Advertisement

Psychometric Properties of the Elderly Nursing Core Set

  • César FonsecaEmail author
  • Manuel Lopes
  • David Mendes
  • Pedro Parreira
  • Lisete Mónico
  • Céu Marques
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1016)

Abstract

Aim: To assess the psychometric properties of the Elderly Nursing Core Set.

Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study; convenience sample composed of 427 individuals aged 65 years old or older.

Results: Factor analysis of principal components allowed extracting 4 concepts, i.e., Self-Care, Learning and Mental Functions, Communication, and Relationship with Friends and Caregivers, which explained 82.25% of the total variance. Varimax rotation indicated a very good measure of sampling adequacy (KMO = 0.947), with Bartlett’s test of sphericity (X2(300) = 11131.28, p < 0.001) and an excellent Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.963.

Conclusion: The Elderly Nursing Core Set exhibits excellent psychometric properties, i.e., consistency, reliability, and internal validity, for which reason it is recommended as a means of determining the nursing care needs of individuals aged 65 years old or older and assessing the outcomes of nursing interventions targeting that population.

Keywords

Ageing International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health 

References

  1. 1.
    Bongaarts, J.: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, Sex Differentials in Childhood Mortality. Popul. Dev. Rev. 40(2), 380 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burke, D., Gorman, E., Stokes, D., Lennon, O.: An evaluation of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in critical care using the ICF framework: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Respir. J. 10, 407–420 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Direcção-Geral da Saúde (DGS): Translation of: World Health Organization (resolution WHA54.21). International classification of functioning, disability and health (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    European Commission (EC): Population, Key figures on Europe – 2014 edition. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union (2014). ISSN 2315-201XGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Florin, J., Ehrenberg, A., Ehnfors, M., Björvell, C.: A comparison between the VIPS model and the ICF for expressing nursing content in the health care record. Int. J. Med. Inform. 82(2), 108–117 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    José Lopes, M., Escoval, A., Gamito Pereira, D., Sandra Pereira, C., Carvalho, C., Fonseca, C.: Evaluation of elderly persons’ functionality and care needs. Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem (RLAE) 21, 52–60 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maric, M., de Haan, E., Hogendoorn, S.M., Wolters, L.H., Huizenga, H.M.: Evaluating statistical and clinical significance of intervention effects in single-case experimental designs: An SPSS method to analyse univariate data. Behav. Ther. 46(2), 230–241 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marôco, J.: Análise Estatística com Utilisação do SPSS [Statistical Analysis using SPSS], 6th edn., p. 990. Edições Silabo (2014). ISBN: 9789899676343Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meskell, P., Murphy, K., Shaw, D.G., Casey, D.: Insights into the use and complexities of the Policy Delphi technique. Nurse Res. 21(3), 32–39 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Orem, D.E.: Nursing: Concepts of Practice, 6th edn. Mosby, St. Louis (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pereira, C., Fonseca, C., Escoval, A., Lopes, M.: Contributo para a classificação da funcionalidade na população com mais de 65 anos, segundo a classificação internacional de funcionalidade. Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Pública 19(1), 52–62 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shen, P., Chen, C.: The WHO’s international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF): essential knowledge for nurses. Hu Li Za Zhi (J. Nurs.) 59(6), 92–97 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sidani, S.: Effects of patient-centered care on patient outcomes: an evaluation. Res. Theory Nurs. Pract. 22(1), 24–37 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    So, H., Kim, H., Ju, K.: Prediction model of quality of life in elderly based on ICF model. J. Korean Acad. Nurs. 41(4), 481–490 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    The United Nations 2012 Population Projections (UN). Popul. Dev. Rev. 39(3), 551–555 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    World Bank (WB): The World Bank Annual Report 2014: Year in Review, p. 67 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhu, H.: Correctly selection methods of building up a model function of known categories in SPSS 16.0. J. Capital Inst. Phys. Educ. 26(1), 91–96 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Évora University, Investigator POCTEP 0445_4IE_4_PÉvoraPortugal
  2. 2.Nursing School of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  3. 3.Faculty of Psychology and Educational SciencesUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations