Advertisement

Different Versions of the Easterlin Paradox: New Evidence for European Countries

  • Caspar F. Kaiser
  • Maarten C. M. VendrikEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

According to the Easterlin Paradox, richer people are happier than poorer people, but when a country becomes richer over time, its people do not become happier. There is debate on whether this paradox holds. To shed light on this controversy, we distinguish between five different versions of the paradox. They apply to either groups of countries or individual countries, and to either the long or the medium term. We argue that the long term is most appropriate for testing the paradox, and that tests of the paradox should control for an autonomous time trend. We conduct such tests by estimating country-panel equations for mean life satisfaction in 27 European countries that include trend and cyclical components of per capita GDP as regressors. Concerning groups of countries, we find a robust confirmation of the long- and medium-term versions of the paradox for a group of nine Western and Northern European countries. Moreover, we obtain a non-robust rejection of the medium-term variant of the paradox for a set of 11 Eastern European countries. Regarding individual countries, the medium-term variant of the paradox holds for the nine Western and Northern European countries, but is rejected for Greece, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Bulgaria, Lithuania, and Poland.

Keywords

Easterlin Paradox happiness life satisfaction economic growth Hodrick-Prescott filter European country panel 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Erik de Regt for econometric advice, Marta Golin for advice on using Stata, Guy Mayraz and Ruut Veenhoven for sending us their data sets, Daniel Sacks and Justin Wolfers for information about their research, and John Barkley Rosser Jr., Robert Dur, Richard Easterlin, Ari Kapteyn, Maurizio Pugno, Mariano Rojas, Francesco Sarracino, and other participants of the International Conference on Policies for Happiness and Health in Siena, March 19–21, 2018, and the USC Happiness Conference at the occasion of the retirement of Richard Easterlin in Los Angeles, April 6, 2018, for helpful comments.

References

  1. Angeles, L. (2011). A closer look at the Easterlin Paradox. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40, 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartolini, S., & Sarracino, F. (2014). Happy for how long? How social capital and economic growth relate to happiness over time. Ecological Economics, 108(Suppl. C), 242–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., & Pugno, M. (2013a). Did the decline in social connections depress Americans’ happiness? Social Indicators Research, 110, 1033–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., & Sarracino, F. (2013b). Predicting the trend of well-being in Germany: How much do comparisons, adaptation and sociability matter? Social Indicators Research, 114(2), 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beja, E. L. (2014). Income growth and happiness: reassessment of the Easterlin Paradox. International Review of Economics, 61(4), 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruno, G. S. (2005a). Approximating the bias of the LSDV estimator for dynamic unbalanced panel data models. Economics Letters, 87(3), 361–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruno, G. S. F. (2005b). XTLSDVC: Stata module to estimate bias corrected LSDV dynamic panel data models, Statistical Software Components S450101, revised 08 Sep. 2005. Boston: Boston College Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  9. Burns, A. F., & Mitchell, W. C. (1946). Measuring business cycles. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  10. Cameron, A. C., & Miller, D. L. (2015). A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. The Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 317–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, A. E. (2011). Income and happiness: Getting the debate straight. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 6, 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark, A. E., Flèche, S., & Senik, C. (2014). The great happiness moderation. In A. E. Clark & C. Senik (Eds.), Happiness and economic growth: Lessons from developing countries (pp. 32–139). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deaton, A. (2008). Income, health, and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2), 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Destatis. (2017a). Bruttoinlandsprodukt, Bruttowertschöpfung in den Ländern. Retrieved July 2, 2017, from https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/VolkswirtschaftlicheGesamtrechnungen/VGRderLaender/VGR_LaenderergebnisseBand1.html
  15. Destatis. (2017b). Publikation – Preise – Verbraucherpreisindex für Deutschland – Lange Reihen ab 1948. Retrieved November 10, 2017, from https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/Preise/Verbraucherpreise/VerbraucherpreisindexLangeReihen.html
  16. Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013a). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 497–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diener, E., Tay, L., & Oishi, S. (2013b). Rising income and the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. Nations and Households in Economic Growth, 89, 89–125.Google Scholar
  19. Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27(1), 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Easterlin, R. A. (2005). Feeding the illusion of growth and happiness: A reply to Hagerty and Veenhoven. Social Indicators Research, 74(3), 429–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Easterlin, R. A. (2009). Lost in transition: Life satisfaction on the road to capitalism. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71(2), 130–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Easterlin, R. A. (2015). Happiness and economic growth: The evidence. In W. Glatzer, L. Camfield, V. Møller, & M. Rojas (Eds.), Global handbook of quality of life (pp. 283–299). International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Easterlin, R. A. (2017). Paradox lost? Review of Behavioral Economics, 4(4), 311–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Easterlin, R. A., & Sawangfa, O. (2010). Happiness and economic growth: Does the cross section predict time trends? Evidence from developing countries. In E. Diener & D. Kahneman (Eds.), International differences in well-being (pp. 166–216).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Easterlin, R. A., McVey, L. A., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O., & Zweig, J. S. (2010). The happiness-income paradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(52), 22463–22468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Feenstra, R. C., Inklaar, R., & Timmer, M. P. (2015). The next generation of the Penn World Table. The American Economic Review, 105(10), 3150–3182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gruen, C., & Klasen, S. (2013). Income, inequality, and subjective well-being: an international and intertemporal perspective using panel data. Jahrbuch Für Wirtschaftsgeschichte / Economic History Yearbook, 54(1), 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hamilton, J. D. (2017). Why you should never use the Hodrick-Prescott filter. Review of Economics and Statistics, Just accepted MS, available online,  https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00706, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heske, G. (2009). Volkswirtschaftliche Gesamtrechnung DDR 1950-1989. Daten, Methoden, Vergleiche. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, Supplement, 21, 1–356.Google Scholar
  30. Hodrick, R. J., & Prescott, E. C. (1997). Postwar U.S. business cycles: An empirical investigation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 29(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. IMF. (2016). World economic outlook database. Retrieved July 2, 2017, from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2016/02/weodata/index.aspx
  32. Inman, P. (2016, July 12). Irish economy surges 26% as revised figures take in foreign investment. The Guardian, Business. Retrieved June 29, 2017, from https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jul/12/irish-economic-growth-revised-figures-foreign-investment-aircraft
  33. Kaiser, C. W., & Vendrik, M. C. M. (2018). Different versions of the Easterlin Paradox: New evidence for European countries. IZA DP No. 11994. Bonn: IZA.Google Scholar
  34. Layard, R., Mayraz, G., & Nickell, S. J. (2010). Does relative income matter? Are the critics right? In E. Diener, J. Helliwell, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), International differences in wellbeing (pp. 139–165). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. OECD. (2017). Level of GDP per capita and productivity. Retrieved July 2, 2017, from https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=PDB_LV#
  36. Opfinger, M. (2016). The Easterlin paradox worldwide. Applied Economics Letters, 23(2), 85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Proto, E., & Rustichini, A. (2013). A reassessment of the relationship between GDP and life satisfaction. PLoS One, 8(11), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ravn, M. O., & Uhlig, H. (2002). On adjusting the Hodrick-Prescott filter for the frequency of observations. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2), 371–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sacks, D. W., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2012). Subjective well-being, income, economic development and growth. In P. Booth (Ed.), The pursuit of happiness: Well-being and the role of government (pp. 59–97). London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  40. Sacks, D. W., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2013). Growth in income and subjective well-being over time. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  41. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 2008(1), 1–87.Google Scholar
  42. UNCTAD. (2017). Gross domestic product: Total and per capita, current and constant (2005) prices, annual, 1970–2015. Retrieved July 2, 2017, from http://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=96
  43. Veenhoven, R. (2011). Trend average happiness in nations 1946–2010: How much people like the life they live. Trend Report Average Happiness. World Database of Happiness, Happiness in Nations. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.Google Scholar
  44. Veenhoven, R., & Hagerty, M. (2006). Rising happiness in nations 1946—2004: A reply to Easterlin. Social Indicators Research, 79(3), 421–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Veenhoven, R., & Vergunst, F. (2014). The Easterlin illusion: economic growth does go with greater happiness. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1(4), 311–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vendrik, M. C. M. (2013). Adaptation, anticipation and social interaction in happiness: An integrated error-correction approach. Journal of Public Economics, 105, 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wooldridge, J. M. (2003). Introductory econometrics; A modern approach (2nd ed.). Mason: South-Western Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  48. World Bank. (2017). World Development Indicators. Retrieved July 2, 2017, from http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=2

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caspar F. Kaiser
    • 1
    • 2
  • Maarten C. M. Vendrik
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
    Email author
  1. 1.Nuffield CollegeOxford UniversityOxfordUK
  2. 2.DSPIOxford UniversityOxfordUK
  3. 3.Department of Macro, International and Labour Economics (MILE), SBE, Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  4. 4.ROA, SBE, Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  5. 5.IZABonnGermany
  6. 6.EHEROErasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations