Advertisement

Does Happiness Improve Welfare Economics a Lot?

  • Gabriel Leite Mota
Chapter

Abstract

The vision that Richard Easterlin had back in the 1970s with its “Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence”, that subjective well-being might be the variable economics should look at to assess the welfare gains from economic growth was a “Columbus’ egg”: no matter how obvious could it be, mainstream economics completely neglected that line of research throughout the twentieth century. This chapter tries to analyse how important is the usage of happiness for the betterment of welfare analysis in economics, contrasting it with both the tools and theoretical apparatus form orthodox welfare economics and the capabilities approach.

References

  1. Arimah, B. C. (1992). Hedonic prices and the demand for housing attributes in a third-world city – The case of Ibadan, Nigeria. Urban Studies, 29(5), 639–651.Google Scholar
  2. Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social choices and individual values. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Benjamin, D. J., Heffetz, O., Kimball, M. S., & Rees-Jones, A. (2014). Can marginal rates of substitution be inferred from happiness data? Evidence from residency choices. American Economic Review, 104(11), 3498–3528.Google Scholar
  4. Bergson, A. (1938). A reformulation of certain aspects of welfare economics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 52(2), 310–334.Google Scholar
  5. Bergson, A. (1954). On the concept of social welfare. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 68(2), 233–252.Google Scholar
  6. Bharadwaj, K. (1972). Marshall on Pigou’s wealth and welfare. Economica, 39(153), 32–46.Google Scholar
  7. Bhattacharya, D. (2015). Nonparametric welfare analysis for discrete choice. Econometrica, 83(2), 617–649.Google Scholar
  8. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Money, sex and happiness: An empirical study. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 393–415.Google Scholar
  9. Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(8), 917–927.Google Scholar
  10. Bruni, L. (2004a). The ‘Happiness transformation problem’in the Cambridge tradition. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 11(3), 433–451.Google Scholar
  11. Bruni, L. (2004b). The “technology of happiness” and the tradition of economic science. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 26(1), 19–44.Google Scholar
  12. Bruni, L., & Stanca, L. (2006). Income aspirations, television and happiness: Evidence from the world values survey. Kyklos, 59(2), 209–225.Google Scholar
  13. Chipman, J. S., & Moore, J. C. (1978). The new welfare economics 1939–1974. International Economic Review, 19(3), 547–584.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. The Economic Journal, 104(424), 648–659.Google Scholar
  15. Clarke, E. H. (1971). Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice, 11(1), 17–33.Google Scholar
  16. Clarke, P. M. (1998). Cost–benefit analysis and mammographic screening: A travel cost approach. Journal of Health Economics, 17(6), 767–787.Google Scholar
  17. Colombo, L., Femminis, G., & Pavan, A. (2014). Information acquisition and welfare. The Review of Economic Studies, 81(4), 1438–1483.Google Scholar
  18. Comim, F. (2005). Capabilities and happiness: Potential synergies. Review of Social Economy, 63(2), 161–176.Google Scholar
  19. Cooter, R., & Rappoport, P. (1984). Were the ordinalists wrong about welfare economics? Journal of Economic Literature, 22(2), 507–530.Google Scholar
  20. Deaton, A., & Stone, A. A. (2013). Two happiness puzzles. American Economic Review, 103(3), 591–597.Google Scholar
  21. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R. J., & Oswald, A. J. (2001). Preferences over inflation and unemployment: Evidence from surveys of happiness. American Economic Review, 91(1), 335–341.Google Scholar
  22. Dickie, M., Delorme, C. D., Jr., & Humphreys, J. M. (1997). Hedonic prices, goods-specific effects and functional form: Inferences from cross-section time series data. Applied Economics, 29(2), 239–249.Google Scholar
  23. Diener, E., & Diener, C. (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7(3), 181–185.Google Scholar
  24. Duclos, J. Y., & Araar, A. (2006). Poverty and equity: Measurement, policy and estimation with DAD (Vol. 2). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honour of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Evrensel, A. Y. (2015). Happiness, economic freedom and culture. Applied Economics Letters, 22(9), 683–687.Google Scholar
  27. Fleurbaey, M., & Mongin, P. (2005). The news of the death of welfare economics is greatly exaggerated. Social Choice and Welfare, 25(2-3), 381–418.Google Scholar
  28. Frank, R. H. (2005). Does absolute income matter? In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Economics and happiness: Framing the analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Frey, B. S. (2008). Happiness: A revolution in economics. Cambridge: MIT press.Google Scholar
  30. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.Google Scholar
  31. Groves, T. (1973). Incentives in teams. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 41, 617–631.Google Scholar
  32. Hailu, G., Boxall, P. C., & McFarlane, B. L. (2005). The influence of place attachment on recreation demand. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(4), 581–598.Google Scholar
  33. Hamilton, J. M. (2007). Coastal landscape and the hedonic price of accommodation. Ecological Economics, 62(3–4), 594–602.Google Scholar
  34. Handel, B. R., & Kolstad, J. T. (2015). Health insurance for “humans”: Information frictions, plan choice, and consumer welfare. American Economic Review, 105(8), 2449–2500.Google Scholar
  35. Hicks, J. R. (1939). The foundations of welfare economics. The Economic Journal, 49(196), 696–712.Google Scholar
  36. Hicks, J. R. (1940). The valuation of the social income. Economica, 7(26), 105–124.Google Scholar
  37. Hicks, J. R. (1943). The four consumer’s surpluses. The Review of Economic Studies, 11(1), 31–41.Google Scholar
  38. Hojman, D. A., & Miranda, A. (2018). Agency, human dignity, and subjective well-being. World Development, 101, 1–15.Google Scholar
  39. Johansson, P. O. (1991). An introduction to modern welfare economics. Cambridge/New York/Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Just, R. E., Hueth, D. L., & Schmitz, A. (2005). The welfare economics of public policy: A practical approach to project and policy evaluation. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2000). Experienced utility and objective happiness: A moment-based approach. In Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge/New York/Melbourne: Cambridge University Press/Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  42. Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 375–406.Google Scholar
  43. Kaldor, N. (1939). Welfare propositions of economics and interpersonal comparisons of utility. The Economic Journal, 49, 549–552.Google Scholar
  44. Laffont, J. J., & Tirole, J. (1986). Using cost observation to regulate firms. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3, Part 1), 614–641.Google Scholar
  45. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. New York: The Penguim Press.Google Scholar
  46. Layard, R. (2006). Happiness and public policy: A challenge to the profession. The Economic Journal, 116(510), C24–C33.Google Scholar
  47. Little, I. M. (1952). Social choice and individual values. Journal of Political Economy, 60(5), 422–432.Google Scholar
  48. Loewenstein, G., Krishnamurti, T., Kopsic, J., & McDonald, D. (2015). Does increased sexual frequency enhance happiness? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 116, 206–218.Google Scholar
  49. Oswald, A. J., & Wu, S. (2010). Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human well-being: Evidence from the USA. Science, 327(5965), 576–579.Google Scholar
  50. Pope, J. C. (2008). Buyer information and the Hedonic: The impact of a seller disclosure on the implicit price for airport noise. Journal of Urban Economics, 63, 498–516.Google Scholar
  51. Powdthavee, N. (2008). Putting a price tag on friends, relatives, and neighbours: Using surveys of life satisfaction to value social relationships. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(4), 1459–1480.Google Scholar
  52. Proto, E., Sgroi, D., & Oswald, A. J. (2012). Are happiness and productivity lower among young people with newly-divorced parents? An experimental and econometric approach. Experimental Economics, 15(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
  53. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  54. Robbins, L. (1932). An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. London: Macmillan and Co., Limited.Google Scholar
  55. Robbins, L. (1945). An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. London: Macmillan and Co., Limited.Google Scholar
  56. Robbins, L. (1981). Economics and political economy. American Economic Review, 71(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
  57. Samuelson, P. A. (1974). Analytical notes on international real-income measures. The Economic Journal, 84, 595–608.Google Scholar
  58. Samuelson, P. A. (1977). Reaffirming the existence of “Reasonable” Bergson-Samuelson social welfare functions. Economica, 44, 81–88.Google Scholar
  59. Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1178–1197.Google Scholar
  60. Sen, A. (1970). The impossibility of a Paretian liberal. Journal of Political Economy, 78(1), 152–157.Google Scholar
  61. Sen, A. (1979a). Personal utilities and public judgements – Or what’s wrong with welfare economics. Economic Journal, 89, 537–558.Google Scholar
  62. Sen, A. (1979b). Utilitarianism and welfarism. The Journal of Philosophy, 76(9), 463–489.Google Scholar
  63. Sen, A. (1983). Liberty and social choice. The Journal of Philosophy, 80(1), 5–28.Google Scholar
  64. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Sen, A. (2000). The discipline of cost-benefit analysis. The Journal of Legal Studies, 29(S2), 931–952.Google Scholar
  66. Sengupta, S., & Osgood, D. E. (2003). The value of remoteness: A hedonic estimation of ranchette prices. Ecological Economics, 44(1), 91–103.Google Scholar
  67. Shrestha, R. K., Seidl, A. F., & Moraes, A. S. (2002). Value of recreational fishing in the Brazilian Pantanal: a travel cost analysis using count data models. Ecological Economics, 42(1–2), 289–299.Google Scholar
  68. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2009). The paradox of declining female happiness. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1(2), 190–225.Google Scholar
  69. Stigler, G. J. (1950). The development of utility theory. I. Journal of Political Economy, 58(4), 307–327.Google Scholar
  70. Stutzer, A. (2004). The role of income aspirations in individual happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54(1), 89–109.Google Scholar
  71. Sugden, R. (2005). Correspondence of sentiments: An explanation of the pleasure of social interaction. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Economics and happiness: Framing the analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Timmins, C., & Murdock, J. (2007). A revealed preference approach to the measurement of congestion in travel cost models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53(2), 230–249.Google Scholar
  73. Tse, R. Y. (2002). Estimating neighbourhood effects in house prices: Towards a new hedonic model approach. Urban Studies, 39(7), 1165–1180.Google Scholar
  74. Van Praag, B. M., & Baarsma, B. E. (2005). Using happiness surveys to value intangibles: The case of airport noise. The Economic Journal, 115(500), 224–246.Google Scholar
  75. Veenhoven, R. (2002). Why social policy needs subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 58(1–3), 33–46.Google Scholar
  76. Viner, J. (1925). The utility concept in value theory and its critics. Journal of Political Economy, 33(6), 638–659.Google Scholar
  77. Wang, Z. (2003). Hedonic prices for crude oil. Applied Economics Letters, 10(13), 857–861.Google Scholar
  78. Wolfe, A. B. (1931). On the content of welfare. The American Economic Review, 207–221.Google Scholar
  79. Zamagni, S. (2005). Happiness and individualism: A very difficult union. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Economics and happiness: Framing the analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriel Leite Mota
    • 1
  1. 1.Independent researcherPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations