Advertisement

Concept, Physical Design and Simulator of IRYS Social Robot Head

  • Przemysław DąbekEmail author
  • Maciej Trojnacki
  • Piotr Jaroszek
  • Karolina Zawieska
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 934)

Abstract

The paper describes concept behind IRYS social robot and a system of accompanying tools for application in the education and entertainment areas. Some important developments in these areas are pointed out. The concept of a multi-faceted solution of the system is described, which includes the robot and its high fidelity computer simulator. Main assumptions for the robot high-level control system are given, including the concept of lesson scenarios. Because the system is already under development, its current state is described and in particular the current state of the robot head, neck and upper trunk (a bust), where important mechatronic aspects are highlighted. Some illustrative examples of emotions expressed by means of the developed robot bust and its simulator are presented. Possible directions for further development are indicated.

Keywords

Social robot Robot head Emotion expression Physical design Simulator 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was financed from Industrial Research Institute for Automation and Measurements (PIAP), Poland statutory and own research funds.

References

  1. 1.
    Ge, S.S., Matarić, M.J.: Preface. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1(1), 1–2 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Piçarra, N., Giger, J.-C., Pochwatko, G., Możaryn, J.: Designing social robots for interaction at work: socio-cognitive factors underlying intention to work with social robots. J. Autom. Mob. Robot. Intell. Syst. 10, 17–26 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mubin, O., Stevens, C.J., Shahid, S., Al Mahmud, A., Dong, J.-J.: A review of the applicability of robots in education. J. Technol. Educ. Learn. 1(209-0015), 13 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hong, N.W.W., Chew, E., Sze-Meng, J.W.: The review of educational robotics research and the need for real-world interaction analysis. In: 2016 14th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision (ICARCV), pp. 1–6 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benitti, F.B.V.: Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools. Comput. Educ. 58(3), 978–988 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alimisis, D.: Educational robotics: open questions and new challenges. Themes Sci. Technol. Educ. 6(1), 63–71 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fridin, M., Belokopytov, M.: Acceptance of socially assistive humanoid robot by preschool and elementary school teachers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 33, 23–31 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin, C.H., Liu, E.Z.F., Huang, Y.Y.: Exploring parents’ perceptions towards educational robots: gender and socio-economic differences. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 43(1), E31–E34 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Belpaeme, T., Baxter, P., De Greeff, J., Kennedy, J., Read, R., Looije, R., Neerincx, M., Baroni, I., Zelati, M. C.: Child-robot interaction: perspectives and challenges. In: International Conference on Social Robotics, pp. 452–459 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kory, J., Breazeal, C.: Storytelling with robots: learning companions for preschool children’s language development. In: 2014 RO-MAN: The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on the Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 643–648 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Han, J.-H., Kim, D.-H., Kim, J.-W.: Physical learning activities with a teaching assistant robot in elementary school music class. In: 2009 Fifth International Joint Conference on the INC, IMS and IDC, NCM 2009, pp. 1406–1410 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fridin, M.: Storytelling by a kindergarten social assistive robot: a tool for constructive learning in preschool education. Comput. Educ. 70, 53–64 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., Te Boekhorst, R., Billard, A.: Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 4(2), 105–120 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Han, J.: Robot-aided learning and r-learning services. In: Human-Robot Interaction (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Han, J.: Emerging technologies. Robot assisted language learning. Lang. Learn. Technol. 16(3), 1–9 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oh, J.-H., Hanson, D., Kim, W.-S., Han, Y., Kim, J.-Y., Park, I.-W.: Design of android type humanoid robot Albert HUBO. In: 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1428–1433 (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shamsuddin, S., Ismail, L.I., Yussof, H., Zahari, N.I., Bahari, S., Hashim, H., Jaffar, A.: Humanoid robot NAO: review of control and motion exploration. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE), pp. 511–516 (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kȩdzierski, J., Muszyński, R., Zoll, C., Oleksy, A., Frontkiewicz, M.: EMYS-emotive head of a social robot. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 5(2), 237–249 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dickstein-Fischer, L., Alexander, E., Yan, X., Su, H., Harrington, K., Fischer, G.S.: An affordable compact humanoid robot for autism spectrum disorder interventions in children. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS, pp. 5319–5322 (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Al Moubayed, S., Beskow, J., Skantze, G., Granström, B.: Furhat: a back-projected human-like robot head for multiparty human-machine interaction. In: Cognitive behavioural systems, pp. 114–130 (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hirth, J., Schmitz, N., Berns, K.: Emotional architecture for the humanoid robot head ROMAN. In: 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2150–2155 (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pytko, K.: Opracowanie konstrukcji mechanicznej głowy robota społecznego dla dzieci. BEng thesis, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw (2016) (in Polish)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jargot, D.: Opracowanie systemu komunikacji niewerbalnej z człowiekiem dla głowy robota społecznego. BEng thesis, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw (2016) (in Polish)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zygadło, A., Janicki, A., Dąbek, P.: System rozpoznawania mowy polskiej dla robota społecznego. Pomiary Autom. Robot. 20(4), 27–36 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zygadło, A.: System rozpoznawania mowy polskiej dla robota. BEng thesis, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw (2016) (in Polish)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Przemysław Dąbek
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maciej Trojnacki
    • 1
  • Piotr Jaroszek
    • 1
  • Karolina Zawieska
    • 1
  1. 1.Industrial Research Institute for Automation and Measurements (PIAP)WarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations