Advertisement

An Efficient Heuristic for Pooled Repair Shop Designs

  • Hasan Hüseyin Turan
  • Shaligram PokharelEmail author
  • Tarek Y. ElMekkawy
  • Andrei Sleptchenko
  • Maryam Al-Khatib
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 966)

Abstract

An effective spare part supply system planning is essential to achieve a high capital asset availability. We investigate the design problem of a repair shop in a single echelon repairable multi-item spare parts supply system. The repair shop usually consists of several servers with different skill sets. Once a failure occurs in the system, the failed part is queued to be served by a suitable server that has the required skill. We model the repair shop as a collection of independent sub-systems, where each sub-system is responsible for repairing certain types of failed parts. The procedure of partitioning a repair shop into sub-systems is known as pooling, and the repair shop formed by the union of independent sub-systems is called a pooled repair shop. Identifying the best partition is a challenging combinatorial optimization problem. In this direction, we formulate the problem as a stochastic nonlinear integer programming model and propose a sequential solution heuristic to find the best-pooled design by considering inventory allocation and capacity level designation of the repair shop. We conduct numerical experiments to quantify the value of the pooled repair shop designs. Our analysis shows that pooled designs can yield cost reductions by 25% to 45% compared to full flexible and dedicated designs. The proposed heuristic also achieves a lower average total system cost than that generated by a Genetic Algorithm (GA)-based solution algorithm.

Keywords

Spare part logistics Repair shop Pooling Heuristic Genetic algorithm 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research was made possible by the NPRP award [NPRP 7-308-2-128] from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of The Qatar Foundation). The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the author[s].

References

  1. 1.
    IATA’s Maintenance Cost Task Force: Airline maintenance cost: executive commentary (2015). https://www.iata.org/whatwedo/workgroups/Documents/MCTF/AMC-Exec-Comment-FY14.pdf. Accessed 30 Aug 2017
  2. 2.
    Keizer, M.C.O., Teunter, R.H., Veldman, J.: Clustering condition-based maintenance for systems with redundancy and economic dependencies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 251(2), 531–540 (2016)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    López-Santana, E., Akhavan-Tabatabaei, R., Dieulle, L., Labadie, N., Medaglia, A.L.: On the combined maintenance and routing optimization problem. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 145, 199–214 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duffuaa, S.O.: Mathematical models in maintenance planning and scheduling. In: Ben-Daya, M., Duffuaa, S.O., Raouf, A. (eds.) Maintenance, Modeling and Optimization, pp. 39–53. Springer, Boston (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4329-9_2Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sherbrooke, C.C.: Metric: a multi-echelon technique for recoverable item control. Oper. Res. 16(1), 122–141 (1968)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sherbrooke, C.C.: Optimal Inventory Modeling of Systems: Multi-echelon Techniques, vol. 72. Springer, New York (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1007/b109856zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Basten, R., Van Houtum, G.: System-oriented inventory models for spare parts. Surv. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 19(1), 34–55 (2014)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arts, J.: A multi-item approach to repairable stocking and expediting in a fluctuating demand environment. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 256(1), 102–115 (2017)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Diaz, A., Fu, M.C.: Models for multi-echelon repairable item inventory systems with limited repair capacity. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 97(3), 480–492 (1997)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rappold, J.A., Van Roo, B.D.: Designing multi-echelon service parts networks with finite repair capacity. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 199(3), 781–792 (2009)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sleptchenko, A., Van der Heijden, M., Van Harten, A.: Trade-off between inventory and repair capacity in spare part networks. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 54(3), 263–272 (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Srivathsan, S., Viswanathan, S.: A queueing-based optimization model for planning inventory of repaired components in a service center. Comput. Ind. Eng. 106, 373–385 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sleptchenko, A., Van der Heijden, M., Van Harten, A.: Effects of finite repair capacity in multi-echelon, multi-indenture service part supply systems. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 79(3), 209–230 (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    de Smidt-Destombes, K.S., van der Heijden, M.C., van Harten, A.: Joint optimisation of spare part inventory, maintenance frequency and repair capacity for k-out-of-n systems. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 118(1), 260–268 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    de Smidt-Destombes, K.S., van der Heijden, M.C., van Harten, A.: Availability of k-out-of-n systems under block replacement sharing limited spares and repair capacity. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 107(2), 404–421 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    de Smidt-Destombes, K.S., van der Heijden, M.C., Van Harten, A.: On the interaction between maintenance, spare part inventories and repair capacity for a k-out-of-n system with wear-out. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 174(1), 182–200 (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    de Smidt-Destombes, K.S., van der Heijden, M.C., van Harten, A.: On the availability of a k-out-of-n system given limited spares and repair capacity under a condition based maintenance strategy. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 83(3), 287–300 (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lau, H.C., Song, H.: Multi-echelon repairable item inventory system with limited repair capacity under nonstationary demands. Int. J. Inventory Res. 1(1), 67–92 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yoon, H., Jung, S., Lee, S.: The effect analysis of multi-echelon inventory models considering demand rate uncertainty and limited maintenance capacity. Int. J. Oper. Res. 24(1), 38–58 (2015)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tracht, K., Funke, L., Schneider, D.: Varying repair capacity in a repairable item system. Procedia CIRP 17, 446–450 (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Driessen, M.A., Rustenburg, J.W., van Houtum, G.J., Wiers, V.C.S.: Connecting inventory and repair shop control for repairable items. In: Zijm, H., Klumpp, M., Clausen, U., Hompel, M. (eds.) Logistics and Supply Chain Innovation, pp. 199–221. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22288-2_12Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jordan, W.C., Graves, S.C.: Principles on the benefits of manufacturing process flexibility. Manage. Sci. 41(4), 577–594 (1995)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jordan, W.C., Inman, R.R., Blumenfeld, D.E.: Chained cross-training of workers for robust performance. IIE Trans. 36(10), 953–967 (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bassamboo, A., Randhawa, R.S., Mieghem, J.A.V.: A little flexibility is all you need: on the asymptotic value of flexible capacity in parallel queuing systems. Oper. Res. 60(6), 1423–1435 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brusco, M.J., Johns, T.R.: Staffing a multiskilled workforce with varying levels of productivity: an analysis of cross-training policies*. Decis. Sci. 29(2), 499–515 (1998)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brusco, M.J.: An exact algorithm for a workforce allocation problem with application to an analysis of cross-training policies. IIE Trans. 40(5), 495–508 (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chou, M.C., Chua, G.A., Teo, C.P., Zheng, H.: Design for process flexibility: efficiency of the long chain and sparse structure. Oper. Res. 58(1), 43–58 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pinker, E.J., Shumsky, R.A.: The efficiency-quality trade-off of cross-trained workers. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2(1), 32–48 (2000)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tsitsiklis, J.N., Xu, K., et al.: On the power of (even a little) resource pooling. Stoch. Syst. 2(1), 1–66 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Andradóttir, S., Ayhan, H., Down, D.G.: Design principles for flexible systems. Prod. Oper. Manag. 22(5), 1144–1156 (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Qin, R., Nembhard, D.A., Barnes II, W.L.: Workforce flexibility in operations management. Surv. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 20(1), 19–33 (2015)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hopp, W.J., Tekin, E., Van Oyen, M.P.: Benefits of skill chaining in serial production lines with cross-trained workers. Manage. Sci. 50(1), 83–98 (2004)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liu, C., Yang, N., Li, W., Lian, J., Evans, S., Yin, Y.: Training and assignment of multi-skilled workers for implementing seru production systems. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 69(5–8), 937–959 (2013)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sayın, S., Karabatı, S.: Assigning cross-trained workers to departments: a two-stage optimization model to maximize utility and skill improvement. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 176(3), 1643–1658 (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hopp, W.J., Oyen, M.P.: Agile workforce evaluation: a framework for cross-training and coordination. IIE Trans. 36(10), 919–940 (2004)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Li, Q., Gong, J., Fung, R.Y., Tang, J.: Multi-objective optimal cross-training configuration models for an assembly cell using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 25(11), 981–995 (2012)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Inman, R.R., Jordan, W.C., Blumenfeld, D.E.: Chained cross-training of assembly line workers. Int. J. Prod. Res. 42(10), 1899–1910 (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tiwari, M., Roy, D.: Application of an evolutionary fuzzy system for the estimation of workforce deployment and cross-training in an assembly environment. Int. J. Prod. Res. 40(18), 4651–4674 (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vairaktarakis, G., Winch, J.K.: Worker cross-training in paced assembly lines. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 1(2), 112–131 (1999)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Slomp, J., Bokhorst, J.A., Molleman, E.: Cross-training in a cellular manufacturing environment. Comput. Ind. Eng. 48(3), 609–624 (2005)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Iravani, S.M., Van Oyen, M.P., Sims, K.T.: Structural flexibility: a new perspective on the design of manufacturing and service operations. Manage. Sci. 51(2), 151–166 (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bokhorst, J.A., Slomp, J., Molleman, E.: Development and evaluation of cross-training policies for manufacturing teams. IIE Trans. 36(10), 969–984 (2004)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schneider, M., Grahl, J., Francas, D., Vigo, D.: A problem-adjusted genetic algorithm for flexibility design. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 141(1), 56–65 (2013)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wallace, R.B., Whitt, W.: A staffing algorithm for call centers with skill-based routing. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 7(4), 276–294 (2005)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ahghari, M., Balcioĝlu, B.: Benefits of cross-training in a skill-based routing contact center with priority queues and impatient customers. IIE Trans. 41(6), 524–536 (2009)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Legros, B., Jouini, O., Dallery, Y.: A flexible architecture for call centers with skill-based routing. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 159, 192–207 (2015)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Tekin, E., Hopp, W.J., Van Oyen, M.P.: Pooling strategies for call center agent cross-training. IIE Trans. 41(6), 546–561 (2009)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Harper, P.R., Powell, N., Williams, J.E.: Modelling the size and skill-mix of hospital nursing teams. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 61(5), 768–779 (2010)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Li, L.L.X., King, B.E.: A healthcare staff decision model considering the effects of staff cross-training. Health Care Manag. Sci. 2(1), 53–61 (1999)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Simmons, D.: The effect of non-linear delay costs on workforce mix. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 64(11), 1622–1629 (2013)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Agnihothri, S.R., Mishra, A.K.: Cross-training decisions in field services with three job types and server-job mismatch. Decis. Sci. 35(2), 239–257 (2004)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Agnihothri, S., Mishra, A., Simmons, D.: Workforce cross-training decisions in field service systems with two job types. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 54, 410–418 (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Colen, P., Lambrecht, M.: Cross-training policies in field services. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 138(1), 76–88 (2012)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Iravani, S.M., Krishnamurthy, V.: Workforce agility in repair and maintenance environments. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 9(2), 168–184 (2007)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    De Bruecker, P., Van den Bergh, J., Beliën, J., Demeulemeester, E.: Workforce planning incorporating skills: state of the art. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 243(1), 1–16 (2015)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Sleptchenko, A., Turan, H.H., Pokharel, S., ElMekkawy, T.Y.: Cross training policies for repair shops with spare part inventories. Int. J. Prod. Econ. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.12.018
  57. 57.
    Turan, H.H., Pokharel, S., Sleptchenko, A., ElMekkawy, T.Y.: Integrated optimization for stock levels and cross-training schemes with simulation-based genetic algorithm. In: International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence, pp. 1158–1163 (2016)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sleptchenko, A., Elmekkawy, T.Y., Turan, H.H., Pokharel, S.: Simulation based particle swarm optimization of cross-training policies in spare parts supply systems. In: The Ninth International Conference on Advanced Computational Intelligence (ICACI 2017), pp. 60–65 (2017)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Al-Khatib, M., Turan, H.H., Sleptchenko, A.: Optimal skill assignment with modular architecture in spare parts supply systems. In: 4th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA), pp. 136–140. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Turan, H.H., Sleptchenko, A., Pokharel, S., ElMekkawy, T.Y.: A clustering-based repair shop design for repairable spare part supply systems. Comput. Ind. Eng. 125, 232–244 (2018)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Turan, H.H., Pokharel, S., Sleptchenko, A., ElMekkawy, T.Y., Al-Khatib, M.: A pooling strategy for flexible repair shop designs. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Operations Research and Enterprise Systems, pp. 272–278 (2018)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Van Harten, A., Sleptchenko, A.: On Markovian multi-class, multi-server queueing. Queueing Syst. 43(4), 307–328 (2003)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Altiok, T.: On the phase-type approximations of general distributions. IIE Trans. 17(2), 110–116 (1985)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Van Der Heijden, M., Van Harten, A., Sleptchenko, A.: Approximations for Markovian multi-class queues with preemptive priorities. Oper. Res. Lett. 32(3), 273–282 (2004)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hasan Hüseyin Turan
    • 1
  • Shaligram Pokharel
    • 2
    Email author
  • Tarek Y. ElMekkawy
    • 2
  • Andrei Sleptchenko
    • 3
  • Maryam Al-Khatib
    • 2
  1. 1.Capability Systems Centre, School of Engineering and Information TechnologyUniversity of New South WalesCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, College of EngineeringQatar UniversityDohaQatar
  3. 3.Department of Industrial and Systems EngineeringKhalifa University of Science and TechnologyAbu DhabiUAE

Personalised recommendations