Advertisement

Happiness at Different Ages: The Social Context Matters

  • John F. HelliwellEmail author
  • Haifang Huang
  • Max B. Norton
  • Shun Wang
Chapter

Abstract

This paper uses a variety of individual-level survey data from several countries to test for interactions between subjective well-being at different ages and variables measuring the nature and quality of the social context at work, at home, and in the community. While earlier studies have found important age patterns (often U-shaped) and social context effects, these two sets of variables have generally been treated as mutually independent. We test for and find several large and highly significant interactions. Results are presented for life evaluations and (in some surveys) for happiness yesterday, in models with and without other control variables. The U-shape in age is found to be significantly flatter, and well-being in the middle of the age range higher, for those who are in workplaces with partner-like superiors, for those living as couples, and for those who have lived for longer in their communities. A strong sense of community belonging is associated with greater life satisfaction at all ages, but especially so at ages 60 and above, in some samples deepening the U-shape in age by increasing the size of the life satisfaction gains following the mid-life low.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Gallup Organization and Statistics Canada for access to data, and the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research for research support. Wang is grateful to the KDI School of Public Policy and Management for financial support. We acknowledge helpful comments from readers and conference participants, especially Andrew Oswald and Arthur Stone.

References

  1. Anusic, I., Yap, S. C., & Lucas, R. E. (2014a). Testing set-point theory in a Swiss national sample: Reaction and adaptation to major life events. Social Indicators Research, 119(3), 1265–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anusic, I., Yap, S. C., & Lucas, R. E. (2014b). Does personality moderate reaction and adaptation to major life events? Analysis of life satisfaction and affect in an Australian national sample. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7–8), 1359–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2008). Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle? Social Science & Medicine, 66(8), 1733–1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2009). The U-shape without controls: A response to Glenn. Social Science & Medicine, 69(4), 486–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2016). Antidepressants and age: A new form of evidence for U-shaped well-being through life. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 127, 46–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2018). Do modern humans suffer a psychological low in midlife? Two approaches (with and without controls) in seven data sets. In M. Rojas (Ed.), The economics of happiness. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Bonke, J., Mortensen, L. H., Ploug, N., & Hansen, A. V. (2017). Explaining inter-area variation in life satisfaction-matched survey and register data. Copenhagen: Statistics Denmark. (revised version of paper presented at the OECD-LSE conference on subjective well-being over the life course, London, December 2016).Google Scholar
  9. Cheng, T. C., Powdthavee, N., & Oswald, A. J. (2015). Longitudinal evidence for a midlife nadir in human well-being: Results from four data sets. Economic Journal, 127(599), 126–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, A. E. (2018). Born to be mild? Cohort effects don’t (fully) explain why well-being is U-shaped in age. In M. Rojas (Ed.), The economics of happiness. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (2006). The curved relationship between subjective well-being and age (PSE Working Papers No. 2006–29).Google Scholar
  12. De Ree, J., & Alessie, R. (2011). Life satisfaction and age: Dealing with underidentification in age-period-cohort models. Social Science & Medicine, 73(1), 177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Easterlin, R. A. (2006). Life cycle happiness and its sources: Intersections of psychology, economics, and demography. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(4), 463–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fortin, N., Helliwell, J. F., & Wang, S. (2015). How does subjective well-being vary around the world by gender and age? In J. F. Helliwell, R. Layard, & J. Sachs (Eds.), World happiness report 2015 (pp. 42–75). New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.Google Scholar
  15. Frijters, P., & Beatton, T. (2012). The mystery of the U-shaped relationship between happiness and age. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 82, 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glenn, N. (2009). Is the apparent U-shape of well-being over the life course a result of inappropriate use of control variables? A commentary on Blanchflower and Oswald (66:8, 2008, 1733–1749). Social Science & Medicine, 69(4), 481–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Graham, C., & Pozuelo, J. R. (2017). Happiness, stress, and age: How the U curve varies across people and places. Journal of Population Economics, 30(1), 225–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grover, S., & Helliwell, J. F. (2017). How’s life? New evidence on marriage and the set point for happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9941-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gwozdz, W., & Sousa-Poza, A. (2010). Ageing, health and life satisfaction of the oldest old: An analysis for Germany. Social Indicators Research, 97(3), 397–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Helliwell, J. F., & Wang, S. (2015). How was the weekend? How the social context underlies weekend effects in happiness and other emotions for US workers. PLoS One, 10(12), e0145123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kassenboehmer, S. C., & Haisken-DeNew, J. P. (2012). Heresy or enlightenment? The well-being age U-shape effect is flat. Economics Letters, 117(1), 235–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Laaksonen, S. (2018). A research note: Happiness by age is more complex than U-shaped. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(1), 471–482.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9830-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Latten, J. J. (1989). Life-course and satisfaction, equal for every-one? Social Indicators Research, 21(6), 599–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mroczek, D. K., & Spiro, A. (2005). Change in life satisfaction during adulthood: Findings from the Veterans Affairs Normative Aging Study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Piper, A. T. (2015). Sliding down the U-shape? A dynamic panel investigation of the age-well-being relationship, focusing on young adults. Social Science & Medicine, 143, 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schilling, O. (2006). Development of life satisfaction in old age: Another view on the ‘Paradox’. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 241–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schwandt, H. (2016). Unmet aspirations as an explanation for the age U-shape in wellbeing. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 122, 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Steptoe, A., Deaton, A., & Stone, A. A. (2015). Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing. Lancet, 385(9968), 640–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stone, A. A., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E., & Deaton, A. (2010). A snapshot of the age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States. PNAS, 107(22), 9985–9990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ulloa, B. F. L., Møller, V., & Sousa-Poza, A. (2013). How does subjective well-being evolve with age? A literature review. Journal of Population Ageing, 6(3), 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Van Landeghem, B. (2012). A test for the convexity of human well-being over the life cycle: Longitudinal evidence from a 20-year panel. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81, 571–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Van Willigen, M. (2000). Differential benefits of volunteering across the life course. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55(5), S308–S318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weiss, A., King, J. E., Inoue-Murayama, M., Matsuzawa, T., & Oswald, A. J. (2015). Evidence for a midlife crisis in great apes consistent with the U-shape in human well-being. PNAS, 109(49), 19949–19952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wunder, C., Wiencierz, A., Schwarze, J., & Küchenhoff, H. (2013). Well-being over the life span: Semiparametric evidence from British and German longitudinal data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(1), 154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xing, Z., & Huang, L. (2014). The relationship between age and subjective well-being: Evidence from five capital cities in mainland China. Social Indicators Research, 117(3), 743–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yap, S., Anusic, I., & Lucas, R. (2012). Does personality moderate reaction and adaptation to major life events? Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(5), 477–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • John F. Helliwell
    • 1
    Email author
  • Haifang Huang
    • 2
  • Max B. Norton
    • 1
  • Shun Wang
    • 3
  1. 1.Vancouver School of EconomicsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  3. 3.KDI School of Public Policy and ManagementSejongSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations