Conclusion: Countering Post-Truth

  • Stuart Sim


The rise of demagoguery around the world in recent years represents a regression from the Enlightenment ideals on which modern society has been constructed. Demagogues make extensive use of post-truth techniques to appeal to the public’s prejudices, and that means that post-truth must be countered more actively than ever if democracy is not to ‘die’, as some commentators have warned can happen. The chapter makes the case for greater emphasis on fact-checking of news reports, looking at the efforts already made in that direction by such organisations as ‘The Centre for Library Literacy’ and ‘Libraries Transform’ in the USA, as well as programmes that have been developed to assess truth-content, such as the ‘CRAAP Test’. Greater control of social media, with legislation at governmental level to back this up, is also urgently required to limit the spread of fake news.


  1. Baggini, Julian, A Short History of Truth: Consolations for a Post-Truth World, London: Quercus, 2017.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, James, Post-Truth: How Bullshit Conquered the World, London: Biteback, 2017.Google Scholar
  3. ‘The CRAAP Test Worksheet’, (accessed 1 January 2018).
  4. D’Ancona, Matthew, Post Truth: The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back, London: Ebury Press, 2017.Google Scholar
  5. Davis, Evan, Post-Truth: Why We Have Reached Peak Bullshit and What We Can Do About It, London: Little, Brown, 2017.Google Scholar
  6. Dollinger, Arielle, ‘Can Librarians Save Us from Fake News?’,…/pgwwgz/can-librarians-save-us-from-fake-news (accessed 2 January 2018).
  7. Keen, Andrew, How to Fix the Future: Staying Human in the Digital Age, London: Atlantic, 2018.Google Scholar
  8. Levitsky, Steven, and Daniel Ziblatt, How Democracies Die: What History Reveals About Our Future, New York: Viking, 2018.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stuart Sim
    • 1
  1. 1.Newcastle upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations