Advertisement

Assessment of Lake Victoria’s Trophic Status Using Satellite-Derived Secchi Disk Depth

  • Ingrid Martha Kintu
  • Anthony Gidudu
  • Lydia Letaru
Conference paper
Part of the Southern Space Studies book series (SOSPST)

Abstract

Trophic status (TS) is a water quality indicator effectively determined from Secchi Disk Depth (SDD). SDD is an in situ method of determining water clarity which is cumbersome, expensive and limited in time and space. This prompted the exploration of satellite imagery which provides a means around these challenges. Whereas algorithms for SDD retrieval from satellite imagery have been developed, their performance has not been tested on Lake Victoria. Therefore, this study aimed at determining the best SDD retrieval algorithm for MODIS satellite imagery from which the lake’s SDD and TS were determined. To this effect, five algorithms were explored and their output was compared to the in situ data collected on 27 July 2015. The multi band model performed best with a R2 of 0.709, RMSD of 0.295 m, RPD of 29.278% and bias of 0.593 m. This algorithm was applied to MODIS Aqua monthly and yearly aggregates from 2013 to 2017 and the trophic status was determined using Carlson’s Trophic Status Index (CTSI). The outputs showed that the water closer to the lake’s shore had a shallower SDD as compared to that in the middle of the lake and the CTSI values indicated that the lake presents as mesotrophic with persistent eutrophic hotspots at the shoreline. It was concluded that Lake Victoria was exhibiting water quality issues and recommended that they are dealt with to prevent its further degradation.

Keywords

Secchi disk depth Trophic status MODIS Lake Victoria Remote sensing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I acknowledge financial support through an IEEE GRSS/AARSE TRAVEL FELLOWSHIP.

References

  1. Cheng, K., Lei, T.: Reservoir trophic state evaluation using Landsat TM data. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 37(5), 1321–1334 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan. Lake Water Quality Report, Appendix E, pp. 1–5 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. Gholizade, M.H., Melesse, A.M., Reddi, L.: Comprehensive review on water quality parameters estimation using remote sensing techniques. Sensors. 16(18), 1–43 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Haseena, M., Malik, M.F.: Water pollution and human health. Environ. Risk Assess. Remediat. 1(3), 16–19 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kahru, M., Kudela, R., Anderson, C., Manzano-Sarabia, M., Mitchell, B.: Evaluation of satellite retrievals of ocean chlorophyll a in the California Current. Remote Sens. 6(9), 8524–8540 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Knight, J.F., Voth, M.L.: Application of MODIS imagery for intra-annual water clarity: assessment of Minnesota Lakes. Remote Sens. 4(7), 2181–2198 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kolding, J., Zwieten, P.V., Mkumbo, O., Silsbe, G., Hecky, R.: Are the Lake Victoria fisheries threatened by exploitation or eutrophication? Towards an ecosystem based approach to management’. In: Bianchi, G., Skjoldal, H.R. (eds.) The Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries, pp. 309–350. FAO, CAB International, Rome (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kratzer, S., Harvey, E.T., Petra, P.: The use of ocean colour remote sensing in integrated coastal zone management – a case study from Himmerfjärden, Sweden. Mar. Policy. 43, 29–39 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee, Z.P., Du, K., Arnone, R.: A model for the diffuse attenuation coefficient of downwelling irradiance. J. Geophys. Res. 110, 1–10 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. Lee, Z.P., Shang, S., Hu, C., Du, K., Weidemann, A., Hou, W., Lin, J., Lin, G.: Secchi disk depth: a new theory and mechanistic model for underwater visibility. Remote Sens. Environ. 169, 139–149 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lung’ayia, H.B.O., M’Harzi, A., Tackx, M., Gichuki, J., Symoens, J.: Phytoplankton community structure and environment in the Kenyan waters of Lake Victoria. Freshw. Biol. 43(4), 529–543 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Morrison, J., Morikawa, M., Murphy, M., Schulte, P.: Water Scarcity and Climate Change: Growing Risks for Businesses and Investors. Ceres, Boston, MA (2009)Google Scholar
  13. Mueller, J.L. SeaWIFS Algorithm for the Diffuse Attenuation Coefficient, K(490), Using Water-Leaving Radiances at 490 and 555 nm, NASA Goddard Space Flight Centre, Greenbelt, MD, USA, pp. 24–27 (2000)Google Scholar
  14. Petra, P., Kratzer, S., Selima, B.M., Strömbeck, N., Stelzer, K.: Satellite-based water quality monitoring in Lake Vänern, Sweden. Int. J. Remote Sens. 37(16), 3938–3960 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shang, S., Lee, Z., Shi, L., Lin, G., Wei, G., Li, X.: Changes in water clarity of the Bohai Sea: observations from MODIS. Remote Sens. Environ. 186, 22–31 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ssebiyonga, N., Erga, S.R., Hamre, B., Stamnes, J.J., Frette, O.: Light conditions and photosynthetic efficiency of phytoplankton in Murchison Bay, Lake Victoria, Uganda. Limnologica. 43(3), 185–193 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Understanding Water Quality, Score Water-Quality Tutorial. http://score.dnr.sc.gov/ktmlpro10/files/uploads/elearning/Understanding_Water_Clarity.pdf (n.d.). Accessed 7 May 2018
  18. Yu, D.F., Xing, Q.G., Lou, M.J., Shi, P.: Retrieval of Secchi disk depth in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea using 8-day MODIS data. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 17, 1–4 (2014)Google Scholar
  19. Ziboon, A.R.T., Al Zubaidy, R.Z., Al Khafaji, M.: Remote sensing model for monitoring trophic state of Al Huweizah Marsh. Eng. Technol. J. 28(16), 5213–5222 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ingrid Martha Kintu
    • 1
  • Anthony Gidudu
    • 1
  • Lydia Letaru
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geomatics and Land ManagementMakerere UniversityKampalaUganda

Personalised recommendations