Advertisement

Conclusion: The Campaign of Personalized Conflict

  • Heather E. YatesEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in US Elections book series (PSUSE)

Abstract

This chapter offers concluding remarks about emotive context of the presidential campaign and which emotional dimensions had significant influence on voters’ decisions—leading voters to interpret personal feelings as salient political information on specific policy issues. It also reviews thematic and distinctive patterns from the findings that point to evidence that lends support to the negative partisanship framework, and the 2016 presidential campaign along with some possible implications intimated by this evidence.

Keywords

Emotions in politics Negative partisanship 2016 campaign 

References

  1. Abramowitz, Alan I. The Great Alignment: Race, Party Transformation, and the Rise of Donald Trump. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018. Google Scholar
  2. Azari, Julia. “Weak Parties and Strong Partisanship Are a Bad Combination.” Mischiefs of Faction. November 3, 2016.Google Scholar
  3. Barbaranelli, Claudio, Gian Vittorio Caprara, Michele Vecchione, and Chris R. Fraley. “Voters’ Personality Traits in Presidential Elections.” Personality and Individual Differences 42, no. 7 (2007): 1199–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caprara, Gian Vittorio. “The Personalization of Modern Politics.” European Review 15, no. 2 (2007): 151–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Claibourn, Michelle P. Presidential Campaigns and Presidential Accountability. Chicago: University of Illinois, 2011.Google Scholar
  6. Lau, Richard R., and David P. Redlawsk. How Voters Decide: Information Processing in Election Campaigns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Google Scholar
  7. Marcus, George E., W. Russell Neuman, and Michael MacKuen. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000. Google Scholar
  8. Steenbergen, Marco R., and Milton Lodge. “Process Matters: Cognitive Models of Candidate Evaluation.” In Electoral Democracy, ed. Michael MacKuen and George Rabinowitz. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  9. Swan, Kyle. “Moral Judgment and Emotions.” The Journal of Value Inquiry 38 (2004): 375–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Watson, David, and Auke Tellegen. “Toward a Consensual Structure of Mood.” Psychological Bulletin 98, no. 2 (1985): 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of Central ArkansasConwayUSA

Personalised recommendations