Distaste for Inequality? The Role of Risk Aversion
Risk aversion is an important argument to explain why individuals may dislike inequality. However, this relationship has not been empirically tested for large representative samples. Using a representative panel for Germany, we estimate this relationship by linking subjective well-being (a proxy for utility), inequality, and self-reported risk attitudes. The results confirm that risk aversion has a positive effect on dislike for inequality: more risk averse individuals are also more inequality averse. This relationship however is partly driven by other individual characteristics (gender, education, and income) that are correlated with risk attitudes.
KeywordsInequality aversion Risk attitudes Subjective well-being German SOEP Panel data
Ada Ferrer-i-Carbonell acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, through the Severo Ochoa Programme for Centres of Excellence in R&D (SEV-2015-0563), from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (ECO2014-59302-P), and the Catalan Government (01414-SGR). Xavier Ramos acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness’ project ECO2016-76506-C4-4-R), and the Catalan Government (SGR2014-1279).
- Cameron, A. C., & Miller, D. L. (2010). Robust inference with clustered data. In A. Ullah & D. E. Giles (Eds.), Handbook of empirical economics and finance (pp. 1–28). Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Dohmen, T. J., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2005). Individual risk attitudes: New evidence from a large, representative, experimentally-validated survey (IZA working paper n.1730). London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
- Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honour of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
- Morawetz, D., Atia, E., Bin-Nun, G., Felous, L., Gariplerden, Y., Harris, E., … & Zarfaty, Y. (1977). Income distribution and self-rated happiness: Some empirical evidence. The Economic Journal, 87(347), 511–522.Google Scholar
- Okun, A. (1975). Equality and efficiency: The big trade-off. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
- Van Praag, B. & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2004). Happiness quantified, a satisfaction calculus approach (Reprint 2008). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Vickerey, W. (1945). Measuring marginal utility by reactions to risk. Econometrica, 13, 215–236.Google Scholar
- Wagner, G. G., Frick, J. R., & Schupp, J. (2007). The German Socio-Economic Panel study (SOEP) – scope, evolution and enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 127, 139–169.Google Scholar
- Wooldrige, J. M., (2006). Cluster-sample methods in applied econometrics: An extended analysis. Unpublished paper. University of Michigan.Google Scholar