Advertisement

Conclusion: Decentring Cosplay

  • Garry CrawfordEmail author
  • David Hancock
Chapter
Part of the Leisure Studies in a Global Era book series (LSGE)

Abstract

In this final chapter, we seek to de-centre cosplay and locate this within a consideration of wider social processes and forces, and in particular, what Reckwitz (2017) refers as the creativity dispositif. This argues that creativity (or certainly a version of creativity) has in recent decades become culturally dominant. In particular, it is argued that where creativity was once desired, it is increasingly becoming a requirement of participation in contemporary capitalist consumer culture. However, in cosplay we see an example of room for play. In a world characterised by mass consumption, liquid identities, fluid communities, and speed, summed up by the mantra of ‘move fast and break things’ (Taplin 2017), cosplay, like art, offers some respite, and an opportunity to ‘move slow and make things’.

References

  1. Adorno, T. (1991). The Culture Industry. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Althusser, L. (1976). Essays on Ideology. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Baudrillard, J. (1993). The Transparencies of Evil: Essays on Extreme Phenomena. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Bauman, Z. (1998). Work, Consumerism and the New Poor. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Benjamin, W. (1931). A Small History of Photography. In W. Benjamin (Ed.), (1979), One Way Street and Other Writings. London: Verso. Google Scholar
  6. Collins, J. (1995). Architectures of Excess—Cultural Life in the Information Age. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. de Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Debord, G. (1984 [1967]). The Society of the Spectacle. New York: Black & Red.Google Scholar
  9. Doubleday, S. (2001). Communities of Imagination: Transcending Space, Time and Nationalism in England, Spain and the New America. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, 78(4), 517–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fine, G. A. (1983). Shared Fantasy: Role-Playing Games as Social Worlds. London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gauntlett, R. (2018). Making Is Connecting: The Social Power of Creativity, Form Craft and Knitting to Digital Everything (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gordon, C. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews & Other Writings. 1972–1977. Michel Foucault. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  14. Hodkinson, P. (2002). Goth: Identity, Style and Subculture. Oxford: Berg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, Bloggers and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Khatchikian, A. (2018). Trespassing Borders: Encounters and Resistance in Performance Art. In T. Fillitz & P. van der Grijp (Eds.), An Anthology of Contemporary Art: Practices, Markets, and Collectors (pp. 163–178). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  17. Lamerichs, N. (2018). Productive Fandom: Intermediality and Affective Reception in Fan Cultures. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lefebvre, H. (1991 [1974]). The Production of Space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Marx, K. (1990 [1867]). Capital Vol. 1. London: Penguin Classic.Google Scholar
  20. McRobbie, A. (2016). Be Creative. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  21. Mould, O. (2018). Against Creativity. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  22. Muriel, D., & Crawford, G. (Forthcoming, 2019). Video Games and Agency in Contemporary Society. Games & Culture. Google Scholar
  23. Pine, J., & Gilmore, J. H. (2011). The Experience Economy. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
  24. Reckwitz, A. (2017). The Invention of Creativity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  25. Taplin, J. (2017). Move Fast and Break Things: How Facebook, Google, and Amazon Cornered Culture and Undermined Democracy. Columbus, Georgia: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  26. Thornton, S. (1995). Club Culture: Music, Media & Subcultural Capital. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  27. Veblen, T. (1994 [1899]). The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SalfordSalfordUK

Personalised recommendations