Advertisement

Why the Easterlin Paradox? The Scitovsky Hypothesis

  • Maurizio PugnoEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Starting from the mid-1970s and the mid-1990s, Richard Easterlin has provided three key contributions to the development of Happiness Economics. These regard: the existence of the paradox that takes his name, its explanation, and the use of psychological concepts in economics, like happiness and aspirations. Each of these issues is still unresolved. Tibor Scitovsky, working in the same years on the same issues, advanced an explanation of the paradox that endogenizes what are today the most widespread explanations, i.e. those based on adaptation and relative income. Confirmation of his hypothesis can be found in psychology and in economics that now use psychological concepts, like motivations and non-cognitive skills.

References

  1. Almlund, M., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J., & Kautz, T. (2011). Personality psychology and economics. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of economics of education (pp. 1–181). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  2. Bachelet, M., Becchetti, L., & Pisani, F. (2016). Eudaimonic happiness as a leading health indicator (No. 150–2016). Associazione Italiana per la Cultura della Cooperazione e del Non Profit.Google Scholar
  3. Bartolini, S., & Sarracino, F. (2014). Happy for how long? How social capital and economic growth relate to happiness over time. Ecological Economics, 108, 242–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartolini, S., & Sarracino, F. (2015). The dark side of Chinese growth. World Development, 74, 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., & Pugno, M. (2013). Did the decline in social connections depress Americans’ happiness? Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 1033–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beja, E. L. (2014). Income growth and happiness: Reassessment of the Easterlin Paradox. International Review of Economics, 61(4), 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bianchi, M. (2012). A joyful economist. Scitovsky’s memoirs. History of Economic Thought and Policy, 2, 57–73.Google Scholar
  8. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7–8), 1359–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Böckerman, P., Laamanen, J. P., & Palosaari, E. (2016). The role of social ties in explaining heterogeneity in the association between economic growth and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(6), 2457–2479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Boyce, C. J., Wood, A. M., & Powdthavee, N. (2013). Is personality fixed? Personality changes as much as “variable” economic factors and more strongly predicts changes to life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 111(1), 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bruni, L., & Porta, P. L. (2005). Introduction. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Economics and happiness (pp. 1–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, A. E., & Senik, C. (2012). Is happiness di different from flourishing? Revue d’économie politique, 121, 17–34.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, A. E., & Lee, T. (2017). Early-life correlates of later-life well-being: Evidence from the Wisconsin longitudinal study (PSE Working Papers No. 2017-32). London: Centre for Economic Performance.Google Scholar
  15. Clark, A. E., & Senik, C. (2010). Who compares to whom? The anatomy of income comparisons in Europe. The Economic Journal, 120(544), 573–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clark, A. E., Flèche, S., & Senik, C. (2014). The great happiness moderation. In A. E. Clark & C. Senik (Eds.), Happiness and economic growth (pp. 32–138). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clark, A. E., Flèche, S., & Lefkuangfu, W. N. (2017). The long-lasting effects of family and childhood on adult wellbeing: evidence from British cohort data (CEP Discussion Paper No 1493). London: Centre for Economic Performance.Google Scholar
  19. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow. London: Rider.Google Scholar
  20. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Del Mar Salinas-Jiménez, M., Artés, J., & Salinas-Jiménez, J. (2010). Income, motivation, and satisfaction with life: An empirical analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(6), 779–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diener, E., Tay, L., & Oishi, S. (2013). Rising income and the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honour of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  24. Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27(1), 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness. Economic Journal, 111(473), 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Easterlin, R. A. (2005). Building a better theory of well-being. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Economics and happiness (pp. 29–64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Easterlin, R. A. (2015). Happiness and economic growth: The evidence. In W. Glatzer, L. Camfield, V. Møller, & M. Rojas (Eds.), Global handbook of quality of life (pp. 283–299). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Easterlin, R. A. (2016). Paradox lost? (IZA DP. No. 9676).Google Scholar
  29. Easterlin, R. A., McVey, L. A., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O., & Zweig, J. S. (2010). The happiness–income paradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 22463–22468. 201015962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Easterlin, R. A., Morgan, R., Switek, M., & Wang, F. (2012). China’s life satisfaction, 1990–2010. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(25), 9775–9780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fredrickson, B. L., Grewen, K. M., Algoe, S. B., Firestine, A. M., Arevalo, J. M., Ma, J., & Cole, S. W. (2015). Psychological well-being and the human conserved transcriptional response to adversity. PLoS One, 10(3), e0121839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2005). Testing theories of happiness. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Economics and happiness (pp. 116–146). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Heckman, J. (2008). School, skills, and synapses. Economic Inquiry, 46(3), 289–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heckman, J. J., & Corbin, C. O. (2016). Capabilities and skills. Journal of human development and Capabilities, 17(3), 342–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Herbst, C. M. (2011). ‘Paradoxical’decline? Another look at the relative reduction in female happiness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(5), 773–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Huta, V. (2015). An overview of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being concepts. In L. Reinecke & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Handbook of media use and well-being (pp. 14–33).. Chapter 2). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(6), 735–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Krueger, A. B. (2008, May). Comment to B. Stevenson & J. Wolfers Economic growth and happiness (Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, pp 95–100).Google Scholar
  40. Layard, R. (1980). Human satisfactions and public policy. The Economic Journal, 90(360), 737–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  42. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  43. Nikolaev, B. (2016). Does higher education increase hedonic and eudaimonic happiness? (MPRA WP 78438).Google Scholar
  44. Oswald, A. J. (1997). Happiness and economic performance. The Economic Journal, 107(445), 1815–1831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Paul, S., & Guilbert, D. (2013). Income–happiness paradox in Australia: Testing the theories of adaptation and social comparison. Economic Modelling, 30, 900–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pfaff, T., & Hirata, J. (2013). Testing the Easterlin hypothesis with panel data (SOEP papers 554).Google Scholar
  47. Powdthavee, N., & Stutzer, A. (2014). Economic approaches to understanding change in happiness. In K. M. Sheldon & R. E. Lucas (Eds.), Stability of happiness (pp. 219–244). New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pugno, M. (2013). Scitovsky and the income-happiness paradox. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 43, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pugno, M. (2014a). Scitovsky’s ’The Joyless Economy’ and the economics of happiness. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 21(2), 278–303.Google Scholar
  50. Pugno, M. (2014b). Scitovsky, behavioural economics, and beyond. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 8(2014–24), 1–29.Google Scholar
  51. Pugno, M. (2016). On the foundations of happiness in economics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pugno, M. (2017). Scitovsky meets Sen: Endogenising the dynamics of capability. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(4), 1177–1196.Google Scholar
  53. Rojas, M. (2007). Heterogeneity in the relationship between income and happiness: A conceptual-referent-theory explanation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83(1), 10–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schwandt, H. (2014). Unmet aspirations as an explanation for the age U-shape in wellbeing (CEP dp 1229). Bonn: IZA.Google Scholar
  57. Scitovsky, T. (1954). Two concepts of external economies. Journal of Political Economy, 62(2), 143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Scitovsky, T. (1976). The joyless economy: The psychology of human satisfaction (Revised Edition 1992 ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Scitovsky, T. (1986). Human desires and economic satisfaction. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Scitovsky, T. (1995). Economic theory and reality. Aldershot: Elgar.Google Scholar
  61. Scitovsky, T. (1996). My own criticism of ‘The Joyless Economy’. Critical Review, 10(4), 595–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008, May). Economic growth and happiness (Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, pp 1–87).Google Scholar
  63. Veenhoven, R., & Vergunst, F. (2014). The Easterlin illusion: Economic growth does go with greater happiness. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1(4), 311–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and LawUniversity of CassinoCassinoItaly

Personalised recommendations