recommendations for RIA of the EU and the OECD. Then, we focus on media regulation and present two cases in which RIA has been applied on proposals of the EU Commission for directives addressing audiovisual media services. Based on that, we finally propose some suggestions for researchers involved with RIA and on improving RIA in general when it comes to media regulation.

References

  1. Baldwin, R. (2010). Better regulation: The search and the struggle. In R. Baldwin, M. Cave, & M. Lodge (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of regulation (pp. 259–279). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Coleman, Jules L. (1980). Efficiency, utility, and wealth maximization. Hofstra Law Review, 8, 509–551.Google Scholar
  3. Döhler, M., & Wegrich, K. (2010). Regulierung als Konzept und Instrument moderner Staatstätigkeit. Der moderne Staat: Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, 3(1): 31–52.Google Scholar
  4. European Commission. (2009). Annexes to impact assessment guidelines. http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/impact/commission_guidelines/docs/ia_guidelines_annexes_en.pdf.
  5. European Commission. (2015a). Better regulation toolbox. http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/guidelines/docs/br_toolbox_en.pdf.
  6. European Commission. (2015b). Contributions and preliminary trends of the public consultation on audiovisual media services (AVMSD). https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/contributions-and-preliminary-trends-public-consultation-audiovisual-media-services-avmsd.
  7. Harrington, W., Morgenstern, R., & Nelson, P. (2000). On the accuracy of regulatory cost estimates. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(2), 297–322.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(200021)19:2%3c297:AID-PAM7%3e3.0.CO;2-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Morgenstern, R. D., Pizer, W. A., & Shih, J.-S. (2001). The cost of environmental protection. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(4), 732–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). The costs of tragedy: Some moral limits of cost-benefit analysis. The Journal of Legal Studies, 29(S2), 1005–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. OECD. (1997). Regulatory impact analysis—Best practices in OECD countries. http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/35258828.pdf.
  11. OECD. (2008a). Building an institutional framework for regulatory impact analysis (RIA): Guidance for policy makers. http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/40984990.pdf.
  12. OECD. (2008b). Introductory handbook for undertaking regulatory impact analysis. http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/44789472.pdf.
  13. Posner, E. A., & Sunstein, C. R. (2017). Moral commitments in cost-benefit analysis (University of Chicago, Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No. 802; University of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 620). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2930450.
  14. Radaelli, C., & De Francesco, F. (2010). Regulatory impact assessment. In R. Baldwin, M. Cave, & M. Lodge (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of regulation (pp. 279–301). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Renda, A. (2011). Law and economics in the RIA world. SSRN Electronic Journal.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1291032.
  16. Robinson, R. (1993a). Costs and cost-minimisation analysis. British Medical Journal, 1993(307), 726–728.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.307.6906.726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Robinson, R. (1993b). Cost-effectiveness analysis. British Medical Journal, 1993(307), 793–795.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.307.6907.793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Robinson, R. (1993c). Cost-utility analysis. British Medical Journal, 1993(307), 859–862.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.307.6908.859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schulz, W. (2009). Alles verändert Gesetze, Gesetze verändern nichts? - Zur Evaluation der Wirkung komplexer gesetzlicher Steuerungsprogramme. Die Öffentliche Verwaltung, 62(24), 1113–1121.Google Scholar
  20. Schulz, W., & Held, T. (2006). Study on co-regulation measures in the media sector. Study for the European Commission, Directorate Information Society and Media. Unit 1A Audiovisual and Media Policies. https://www.hans-bredow-institut.de/webfm_send/330.
  21. Walker, S. (2014). Human rights impact assessments: Emerging practice and challenges. In E. Riedel, G. Giacca, & C. Golay (Eds.), Economic, social, and cultural rights in international law: Contemporary issues and challenges (pp. 391–416). Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wegrich, K. (2011). Regulatory impact assessment: Ambition, design and politics. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), Handbook on the politics of regulation (pp. 397–410). Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Adelle, C., & Weiland, S. (2017). Formal policy appraisal techniques and policy formulation. In M. HowletH & I. Mukherjee (Eds.), Handbook of policy formulation (pp. 147–160). Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allio, L. (2010). Regulatory impact analysis (RIA) in OECD countries. In S. Hensel, K. Bizer, M. Führ, & J. Lange (Eds.), Gesetzesfolgenabschätzung in der Anwendung: Perspektiven und Entwicklungstendenzen (pp. 211–224). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  3. Meuwese, A. C. M., & Senden, L. (2009). European impact assessment and the choice of alternative regulatory instruments. In J. Verschuuren (Ed.), The impact of legislation: A critical analysis of ex ante evaluation (pp. 137–174). Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Radaelli, C. M. (2005). Diffusion without convergence: How political context shapes the adoption of regulatory impact assessment. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 924–943.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500161621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Radaelli, C. M. (2009). Measuring policy learning: Regulatory impact assessment in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(8), 1145–1164.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760903332647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markus Oermann
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Schulz
    • 2
  1. 1.Office of the Federal PresidentBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Leibniz-Institut für Medienforschung │ Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI)HamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations