Assessing Policy I: Stakeholder Analysis

  • Terry Flew
  • Tania Lim


Stakeholder analysis approaches policy-making as involving the engagement of organized and competing interests, and reconciling these competing interests toward shared goals through dialogue and deliberation. The role of policy-makers in this framework is to act as facilitators, who bring their own expertise to the deliberations, and can steer these processes toward outcomes that can achieve stakeholder consensus. This chapter identifies contexts in which stakeholder approaches are likely to be adopted, and the importance of voice in such processes, particularly for non-elite interests. It also considers the future of stakeholder analysis in media policy, given the dramatic changes associated with the digital transformation of the media industries.


  1. AIMS (Advisory Council on Culture and the Arts). (2008, December). Engaging new media/challenging old assumptions: A report of the advisory council on the impact of new media on society. Singapore: AIMS. Google Scholar
  2. Ang, P. H., & Haristya, S. (2015). Multistakeholderism and the democratic deficit. In W. Drake (Ed.), The working group on Internet governance: 10th anniversary reflections (pp. 123–134). Quezon City: Association for Progressive Communications.Google Scholar
  3. Aufderheide, P., & Davis, D. (2017). Contributors and arguments in australian policy debates on fair use and copyright: The missing discussion of the creative process. International Journal of Communication, 11[online], 522–545. Available at: Accessed 19 June 2017.
  4. Australian Law Reform Commission. (2013, November). Copyright and the digital economy (Final Report 122). Sydney: ALRC.Google Scholar
  5. Carpentier, N. (2016). Beyond the ladder of participation: An analytical toolkit for the critical analysis of participatory media processes. Javnost—The Public, 23(1), 70–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coase, R. (1966). The economics of broadcasting and government policy. American Economic Review, 56(1/2), 440–447.Google Scholar
  7. Couldry, N. (2010). Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Dahl, R. (1982). Dilemmas of pluralist democracy: Autonomy vs. control. New Haven, CT: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dryzek, J. S., & Dunleavy, P. (2009). Theories of the democratic state. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans, P. (2014). The developmental state: Divergent responses to modern economic theory and the twenty-first century economy. In M. Williams (Ed.), The end of the developmental state? (pp. 220–239). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  12. Freiberg, A. (2010). The tools of regulation. Sydney: Federation Press.Google Scholar
  13. Friedman, A., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Galbraith, J. K. (1973). Economics and the public purpose. Harmonsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  15. Giddens, A. (2000). The third way and its critics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  16. Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hutton, W. (1997). The state we’re in. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  18. Lee, T. (2010). The media, cultural control and government in Singapore. Oxford and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lindblom, C. (1977). Politics and markets: The world’s political-economic systems. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  20. Mansell, S. (2013). Capitalism, corporations and the social contract: A critique of stakeholder theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MCI (Ministry of Communications and Information). (2013, June 18). What is the licensing framework for online news sites all about? Accessed 28 May 2017.
  22. Oman, C., & Arndt, C. (2010). Measuring governance (OECD Policy Brief No. 39). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  23. Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Productivity Commission. (2016). Intellectual Property Arrangements (Inquiry Report No. 78). Canberra: AGPS.Google Scholar
  25. Srnicek, N. (2016). Platform capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  26. Stinebrickner, B. (2015). Robert A. Dahl and the essentials of modern political analysis: Politics, influence, power, and polyarchy. Journal of Political Power, 8(2), 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tacchi, J. (2012). Open content creation: The issues of voice and the challenges of listening. New Media & Society, 14(4), 652–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tilbury, M. (2005). Why law reform commissions? A deconstruction and stakeholder analysis from an Australian perspective. Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, 23, 313–341.Google Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Couldry, N. (2010). Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. (London: Sage) draws out the significance of engagement of non-elite interests in deliberative policy processes, and points to the limitations of contemporary media policy, and public policy more broadly, in this regard.Google Scholar
  2. Dryzek, J. S., & Dunleavy, P. (2009). Theories of the democratic state (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan) situates both pluralist and deliberative approaches to public policy alongside the major competing frameworks, such as class and elite theories, and political economy approaches.Google Scholar
  3. Mansell, S. (2013). Capitalism, corporations and the social contract: A critique of stakeholder theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) provides a comprehensive overview of stakeholder theory and an account of its limitations in a market capitalist economy. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terry Flew
    • 1
  • Tania Lim
    • 2
  1. 1.Creative Industries FacultyQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.School of ArtsMurdoch UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations