When Does Economic Growth Improve Well-Being?

  • Francesco SarracinoEmail author


Is economic growth the way to pursue better lives? After the second world war, many industrialized countries experienced an unprecedented economic growth that significantly improved people’s living conditions. However, the raising wealth did not result in higher well-being. This conclusion is inconsistent with the well established belief that economic growth is the way to improve the human lot. In this chapter I discuss the evidence on some of the conditions for durable improvements in well-being, namely promoting social capital, and reducing income inequality. I conclude that the quality of growth matters for well-being and that it is possible to adopt policies to make economic growth and well-being compatible.



This article reflects the view of the author and does not engage in any way STATEC Research, ANEC and funding partners. The author gratefully acknowledges the support of the Observatoire de la Compétitivité, Ministère de l’Economie, DG Compétitivité, Luxembourg and STATEC. The author wishes to thank Stefano Bartolini, Andrew Clark, Joshua K. Dubrow, Malgorzata Mikucka, Kelsey O’Connor, Chiara Peroni, and the participants to the “Economics of Happiness” conference in honor of prof. Richard Easterlin (Los Angeles, April 6 2018) and to the “International Conference on Policies for Happiness and Health” (Siena, March 19–21 2018). Possible errors or omissions are entirely the responsibility of the author.


  1. Bartolini, S. (2014). Manifesto for Happiness: Shifting society from money to well-being. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania University Press. forthcoming.Google Scholar
  2. Bartolini, S. & Bilancini, E. (2011). Social participation and hours worked. Department of Economics University of Siena 620, Department of Economics, University of Siena.Google Scholar
  3. Bartolini, S., & Bonatti, L. (2008). Endogenous growth, decline in social capital and expansion of market activities. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 67(3), 917–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartolini, S., & Sarracino, F. (2014). Happy for how long? How social capital and economic growth relate to happiness over time. Ecological Economics, 108, 242–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartolini, S., & Sarracino, F. (2015). The dark side of Chinese growth: Declining social capital and well-being in times of economic boom. World Development, 74, 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartolini, S., & Sarracino, F. (2017). Twenty-five years of materialism: Do the US and Europe diverge? Social Indicators Research, 133(2), 787–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., & Pugno, M. (2013a). Did the decline in social connections depress Americans’ happiness? Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 1033–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., & Sarracino, F. (2013b). Predicting the trend of well-being in Germany: How much do comparisons, adaptation and sociability matter? Social Indicators Research, 3(114), 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., & Sarracino, F. (2016). Social capital predicts happiness: World-wide evidence from time series. In S. Bartolini, E. Bilancini, L. Bruni, & P. Porta (Eds.), Policies for happiness (pp. 175–198). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bartolini, S., Mikucka, M., & Sarracino, F. (2017). Money, trust and happiness in transition countries: Evidence from time series. Social Indicators Research, 130(1), 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Becchetti, L., Giachin Ricca, E., & Pelloni, A. (2009). The 60es turnaround as a test on the causal relationship between sociability and happiness. Econometica Working Papers wp07, Econometica.Google Scholar
  12. Becchetti, L., Trovato, G., & Bedoya, D. (2011). Income, relational goods and happiness. Applied Economics, 43(3), 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beja, E. L. (2014). Income growth and happiness: Reassessment of the Easterlin Paradox. International Review of Economics, 61(4), 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blanchflower, D. (2009). International evidence on well-being in measuring the subjective well-being of nations: National accounts of time use and well-being, Krueger (editor).Google Scholar
  15. Blanchflower, D., & Oswald, A. (2004). Money, sex and happiness: An empirical study. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 393–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(8), 917–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brockmann, H., Delhey, J., Welzel, C., & Yuan, H. (2009). The China puzzle: Falling happiness in a rising economy. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bruni, L., & Porta, P. (2007). Handbook on the Economics of Happiness. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bruni, L., & Stanca, L. (2008). Watching alone: Relational goods, television and happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 65(3), 506–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clark, A. E., & D’Ambrosio, C. (2015). Attitudes to income inequality: Experimental and survey evidence. In Handbook of income distribution (Vol. 2, pp. 1147–1208). Elsevier.Google Scholar
  21. Clark, A. E., Flèche, S., & Senik, C. (2012). The great happiness moderation (SOEPpapers on multidisciplinary panel data research 468). Berlin: DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Deaton, A. (2008). Income, health, and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2), 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2009). Beyond the Hedonic Treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), The science of well-being. Social indicators research series (Vol. 37, pp. 103–118). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honour of moses abramovitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  25. Easterlin, R. A. (2009). Lost in transition: Life satisfaction on the road to capitalism. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71(2), 130–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Easterlin, R. A. (2013). Happiness, growth, and public policy. Economic Inquiry, 51(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Easterlin, R. A., & Angelescu, L. (2009). Happiness and growth the world over: Time series evidence on the happiness-income paradox (IZA discussion paper, (4060)). Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).Google Scholar
  28. Easterlin, R. A., Angelescu, L., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O., & Zweig, J. S. (2010). The happiness-income paradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(52), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Easterlin, R. A., Morgan, R., Switek, M., & Wang, F. (2012). China’s life satisfaction, 1990–2010. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(25), 9775–9780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Easterlin, R. A., Wang, F., & Wang, S. (2017). Growth and happiness in China, 1990–2015. In J. F. Helliwell, R. Layard, & J. D. Sachs (Eds.), World happiness report 2017 (pp. 48–83). New York: USA Sustainable Development Solutions Network.Google Scholar
  31. Frank, R. H. (1997). The frame of reference as a public good. The Economic Journal, 107(445), 1832–1847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frederick, S., & Loewenstein, G. (1999). Hedonic adaptation. In D. Kanheman & E. Diener (Eds.), The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Graham, C., & Felton, A. (2006). Inequality and happiness: Insights from Latin America. Journal of Economic Inequality, 4(1), 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20(2), 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Helliwell, J. (2006). Well-being, social capital and public policy: What’s new? The Economic Journal, 116(510), 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Helliwell, J. (2007). Well-being and social capital: Does suicide pose a puzzle? Social Indicators Research, 81(3), 455–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Helliwell, J. F. (2008). Life satisfaction and quality of development (Working paper 14507). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Helliwell, J. (2011). Institutions as enablers of wellbeing: The Singapore prison case study. International Journal of Well-Being, 1(2), 255–265. Scholar
  39. Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions: Royal Society of London Series Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1435–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hirsch, F. (1976). Social limits to growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. New York: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  43. Mikucka, M., Sarracino, F., & Dubrow, J. K. (2017). When does economic growth improve life satisfaction? Multilevel analysis of the roles of social trust and income inequality in 46 countries, 1981–2012. World Development, 93, 447–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. OECD. (2001). The evidence on social capital. In The well-being of nations: The role of human and social capital (pp. 39–63). Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oishi, S., & Kesebir, S. (2015). Income inequality explains why economic growth does not always translate to an increase in happiness. Psychological science, 26(10), 1630–1638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Diener, E. (2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological science, 22(9), 1095–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ono, H., & Kristen, S. L. (2016). Redistributing happiness: How social policies shape life satisfaction. Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
  48. Polanyi, K. (1968). The great transformation. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  49. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York/London/Toronto/Sidney: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  50. Rogers, S. H., Halstead, J. M., Gardner, K. H., & Carlson, C. H. (2011). Examining walkability and social capital as indicators of quality of life at the municipal and neighborhood scales. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 6(2), 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sacks, D. W., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2012). Subjective well-being, income, economic development and growth. In P. Booth (Ed.), The pursuit of happiness (pp. 59–98). London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  52. Sarracino, F. (2013). Richer in money, poorer in relationships and unhappy? Time series comparisons of social capital and well-being in Luxembourg. Social Indicators Research, 115(2), 561–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sarracino, F., & Mikucka, M. (2017). Social capital in Europe from 1990 to 2012: Trends and convergence. Social Indicators Research, 131(1), 407–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schimmack, U., Krause, P., Wagner, G., & Schupp, J. (2010). Stability and change of well-being: An experimentally enhanced latent state-trait-error analysis. Social Indicators Research, 95(1), 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schneider, L., & Schimmack, U. (2009). Self-informant agreement in well-being ratings: A meta-analysis. Social Indicators Research, 94(3), 363–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In E. D. Kahneman & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonist psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  57. Steele, L. G., & Lynch, S. M. (2013). The pursuit of happiness in China: Individualism, collectivism, and subjective well-being during China’s economic and social transformation. Social Indicators Research, 114(2), 441–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Truyts, T. (2010). Social status in economic theory. Journal of Economic Surveys, 24(1), 137–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Uhlaner, C. (1989). Relational goods and participation: Incorporating sociability into a theory of rational action. Public Choice, 62, 253–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Van Praag, B., Frijters, P., & Ferrer-i Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 51(1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Van Reekum, C., Urry, H., Johnstone, T., Thurow, M., Frye, C., Jackson, C., Schaefer, H., Alexander, A., & Davidson, R. (2007). Individual differences in amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex activity are associated with evaluation speed and psychological well-being. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(2), 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Veenhoven, R., & Vergunst, F. (2013). The Easterlin illusion: Economic growth does go with greater happiness. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1(4), 311–343.Google Scholar
  63. Wanous, J. P., & Hudy, M. J. (2001). Single-item reliability: A replication and extension. Organizational Research Methods, 4(4), 361–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques du Grand-Duché du Luxembourg (STATEC)Luxembourg CityLuxembourg
  2. 2.LCSR National Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations