Advertisement

Preventing Future Terrorism: Intervening on Youth Radicalization

  • Alana Siegel
  • Sophie Brickman
  • Zoe Goldberg
  • Ruth Pat-HorenczykEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Integrating Psychiatry and Primary Care book series (IPPC)

Abstract

The international rise of radicalization, particularly prevalent among young adults, is now considered to be a serious and growing security threat to the world. Radicalization is understood to be a precursor to engaging in terrorism-related actions, and intervention is vital. This chapter reviews the various pathways to youth radicalization, followed by a presentation of several theoretical explanations as to why youth may become radicalized. We adopt a trauma-informed perspective for examining the various risk factors for youth radicalization and suggest prevention and intervention programs to counteract this radicalization. This chapter focuses on specific, systemic arenas that can be impacted by radicalization—the family, school, prison, community, internet, and government—and suggests specific means for future interventions in each domain for youth at risk of radicalization. Examining these arenas can provide insight into why combating radicalization remains a daunting task and why it is of critical importance to coordinate activities across the various ecological circles to effectively counter radicalization.

Keywords

Radicalization Trauma Terrorism Interventions Youth Risk factors 

References

  1. Akyüz G, Kuğu N, Şar V, Doğan O. Trauma and dissociation among prisoners. Nord J Psychiatry. 2007;61(3):167–72.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen CE. Threat of Islamic radicalization to the homeland. Testimony before the US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs. Washington, DC: United States Senate; 2007.Google Scholar
  3. Apuzzo M. Only hard choices for parents whose children flirt with terror. The New York Times. 2016. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/10/us/parents-face-limited-options-to-keep-children-from-terrorism.html?_r=0.
  4. Awan I. Muslim prisoners, radicalization and rehabilitation in British prisons. J Muslim Minor Aff. 2013;33(3):371–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azzam M. The radicalization of Muslim communities in Europe: local and global dimensions. Brown J World Aff. 2007;13(2):123–34.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura A, Barbaranelli C, Caprara GV, Pastorelli C. Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;71(2):364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baum NL, Cardozo BL, Pat-Horenczyk R, Ziv Y, Blanton C, Reza A, et al. Training teachers to build resilience in children in the aftermath of war: a cluster randomized trial. Child Youth Care Forum. 2013;42(4):339–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennhold K. Jihad and girl power: how ISIS lured 3 London girls. The New York Times; 2015.Google Scholar
  9. Bergin A. New measures to counter radicalisation in Australian schools. Canberra: Australian Strategic Policy Institute; 2016. https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/new-measures-to-counter-radicalisation-in-australian-schools/.Google Scholar
  10. Best SJ, Krueger BS, Pearson-Merkowitz S. Al Qaeda versus Big Brother: anxiety about government monitoring and support for domestic counterterrorism policies. Polit Behav. 2012;34(4):607–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhui KS, Hicks MH, Lashley M, Jones E. A public health approach to understanding and preventing violent radicalization. BMC Med. 2012;10(1):16.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bigo D, Bonelli L, Guittet E, Ragazzi F. Preventing and countering youth radicalisation in the EU. Brussels: European Parliament Study; 2014.Google Scholar
  13. Bizina M, Gray DH. Radicalization of youth as a growing concern for counter-terrorism policy. Global Secur Stud. 2014;5(1):72–9.Google Scholar
  14. Blair DC (2009). Director of National Intelligence, Annual threat assessment of the intelligence community for the senate select committee on intelligence, 12 February 2009.Google Scholar
  15. Borum R. Radicalization into violent extremism I: a review of social science theories. J Strateg Secur. 2011;4(4):7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Briggs R. Community engagement for counterterrorism: lessons from the United Kingdom. Int Aff. 2010;86(4):971–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brown G, Smith J. Pursue, prevent, protect, prepare: the United Kingdom’s strategy for countering international terrorism. Crown Copyright; 2009.Google Scholar
  18. Buijs FJ, Demant F, Hamdy A. Strijders van eigen bodem. Radicale en democratische moslims in Nederland. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press; 2006.Google Scholar
  19. Chemtob CM, Pat-Horenczyk R, Madan A, Pitman SR, Wang Y, Doppelt O, et al. Israeli adolescents with ongoing exposure to terrorism: suicidal ideation, posttraumatic stress disorder, and functional impairment. J Trauma Stress. 2011;24(6):756–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Christmann K. Preventing religious radicalisation and violent extremism: a systematic review of the research evidence. Research Report. Youth Justice Board; 2012.Google Scholar
  21. Cilluffo F, Saathoff G, Lane J, Cardash S, Whitehead A, Magarik J. NETworked radicalization: a counter-strategy. Special Report by the George Washington University Homeland Security Policy Institute and the University of Virginia Critical Incident Analysis Group; 2007.Google Scholar
  22. Cooper M, Schmidt MS, Schmitt E. Boston suspects are seen as self-taught and fueled by web. The New York Times. 2013; 23.Google Scholar
  23. Council of the European Union. The European Union counter-terrorism strategy. Brussels, Belgium: Council of the European Union; 2005.Google Scholar
  24. Davies G, Neudecker C, Ouellet M, Bouchard M, Ducol B. Toward a framework understanding of online programs for countering violent extremism. J Deradicalization. 2016;6:51–86.Google Scholar
  25. Di Placido C, Simon TL, Witte TD, Gu D, Wong SC. Treatment of gang members can reduce recidivism and institutional misconduct. Law Hum Behav. 2006;30(1):93–114.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Doosje B, Loseman A, van den Bos K. Determinants of radicalization of Islamic youth in the Netherlands: personal uncertainty, perceived injustice, and perceived group threat. J Soc Issues. 2013;69(3):586–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Doosje B, Moghaddam FM, Kruglanski AW, de Wolf A, Mann L, Feddes AR. Terrorism, radicalization and de-radicalization. Curr Opin Psychol. 2016;11:79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dugas M, Kruglanski AW. The quest for significance model of radicalization: implications for the management of terrorist detainees. Behav Sci Law. 2014;32(3):423–39.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Ealing Grid for Learning. Radicalisation - the prevent duty: new preventing extremism in schools services. 2016. https://www.egfl.org.uk/services-children/safeguarding/anti-radicalisation-prevent-duty. Accessed 8 Mar 2017.
  30. FBI. Terrorism: 2002–2005. Federal Bureau of Investigation. https://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terrorism-2002-2005.
  31. Feddes AR, Mann L, Doosje B. Increasing self-esteem and empathy to prevent violent radicalization: a longitudinal quantitative evaluation of a resilience training focused on adolescents with a dual identity. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2015;45(7):400–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Financial Action Task Force. Members and observers. 2004. www.fatf-gafi.org/Members_en.htm.
  33. Fingar KR, Jolls T. Evaluation of a school-based violence prevention media literacy curriculum. Inj Prev. 2014;20(3):183–90.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Fink N, VeenKamp I, Ahlassen W, Barakat R, Zeiger S. The role of education in countering violent extremism: Global Center on Cooperative Security; 2013. http://globalcenter.org/wpcontent/uploads/2013/12/Dec13_Education_Expert_Meeting_Note.pdf.
  35. Fishman S. Community-level indicators of radicalization: a data and methods task force. Report to Human Factors/Behavioral Sciences Division. Science and Technology Directorate, US Department of Homeland Security, College Park, MD: START. 2010, 2010; p. 10.Google Scholar
  36. Fox JA, DeLateur MJ. Mass shootings in America: moving beyond Newtown. Homicide Stud. 2014;18(1):125–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Francis M. What can schools do about radicalisation. 2015. http://www.radicalisationresearch.org/guides/what-can-schools-do-about-radicalisation/. Accessed 25 June 2015.
  38. Ganor B. The counter-terrorism puzzle: a guide for decision makers. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers; 2011.Google Scholar
  39. Ganor B, Falk O. De-radicalization in Israel’s prison system. Stud Conflict Terrorism. 2013;36(2):116–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gielen A-J. Antiradicalisering in België, Denemarken en Duitsland. Tijdschrift voor Sociale Vraagstukken. 2014;1:20–3.Google Scholar
  41. Gielen A-J. Supporting families of foreign fighters. A realistic approach for measuring the effectiveness. J Deradicalization. 2015;2:21–48.Google Scholar
  42. Gill P, Horgan J, Deckert P. Bombing alone: tracing the motivations and antecedent behaviors of lone-actor terrorists. J Forensic Sci. 2014;59(2):425–35.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Glees A, Pope C. When students turn to terror: terrorist and extremist activity on British campuses. London: Social Affairs Unit; 2005.Google Scholar
  44. Greater Boston Regional Collaborative. A framework for prevention and intervenion strategies: incorporating violent extremism into violence prevention efforts: US Attorney’s Office; 2015. https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/usao.
  45. Hegghammer T. Terrorist recruitment and radicalization in Saudi Arabia. Middle East Policy. 2006;13(4):39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Heinke DH, Hunter R. Radicalization of Islamist terrorists in the western world. FBI Law Enforcement Bull. 2011;80(9):25.Google Scholar
  47. Heinkel W, Mace A. Homegrown Islamist terrorism: assessing the threat. J Public Int Aff. 2011;22:109–36.Google Scholar
  48. Hemmingsen A-S. An introduction to the Danish approach to countering and preventing extremism and radicalization. DIIS Reports. København, Denmark: Danish Institute for International Studies; 2015.Google Scholar
  49. Horgan J. From profiles to pathways and roots to routes: perspectives from psychology on radicalization into terrorism. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2008;618(1):80–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hoven CW, Duarte CS, Mandell DJ. Children’s mental health after disasters: the impact of the World Trade Center attack. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2003;5(2):101–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Hunter R, Heinke D. Radicalization of Islamic terrorists in the western world. FBI Law Enforcement Bull. 2011;80:25.Google Scholar
  52. ICPC. Preventing radicalization: a systemic review. International Center for the Prevention of Crime. 2015. http://www.crime-prevention-intl.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/2016/ICPC_Systematic_Review_-_Preventing_Radicalization_2016_1.pdf.
  53. Interpol. Interpol’s activities against the foreign terrorist fighter threat. Interpol. 2015. https://www.interpol.int/en/content/.../Information%20Sheet-Foreign%20Fighter.pdf.
  54. Jaggers JW, Prattini RJ, Church WT. Traumatic stress among seriously delinquent youth: considering the consequences of neighborhood circumstance. Am J Community Psychol. 2016;58(1–2):69–79.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Janbek D, Williams V. Role of the internet post-9/11 in terrorism and counterterrorism. Brown J World Aff. 2013;20:297.Google Scholar
  56. Jasko K, LaFree G, Kruglanski A. Quest for significance and violent extremism: the case of domestic radicalization. Polit Psychol. 2016;38(5):815–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kaplan E. Terrorists and the internet. Council on Foreign Relations. 2009; 8.Google Scholar
  58. Khosrokhavar F. Radicalization in prison: the French case. Polit Religion Ideology. 2013;14(2):284–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kidscape. Extremism and radicalisation awareness training programme. 2017. https://www.kidscape.org.uk/what-we-do/extremism-and-radicalisation-awareness-eara/. Accessed 28 Feb 2017.
  60. King M, Noor H, Taylor DM. Normative support for terrorism: the attitudes and beliefs of immediate relatives of Jema’ah Islamiyah members. Stud Conflict Terror. 2011;34(5):402–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Koehler D. Family counselling as prevention and intervention tool against ‘foreign fighters’. The German Hayat Program. JEX Journal EXIT-Deutschland Zeitschrift für Deradikalisierung und Demokratische Kultur. 2013;3(2013):182–204.Google Scholar
  62. Kricheli I, Rosner Y, Schweitzer Y, Mendelboim A. Suicide attacks in 2016: the highest number of fatalities. INSS Insight. The Institute for National Security Studies; 2017.Google Scholar
  63. Krueger AB. What makes a terrorist: economics and the roots of terrorism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kruglanski AW, Chen X, Dechesne M, Fishman S, Orehek E. Fully committed: suicide bombers’ motivation and the quest for personal significance. Polit Psychol. 2009;30(3):331–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kruglanski AW, Gelfand MJ, Bélanger JJ, Sheveland A, Hetiarachchi M, Gunaratna R. The psychology of radicalization and deradicalization: how significance quest impacts violent extremism. Polit Psychol. 2014;35(S1):69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Leuschner V, Fiedler N, Schultze M, Ahlig N, Göbel K, Sommer F, et al. Prevention of targeted school violence by responding to students’ psychosocial crises: the NETWASS Program. Child Dev. 2017;88(1):68–82.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Malthaner S, Waldmann P. The radical milieu: conceptualizing the supportive social environment of terrorist groups. Stud Conflict Terror. 2014;37(12):979–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Martin MS, Eljdupovic G, McKenzie K, Colman I. Risk of violence by inmates with childhood trauma and mental health needs. Law Hum Behav. 2015;39(6):614.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Matusitz J, Breen G-M. A Solution-based examination of local, state, and national government groups combating terrorism and cyberterrorism. J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2011;21(2):109–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. McCauley C. Testing theories of radicalization in polls of US Muslims. Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2012;12(1):296–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. McCauley C, Moskalenko S. Mechanisms of political radicalization: pathways toward terrorism. Terror Polit Violence. 2008;20(3):415–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Meloy JR, Yakeley J. The violent true believer as a “lone wolf”–psychoanalytic perspectives on terrorism. Behav Sci Law. 2014;32(3):347–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Messina N, Grella C. Childhood trauma and women’s health outcomes in a California prison population. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(10):1842–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Middle East Media Research Institute. MEMRI TV Monitor Project. 2018. https://www.memri.org/tv. Accessed 13 Mar 2017.
  75. Ministry of Refugee Immigration and Integration. Denmark’s deradicalisation efforts. https://www.nyidanmark.dk/NR/rdonlyres/8A7278CB-EFAD-43CC-B6E4-EE81B8E13C6D/0/factsheetderadicalisation.pdf. Accessed 7 Mar 2017 (n.d.).
  76. Mirahmadi H, Farooq M. A community based approach to countering radicalization-a partnership for America, World Organization for Resource, Development and Education (WORDE). Fenton, MI: Islamic Supreme Council of America; 2010.Google Scholar
  77. Mitchell MR. Radicalization in British Columbia secondary schools: the principals’ perspective. J Deradicalization. 2016;6:132–79.Google Scholar
  78. Morris E. Children: extremism and online radicalization. J Child Media. 2016;10(4):508–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Mulcahy E, Merrington S, Bell PJ. The radicalisation of prison inmates: a review of the literature on recruitment, religion and prisoner vulnerability. J Hum Secur. 2013;9(1):4.Google Scholar
  80. Neumann P. Prisons and terrorism. Radicalisation and de-radicalisation in 15 countries. London: International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence; 2010.Google Scholar
  81. Noor S, Hayat S. Deradicalization: approaches and models. Islamabad, Pakistan: Pak Institute; 2009.Google Scholar
  82. North Atlantic Council. NATO and combating radicalization. The European International Model United Nations 2016. 2016. http://teimun.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/NAC_TEIMUN_CombattingRadicalization.pdf.
  83. OSCE. Preventing terrorism and countering violent extremism and radicalization that lead to terrorism: a community-policing approach. The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 2014. http://www.osce.org/atu/111438?download=true.
  84. Özerdem A, Podder S. Child soldiers: from recruitment to reintegration. New York: Springer; 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Pat-Horenczyk R, Peled O, Miron T, Brom D, Villa Y, Chemtob CM. Risk-taking behaviors among Israeli adolescents exposed to recurrent terrorism: provoking danger under continuous threat? Am J Psychiatr. 2007;164(1):66–72.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. Pat-Horenczyk R, Brom D, Baum N, Benbenishty R, Schiff M, Astor RA. A city-wide school-based model for addressing the needs of children exposed to terrorism and war. In: Ardino V, editor. Post-traumatic syndromes in children and adolescents. New York: Wiley; 2011. p. 243–54.Google Scholar
  87. Pauwels L, De Waele M. Youth involvement in politically motivated violence: why do social integration, perceived legitimacy, and perceived discrimination matter? Int J Confl Violence. 2014;8(1):134.Google Scholar
  88. Pauwels L, Brion F, Schils N, Laffineur J, Verhage A, De Ruyver B, et al. Explaining and understanding the role of exposure to new social media on violent extremism: an integrative quantitative and qualitative approach. Ghent: Academia Press; 2014.Google Scholar
  89. Pels T, de Ruyter DJ. The influence of education and socialization on radicalization: an exploration of theoretical presumptions and empirical research. Child Youth Care Forum. 2012;41(3):311–25.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Phillips PJ. Lone wolf terrorism. Peace Econ Peace Sci Public Policy. 2011;17(1):1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Post JM, Sheffer G. The risk of radicalization and terrorism in US Muslim communities. Brown J World Aff. 2007;13(2):101–12.Google Scholar
  92. Precht T. Home grown terrorism and Islamist radicalisation in Europe. From conversion to terrorism. Research report funded by the Danish Ministry of Justice; 2007.Google Scholar
  93. Radicalisation Awareness Network. European Commission. 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/what-we-do/networks/radicalisation_awareness_network_en. Accessed 11 Mar 2017.
  94. Sageman M. Leaderless jihad: terror networks in the twenty-first century. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  95. Scharrer E, Wortman Raring L. A media literacy curriculum on violence in the United States: studying young people’s written responses for evidence of learning. J Child Media. 2012;6(3):351–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Schiff M, Pat-Horenczyk R, Benbenishty R, Brom D, Baum N, Astor RA. High school students’ posttraumatic symptoms, substance abuse and involvement in violence in the aftermath of war. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(7):1321–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Shulman EP, Monahan KC, Steinberg L. Severe violence during adolescence and early adulthood and its relation to anticipated rewards and costs. Child Dev. 2017;88(1):16–26.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  98. Sikkens E, Sieckelinck S, San M, Winter M. Parental reaction towards radicalization in young people. Child Fam Soc Work. 2016;22(2):1044–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Sinclair P. How families can fight online radicalisation, online. Families Against Terrorism (FATE). 2017. http://www.findfate.org/en/home/.
  100. Slootman M, Tillie J. Processes of radicalisation. Why some Amsterdam Muslims become Radicals. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam; 2006.Google Scholar
  101. START. Global Terrorism Database [Data File]. National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. 2016. https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd.
  102. Stein BD, Jaycox LH, Kataoka SH, Wong M, Tu W, Elliott MN, et al. A mental health intervention for schoolchildren exposed to violence: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;290(5):603–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Stemmann JJE. Middle East Salafism’s influence and the radicalization of Muslim communities in Europe. Middle East Rev Int Aff. 2006;10(3)Google Scholar
  104. Stevens T, Neumann PR. Countering online radicalisation: a strategy for action. London: International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence; 2009.Google Scholar
  105. Szmania S. Preventing violent extremism through government and community partnerships. In: Kellet PM, Matyók TG, editors. Communication and conflict transformation through local, regional, and global engagement. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2016. p. 227.Google Scholar
  106. Temple-Raston D. To stop kids from radicalizing, moms in Denmark call other moms. National Public Radio. 2016. http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2016/05/08/476890795/to-stop-kids-from-radicalizing-moms-in-denmark-call-other-moms.
  107. Thakore RV, Apfeld JC, Johnson RK, Sathiyakumar V, Jahangir AA, Sethi MK. School-based violence prevention strategy: a pilot evaluation. J Inj Violence Res. 2015;7(2):45.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  108. The Economist. The plague of global terrorism. 2015. http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2015/11/daily-chart-12.
  109. The White House. Fact sheet: the White House summit on countering violent extremism. Washington, DC: White House Office of the Press Secretary; 2015.Google Scholar
  110. Thomson Reuters & Dinar Standard. State of the global Islamic economy report 2016/17. Dubai: Thomson Reuters; 2016.Google Scholar
  111. European Country of Origin Information Network. Country report on terrorism 2015 - Chapter 2 – Denmark’. U.S. Department of State. 2015. https://www.ecoi.net/local_link/324773/450909_en.html. Accessed 7 Mar 2017.
  112. UNESCO. Preventing violent extremism through education: a guide for policy-makers. London: UNESCO; 2017.Google Scholar
  113. United Nations Counter Terrorism Implementation Task Force. Countering the use of the internet for terrorist purposes-legal and technical aspects. CTITF Working group Compendium. New York: United Nations Counter Terrorism Implementation Task Force (CTITF); 2011. Accessed 7 Mar 2017.Google Scholar
  114. United Nations General Assembly. 59th Session, A/59/565. 2004. http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/instree/report.pdf.
  115. US Department of Homeland Security. 2017. https://www.dhs.gov/countering-violent-extremism. Accessed 13 Mar 2017.
  116. US Department of State. Country reports on terrorism 2015. 2016a. https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/258249.pdf.
  117. US Department of State. US Department of State: Country Report on Terrorism 2015 - Chapter 2 - Denmark. 2016b. http://www.ecoi.net/local_link/324773/450909_en.html. Accessed 11 Mar 2017.
  118. van San M, Sieckelinck S, de Winter M. Ideals adrift: an educational approach to radicalization. Ethics Educ. 2013;8(3):276–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Victoroff J, Adelman J. Why do individuals resort to political violence? Approaches to the psychology of terrorism. In: Breen-Smyth M, editor. The Ashgate research companion to polit viol. London: Routledge; 2016. p. 137–59.Google Scholar
  120. Victoroff J, Adelman JR, Matthews M. Psychological factors associated with support for suicide bombing in the Muslim diaspora. Polit Psychol. 2012;33(6):791–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Vidino L, Brandon J. Countering radicalization in Europe. London: International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence. Accessed 12 Dec 2012.Google Scholar
  122. Vogel DL, Wester SR, Larson LM. Avoidance of counseling: psychological factors that inhibit seeking help. J Couns Dev. 2007;85(4):410–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Vreeman RC, Carroll AE. A systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent bullying. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(1):78–88.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  124. Wallace-Wells B. Terrorists in the family. The New Yorker. 2016. http://www.newyorker.com/news/benjamin-wallace-wells/terrorists-in-the-family.
  125. Weimann G, Von Knop K. Applying the notion of noise to countering online terrorism. Stud Conflict Terror. 2008;31(10):883–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Wigley M. Online radicalization. Military Intelligence Professional Bulletin. 2015;41:60–3. https://fas.org/irp/agency/army/mipb/2015_02.pdf.Google Scholar
  127. Williams LK, Koch MT, Smith JM. The political consequences of terrorism: terror events, casualties, and government duration. Int Stud Perspect. 2013;14(3):343–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Wojcieszak M. “Carrying online participation offline”—mobilization by radical online groups and politically dissimilar offline ties. J Commun. 2009;59(3):564–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Wolff N, Huening J, Shi J, Frueh BC. Trauma exposure and posttraumatic stress disorder among incarcerated men. J Urban Health. 2014;91(4):707–19.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Wolmer L, Hamiel D, Margalit N, Versano-Eisman T, Findler Y, Laor N, et al. Enhancing children’s resilience in schools to confront trauma: the impact on teachers. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2016;53(2):25.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  131. Wright M. Technology and terrorism: how the internet facilitates radicalization. Forensic Examiner. 2008;17(4):14–20.Google Scholar
  132. Yablon YB. Students’ reports of severe violence in school as a tool for early detection and prevention. Child Dev. 2017;88(1):55–67.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  133. Yeste MP. A cognitive-behavioral approach to violent radicalization, based on a real case. Psicol Política. 2014;49:7–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alana Siegel
    • 1
  • Sophie Brickman
    • 1
  • Zoe Goldberg
    • 1
  • Ruth Pat-Horenczyk
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social WelfareThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations