Advertisement

Introduction: Media Policy and Media Policy Research

  • Manuel Puppis
  • Hilde Van den Bulck
Chapter

Abstract

This introductory chapter discusses both media policy and the field of media policy research. Focusing on the subject of research first, we deal with media policy, media regulation and media governance, and how they relate to each other. We argue that media policies emanate from and are reflective of more abstract paradigmatic views on the relationship between the state, society and media. Moreover, media policy is not only about the output of policy-making but also about the policy-making process (politics) that takes place within specific institutional structures (polity). In turn, media regulation refers to the specific instruments implemented to achieve specified policy goals and media governance reflects a power shift from governments to new actors and fora. Proceeding to the research field, we follow Lasswell by defining media policy research as encompassing both doing research about media policy and informing media policy-making. We briefly discuss the history of this field of study and the ongoing debate about the relationship between administrative and critical research. The chapter ends by looking at the promise and limitations of the recent trend of evidence-based policy-making and its implication for the analysis of media and communication policy.

References

  1. Ali, C., & Puppis, M. (2018). When the watchdog neither barks nor bites: Communication as a power resource in media policy and regulation. Communication Theory, online first.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtx003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allan, S. (2010a). News culture (3rd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Allan, S. (Ed.). (2010b). The Routledge companion to news and journalism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, J. A. (1975). Public policy-making. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  5. Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2012). Understanding regulation: Theory, strategy, and practice (2nd ed.). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bauer, J. M., Kim, S., Mody, B., & Wildman, S. S. (2005, May 26–30). The role of research in communications policy: Theory and evidence. Paper presented at the 55th Annual Conference of the International Communications Association, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Blakie, P., & Soussan, J. G. (2001). Understanding policy processes. Leeds: University of Leeds.Google Scholar
  8. Bock, D. E., Vellemann, P. F., & De Veaux, R. D. (2015). Stats: Modelling the world (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  9. Braman, S. (2003a). Policy as a research context. In S. Braman (Ed.), Communication researchers and policy making (pp. 35–58). Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Braman, S. (2003b). The long view. In S. Braman (Ed.), Communication researchers and policy-making (pp. 10–31). Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Braman, S. (2004). Where has media policy gone? Defining the field in the twenty-first century. Communication Law and Policy, 9(2), 153–182.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326926clp0902_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Braman, S. (2008). Policy research in an evidence-averse environment. International Journal of Communication, 2, 433–449.Google Scholar
  13. Braunstein, D., Plumb, J., & Warburton, W. (2012). Media and social policy: Towards an evidence-based approach to content regulation. In W. Warburton & D. Braunstein (Eds.), Growing up fast and furious: Reviewing the impacts of violent and sexualized media on children (pp. 197–219). Sydney: Federation Press.Google Scholar
  14. Buckingham, D. (2009). The appliance of science: The role of evidence in the making of regulatory policy on children and food advertising in the UK. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 15(2), 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chernyavskaya, A. (2015). Evidence-based policymaking for provision of children’s rights online. LSE Media Policy Project Blog. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mediapolicyproject/2015/06/24/evidence-based-policymaking-for-provisionof-childrens-rights-online/.
  16. Dahlgren, P. (1995). Television and the public sphere. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. d’Haenens, L., Mansell, R., & Sarikakis, K. (Eds.). (2010). Media governance: New policies for changing media landscape [Special Issue]. Communication, Culture & Critique, 3(2).Google Scholar
  18. Donders, K., & Raats, T. (2012). Analyzing national practices after European state aid control: Are multi-stakeholder negotiations beneficial for public service broadcasting. Media, Culture and Society, 34(2), 162–180.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711430756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Donders, K., Van den Bulck, H., & Raats, T. (2018). The politics of pleasing: A critical analysis of multistakeholderism in public service media policies in Flanders. Media, Culture and Society, online first.Google Scholar
  20. Farr, J., Hacker, J. S., & Kazee, N. (2006). The policy scientist of democracy: The discipline of Harold D. Lasswell. American Political Science Review, 100(4), 579–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freedman, D. (2008). The politics of media policy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  22. Freedman, D. (2010). Media policy silences: The hidden face of communications decision making. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(3), 344–361.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161210368292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Garnham, N. (1992). The media and the public sphere. In C. Cahoun (Ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gibbons, T., & Humphreys, P. (2012). Audiovisual regulation under pressure. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gilardi, F. (2005). The institutional foundations of regulatory capitalism: The diffusion of independent regulatory agencies in western Europe. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598, 84–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ginosar, A. (2013). Media governance: A conceptual framework or merely a buzz word? Communication Theory, 23(4), 356–374.  https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haight, T. R. (1983). The critical researcher’s dilemma. Journal of Communication, 33(3), 226–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36, 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hall, P. A. (1992). The movement from Keynesianism to monetarism: Institutional analysis and British economic policy in the 1970s. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, & F. Longstreth (Eds.), Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis (pp. 90–113). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hansen, A., Cottle, S., Negrine, R., & Newbold, C. (1998). Mass communication research methods. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harms, L. S. (1977). Toward a shared paradigm for communication: An emerging foundation for the new communication policy and communication planning sciences. In S. A. Rahim & J. Middleton (Eds.), Perspectives in communication policy and planning (pp. 77–99). Honolulu: East-West Center.Google Scholar
  32. Howlett, M. (2009). Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: Lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 52(2), 153–175.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2009.00070_1.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hutchinson, D. (1999). Media policy: An introduction. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  34. Jones, C. (1970). An introduction to the study of public policy. Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  35. Jordana, J., & Levi-Faur, D. (Eds.). (2004). The politics of regulation: Institutions and regulatory reform in the age of governance. Cheltenham; Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  36. Just, N., & Puppis, M. (2012). Communication policy research: Looking back, moving forward. In N. Just & M. Puppis (Eds.), Trends in communication policy research: New theories, methods and subjects (pp. 9–29). Bristol; Chicago: Intellect.Google Scholar
  37. Just, N., & Puppis, M. (2018). Moving beyond self-castigation: Let’s reinvigorate communication policy research now! Journal of Communication, 68(2), 327–336.  https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaid, L. L., & Holtz-Bacha, C. (Eds.). (2008). Encyclopedia of political communication. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Karppinen, K., & Moe, H. (2013). A critique of “media governance”. In M. Löblich & S. Pfaff-Rüdiger (Eds.), Communication and media policy in the era of the Internet: Theories and processes (pp. 69–80). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  40. Katz, E., & Katz, R. (2016). Revisiting the origin of the administrative versus critical research debate. Journal of Information Policy, 6, 4–12.  https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.6.2016.0004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kunkel, D., & Farinola, W. J. M. (2001). Underestimating our own weight? The scope and impact of communication research on public policy. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication yearbook, 24 (pp. 411–431). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Künzler, M. (2012). ‘It’s the idea, stupid!’ How ideas challenge broadcasting liberalization. In N. Just & M. Puppis (Eds.), Trends in communication policy research: New theories, methods and subjects (pp. 55–74). Bristol; Chicago: Intellect.Google Scholar
  43. Lasswell, H. D. (1951). The policy orientation. In D. Lerner & H. D. Lasswell (Eds.), The policy sciences: Recent developments in scope and method (pp. 3–15). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Lasswell, H. D. (1956). The decision process. College Park: University of Maryland Press.Google Scholar
  45. Lasswell, H. D. (1970). The emerging conception of the policy sciences. Policy Sciences, 1(1), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Latzer, M. (1998). European mediamatics policies: Coping with convergence and globalization. Telecommunications Policy, 22(6), 457–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1941). Remarks on administrative and critical communication research. Studies in Philosophy and Science, 9, 2–16.Google Scholar
  48. Lijphart, A. (1984). Non-majoritarian democracy: A comparison of federal and consociational theories. Publius, 15(2), 3–15.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3329961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lowi, T. J. (1964). Review: American business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory. World Politics, 16(4), 677–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Marston, G., & Watts, R. (2003). Tampering with the evidence: A critical appraisal of evidence-based policy-making. The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs, 3(3), 143–163.Google Scholar
  51. McChesney, R. W. (2008). The political economy of the media: Enduring issues, emerging dilemmas. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  52. Meier, W. A. (2018). Media governance: More than a buzzword? In L. d’Haenens, H. Sousa, & J. Trappel (Eds.), Comparative media policy, regulation and governance in Europe: Unpacking the policy cycle (pp. 55–71). Bristol; Chicago: Intellect.Google Scholar
  53. Melody, W. H., & Mansell, R. (1983). The debate over critical vs. administrative research: Circularity or challenge. Journal of Communication, 33(3), 103–116.Google Scholar
  54. Mueller, M. (1995). Why communications policy is passing ‘mass communication’ by: Political economy as the missing link. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 12(4), 457–472.Google Scholar
  55. Murdock, G., & Golding P. (2005). Culture, communications and political economy. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (eds.), Mass media and society, 4th ed. (pp. 60–83). London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
  56. Napoli, P. M. (1999). The unique nature of communications regulation: Evidence and implications for communications policy analysis. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43(4), 565–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Napoli, P. M. (2001). Foundations of communications policy: Principles and process in the regulation of electronic media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  58. Napoli, P. M. (2007). Media policy: An overview of the field (McGannon Center Working Paper 19). Bronx, NY: Fordham University.Google Scholar
  59. Napoli, P. M., & Friedland, L. (2016). US communications policy research and the integration of the administrative and critical communication research traditions. Journal of Information Policy, 6, 41–65.  https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.6.2016.0041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Napoli, P. M., & Seaton, M. (2007). Necessary knowledge for communications policy: Information asymmetries and commercial data access and usage in the policymaking process. Federal Communication Law Journal, 59(2), 295–330.Google Scholar
  61. Parsons, W. (2002). From muddling through to muddling up: Evidence based policy making and the modernization of British government. Public Policy and Administration, 17(3), 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Patzelt, W. J. (2003). Einführung in die Politikwissenschaft. Grundriss des Faches und studiumbegleitende Orientierung (5th ed.). Passau: Wissenschaftsverlag Richard Rothe.Google Scholar
  63. Pool, I. d. S. (1974). The rise of communications policy research. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pool, I. d. S. (1983). Technologies of freedom: On free speech in an electronic age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Price, M., Puppis, M., & Verhulst, S. (2013). Media policy and governance. Oxford Bibliographies.  https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756841-0119.
  66. Puppis, M. (2010a). Media governance: A new concept for the analysis of media policy and regulation. Communication, Culture & Critique, 3(2), 134–149.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2010.01063.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Puppis, M. (2010b). Einführung in die Medienpolitik (2nd ed.). Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
  68. Puppis, M. (2016). Media regulation, political. In G. Mazzoleni (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of political communication. Oxford; Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc201.
  69. Puppis, M., & Maggetti, M. (2012). The accountability and legitimacy of regulatory agencies in the communication sector. In N. Just & M. Puppis (Eds.), Trends in Communication policy research: New theories, methods and subjects (pp. 75–94). Bristol; Chicago: Intellect.Google Scholar
  70. Puppis, M., Simpson, S., & Van den Bulck, H. (2016). Contextualizing European media policy in the twenty-first century. In S. Simpson, M. Puppis, & H. Van den Bulck (Eds.), European media policy for the twenty-first century (pp. 1–19). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. Reinard, J. C., & Ortiz, S. M. (2005). Communication law and policy: The state of research and theory. Journal of Communication, 55(3), 594–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rowland, W. D. (1984). Deconstructing American communications policy literature. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 1(4), 423–435.Google Scholar
  73. Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration, 80(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Saurwein, F., Just, N., & Latzer, M. (2015). Governance of algorithms: Options and limitations. info, 17(6), 35–49.  https://doi.org/10.1108/info-05-2015-0025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schiller, H. I. (1975). The appearance of national-communications policies: A new arena for social struggle. International Communications Gazette, 21(2), 82–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Siebert, F. S., Peterson, T., & Schramm, W. (1956). Four theories of the press: The authoritarian, libertarian, social responsibility and Soviet communist concepts of what the press should be and do. Champagne: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  77. Torgerson, D. (1985). Contextual orientation in policy analysis: The contribution of Harold D. Lasswell. Policy Sciences, 18(3), 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. van Cuilenburg, J., & McQuail, D. (2003). Media policy paradigm shifts: Towards a new communications policy paradigm. European Journal of Communication, 18(2), 181–207.Google Scholar
  79. van Cuilenburg, J., & Slaa, P. (1993). From media policy towards a national communications policy: Broadening the scope. European Journal of Communication, 8(2), 149–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Van den Bulck, H. (2013). Tracing media policy decisions: Of stakeholders, networks and advocacy coalitions. In M. Price, S. Verhulst, & L. Morgan (Eds.), Routledge handbook of media law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. Van den Bulck, H. (2015). Public service media accountability in recent decades: A Progressive shift from state to market. In K. A. Ibarra, E. Nowak, & R. Kuhn (Eds.), Public service media in Europe: A comparative approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  82. Van den Bulck, H. (2017). Is convergence the “killer bug” in the media ecosystem? The case of Flemish media policymaking 2010–2015. In S. Sparviero, C. Peil, & G. Balbi (Eds.), Media convergence and deconvergence (pp. 241–260). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Van den Bulck, H. (2018). Mediabeleid [Media policy]. Antwerp: University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
  84. Van den Bulck, H., & Donders, K. (2014). Of discourses, stakeholders and advocacy coalitions in media policy: Tracing negotiations towards the new management contract of Flemish public broadcaster VRT. European Journal of Communication, 29(1), 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Van Gompel, R., Van den Bulck, H., & Biltereyst, D. (2002). Media industries. In O. Boyd-Barrett, C. Newbold, & H. Van den Bulck (Eds.), The media book (pp. 162–211). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  86. Windhoff-Héritier, A. (1987). Policy-Analyse. Eine Einführung. Frankfurt a. M. and New York: Campus.Google Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Braman S. (Ed.). (2003). Communication researchers and policy making. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Freedman, D. (2008). The politics of media policy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing policy analysis: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Just, N., & Puppis, M. (Eds.). (2012). Trends in communication policy research: New theories, methods and subjects. Bristol; Chicago: Intellect.Google Scholar
  5. Napoli, P. M., & Gillis, N. (2006). Reassessing the potential contribution of communications research to communications policy: The case of media ownership. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(4), 671–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuel Puppis
    • 1
  • Hilde Van den Bulck
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Communication and Media ResearchUniversity of FribourgFribourgSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of CommunicationDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations