Advertisement

Modular Approach to the Planning of the Robot’s Tasks in the Context of Holons and Graph-Based Methods

  • Krzysztof FoitEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 934)

Abstract

The philosophy of “Industry 4.0” assumes that the contribution of the computer science in the modern industry will intensively grow. The manufacturing tasks are no longer just programs for digitally controlled machines, but are a part of the overall process that includes transport, machine-to-machine communication, and human-machine interfaces that allow the ongoing control of the whole process. Under such circumstances, describing the whole system – or just a part of it – needs to adjust the level of information detail. The key is to find the right level of detail that will guarantee a comprehensible description of the activity performed by the machine, but concomitantly will not contain any information that is redundant at the given level of generality. Robots are special kinds of machines, because apart from the typical handling and manipulation tasks, they also often perform the work that is the part of the machining or assembly process. This involves the higher level of complexity of the code written in the robot’s programming language, but such code is hard to understand for people without the ability of robots’ programming. The paper presents the other way of the description of tasks performed by robots during the manufacturing process that is the modular approach, based on classic, structural programming methods in connection with the holon-based and graph-based methods. Taking into account the dynamic development of modern ways of robots’ programming, the presented method may provide the starting point for further research in the context of task-level programming or programming by demonstration.

Keywords

Manufacturing system Task planning Holon Petri nets 

References

  1. 1.
    Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.-G., Feld, T., Hoffmann, M.: Industry 4.0. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 6, 239–242 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Norman, D.A., Draper, S.W.: User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. L. Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith, D.C., Cypher, A., Tesler, L.: Programming by example: novice programming comes of age. Commun. ACM 43, 75–81 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lieberman, H.: Your Wish is My Command: Programming by Example. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Burlington (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koenig, N., Matarić, M.J.: Robot life-long task learning from human demonstrations: a Bayesian approach. Auton. Robots. 41, 1173–1188 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lozano-Perez, T.: Robot programming. Proc. IEEE 71, 821–841 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hörmann, K., Werling, G., Frommherz, B., Hornberger, J., Pezzinga, A., Gallerini, R., Bison, P., Mirolo, C., Pagello, E., Stocchiero, L.: Task-level programming. In: Integration of Robots into CIM, pp. 122–167. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht (1992)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pedersen, M.R., Nalpantidis, L., Andersen, R.S., Schou, C., Bøgh, S., Krüger, V., Madsen, O.: Robot skills for manufacturing: from concept to industrial deployment. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 37, 282–291 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Csiszar, A., Hoppe, M., Khader, S.A., Verl, A.: Behavior trees for task-level programming of industrial robots. In: Tagungsband des 2. Kongresses Montage Handhabung Industrieroboter, pp. 175–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zieliński, C.: The robots’ programming languages. (in Polish). AutomatykaOnline.pl. http://automatykaonline.pl/Artykuly/Robotyka/jzyki-programowania-robotow-przemysowych. Accessed 09 Jan 2017
  11. 11.
    Muench, S., Kreuziger, J., Kaiser, M., Dillmann, R.: Robot programming by demonstration (RPD)-using machine learning and user interaction methods for the development of easy and comfortable robot programming systems. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Industrial Robots, p. 685 (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Billard, A., Calinon, S., Dillmann, R., Schaal, S.: Robot programming by demonstration. In: Springer Handbook of Robotics, pp. 1371–1394. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Simmons, R., Apfelbaum, D.: A task description language for robot control. In: Proceedings of 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. No. 98CH36190), pp. 1931–1937. IEEE (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Somani, N., Rickert, M., Gaschler, A., Cai, C., Perzylo, A., Knoll, A.: Task level robot programming using prioritized non-linear inequality constraints. In: 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 430–437. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koestler, A.: Beyond atomism and holism - the concept of the Holon. In: Shanin, T. (ed.) The Rules of The Game: Cross-disciplinary Essays on Models in Scholarly Thought, pp. 233–247. Routledge, Abingdon (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Popova-Zeugmann, L.: Timed Petri nets. In: Time and Petri Nets. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Technological Processes Automation and Integrated Manufacturing SystemsSilesian University of TechnologyGliwicePoland

Personalised recommendations