Advertisement

Relative Income and Happiness in Latin America: Implications for Inequality Debates

  • Mariano Rojas
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter studies the importance of absolute-income and relative-income effects in explaining people’s well-being in Latin America. A happiness approach is followed. The empirical research uses the Latin American Gallup Survey 2007, with more than 14,000 observations covering all countries in the region and which contains information on household income and on life satisfaction. Reference-groups are constructed on the basis of country-gender-age criteria. It is found that Latin American’s well-being strongly depends on their relative income, while the absolute-income effect is of lesser importance. The relative-income effect is important and significant for all segments of the income distribution. These findings are consistent with Easterlin (1974) and have important implications for the implementation and design of economic policies and development strategies.

Keywords

Happiness Income inequality Relative income Absolute income Latin America 

References

  1. Ball, R. & Chernova, K. (2005). Absolute Income, Relative Income, and Happiness. ManuscriptGoogle Scholar
  2. Binswanger, M. (2006). Why does income growth fail to make us happier? Searching for the treadmills behind the paradox of happiness. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(2), 366–381.Google Scholar
  3. Bossert, W., & D’Ambrosio, C. (2006). Reference groups and individual deprivation. Economic Letters, 90(3), 421–426.Google Scholar
  4. Bossert, W., D’Ambrosio, C., & Peragine, V. (2007). Deprivation and social exclusion. Economica, 74(296), 777–803.Google Scholar
  5. Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. (2003). Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature, 425(6955), 297–299.Google Scholar
  6. Cárdenas, M., di Maro, V., & Mejía, C. (2008). Understanding the role of educational perceptions and victimization on wellbeing. Colombia: Fedesarrollo.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, A. (2007). Happiness, habits and high rank: Comparisons in economic and social life. Working Paper, Paris School of Economics, March.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, A., & Oswald, A. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61(3), 359–381.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, A., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. (2008). Relative income, happiness and utility: An explanation for the easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.Google Scholar
  10. Corneo, G., & Jeanne, O. (1997). On relative wealth effects and the optimality of growth. Economics Letters, 54(1), 87–92.Google Scholar
  11. D’Ambrosio C. & Frick, J. (2004). Subjective well-being and relative deprivation: An empirical link. Discussion Paper 449, DIW Berlin.Google Scholar
  12. De Botton, A. (2004). Status anxiety. Mishawaka, IN: Hamish Hamilton Ltd.Google Scholar
  13. Duesenberry, J. (1949). Income, saving and the theory of consumer behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth (pp. 89–125). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Falk, A., & Knell, M. (2004). Choosing the Joneses: Endogenous goals and reference standards. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 417–435.Google Scholar
  16. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and well-being: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5–6), 997–1019.Google Scholar
  17. Frank, R. (1985). Choosing the right pond. Human behavior and the quest for status. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Frank, R. (1989). Frames of Reference and the Quality of Life. American Economic Review, 79(2), 80–85.Google Scholar
  19. Frank, R. (2000). Luxury fever: Money and happiness in an era of excess. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Frank, R. (2005). Does absolute income matter? In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Economics & happiness: Framing the analysis (pp. 65–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Frijters, P., Haisken-DeNew, J. P., & Shields, M. A. (2004). Money does matter! evidence from increasing real income and life satisfaction in East Germany following reunification. American Economic Review, 94(3), 730–740.Google Scholar
  22. Kingdon, G., & Knight, J. (2007). Community, comparisons and subjective well-being in a divided society. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 64(1), 69–90.Google Scholar
  23. Gasparini, L., Sosa Escudero, W., Marchionni, M. & Olivieri, S. (2008). Income, deprivation, and perceptions in Latin America and the Caribbean: New evidence from the Gallup World Poll. CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.Google Scholar
  24. Gidron, N., & Hall, P. A. (2017). The politics of social status: Economic and cultural roots of the populist right. The British Journal of Sociology, 68(S1), S57–S84.Google Scholar
  25. Graham, C., & Pettinato, S. (2002). Happiness & hardship: Opportunity and insecurity in new market economies. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
  26. Graham, C., & Sukhtankar, S. (2004). Is economic crisis reducing support for markets and democracy in Latin America? Some evidence from the economics of happiness. Journal of Latin American Studies, 36, 349–377.Google Scholar
  27. Hirsch, F. (1976). Social limits to growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hirschman, A. (1973). The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(4), 544–566.Google Scholar
  29. Hyman, H. H. (1960). Reflections on reference groups. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(3), 383–396.Google Scholar
  30. Kapteyn, A., & van Herwaarden, F. G. (1980). Interdependent welfare functions and optimal income distribution. Journal of Public Economics, 14(3), 375–397.Google Scholar
  31. Kapteyn, A., van de Geer, S., van de Stadt, H., & Wansbeek, T. (1997). Interdependent preferences: An econometric analysis. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 12(6), 665–686.Google Scholar
  32. Keynes, J. M. (1931). Economic possibilities of our grandchildren, essays in persuasion. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  33. Knell, M. (1999). Social comparisons, inequality, and growth. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 112(4), 664–695.Google Scholar
  34. Luttmer, E. (2005). Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 963–1002.Google Scholar
  35. Marmot, M. (2004). Status Syndrome. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  36. Marx, K. (1977). Wage Labour and Capital. In D. McLellan (Ed.), Karl Marx: Selected Writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Mazur, A., & Lamb, T. A. (1980). Testosterone, status, and mood in human males. Hormones and Behavior, 14(3), 236–246.Google Scholar
  38. McBride, M. (2001). Relative-income effects on subjective well-being in the cross-section. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 45(3), 251–278.Google Scholar
  39. McBride, M. (2010). Money, happiness, and aspirations: An experimental study. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 74(3), 262–276.Google Scholar
  40. Merton, R., & Kitt, A. (1950). Contribution to the theory of reference group behavior. In R. Merton & P. Lazarsfeld (Eds.), Continuities in social research: Studies in the scope and method of ‘The American Soldier’. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  41. Michalos, A. (1985). Multiple Discrepancy Theory. Social Indicators Research, 16(4), 347–414.Google Scholar
  42. Parducci, A. (1968). The relativism of absolute judgments. Scientific American, 219(6), 84–90.Google Scholar
  43. Parducci, A. (1995). Happiness, pleasure, and judgment: The contextual theory and its applications. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  44. Persky, J., & Tam, M. Y. (1990). Local status and national social welfare. Journal of Regional Science, 30(2), 229–238.Google Scholar
  45. Pham, T. K. C. (2005). Economic growth and status-seeking through personal wealth. European Journal of Political Economy, 21(2), 407–427.Google Scholar
  46. Postlewaite, A. (1998). The social basis of interdependent preferences. European Economic Review, 42(3–5), 779–800.Google Scholar
  47. Robson, A. (1992). Status, the distribution of wealth, private and social attitudes to risk. Econometrica, 60(4), 837–857.Google Scholar
  48. Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in Twentieth-Century England. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Samuelson, L. (2004). Information-based relative consumption effects. Econometrica, 72(1), 93–118.Google Scholar
  50. Schor, J. (1998). The overspent American: Upscaling, downshifting and the new consumer. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  51. Schor, J. (1999). The new politics of consumption: Why Americans want so much more than they need. Boston Review, 24(3–4), 4–9.Google Scholar
  52. Schor, J. (2002). Understanding the new consumerism: Inequality, emulation and the erosion of well being. Tijdschrift voor Sociologie, 23(1).Google Scholar
  53. Senik, C. (2004). Relativizing relative income. Working Paper 2004–17. DELTA.Google Scholar
  54. Senik, C. (2007). Income comparisons. Which income gaps matter most to people? Working Paper 2007–19. Paris School of Economics.Google Scholar
  55. Sloane, P. J., & Williams, H. (2000). Job satisfaction, comparison earnings, and gender. Labour, 14(3), 473–501.Google Scholar
  56. Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. New York: Modern Library. Edition 1937.Google Scholar
  57. Stutzer, A. (2004). The role of income aspirations in individual happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54(1), 89–109.Google Scholar
  58. Suls, J., & Wills, T. A. (1991). Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 237–260). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..Google Scholar
  59. Townsend, P. (1962). The meaning of poverty. British Journal of Sociology, 13(3), 221–223.Google Scholar
  60. Van Praag, B. (1971). The welfare function of income in Belgium: An empirical investigation. European Economic Review, 2(3), 337–369.Google Scholar
  61. Van Praag, B. (1977). The perception of welfare inequality. European Economic Review, 10(2), 189–207.Google Scholar
  62. Van Praag, B. (1993). The relativity of welfare. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 362–385). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  63. Van Praag, B., Kapteyn, A., & van Herwaarden, F. G. (1979). The definition and measurement of social reference spaces. The Netherlands’ Journal of Sociology, 15(1), 13–25.Google Scholar
  64. Van Praag, B., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2004). Happiness quantified: A satisfaction calculus approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Veblen, T. (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class. Reprint 1934. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
  66. Weber, M. (1922). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 1978 English edition as Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mariano Rojas
    • 1
  1. 1.FLACSO-México & UPAEPTlalpan, Ciudad de MéxicoMexico

Personalised recommendations