Advertisement

The Politics of “America First”: Problematizing the Economy and Trade on the Campaign Trail

  • Heather E. YatesEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in US Elections book series (PSUSE)

Abstract

The economy is frequently a reliable predictor of electoral outcomes. In 2016, there were some distinctive pivots from conventional discussion of economic indicators. The Trump campaign introduced policy proposals that pointed to policies and practices that engendered protectionist behavior on part of the USA that marked a notable departure from conventional Republican positions and, more widely, US policy on trade. This chapter examines the rhetoric that revolved around the topic of the US economy and trade. The analysis examines voters’ candidate affect response toward Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton and how it affected appraisals of the US economy and policy directed at managing the role of the USA in free-trade agreements.

Keywords

Lewis-Beck Tien model Economic recovery The economy Free trade Trade agreements Globalism American-first 

References

  1. Bishaw, Alemayehu. “Poverty: 2009 and 2010: American Community Survey Briefs.” U.S. Census Bureau. Accessed at https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2011/acs/acsbr10-01.pdf. October 2011.
  2. Desliver, Drew. For Most Workers, Real Wages Have Barely Budged for Decades. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, 2014. Google Scholar
  3. Doherty, Carroll, Jocelyn Kiley, Alec Tyson, and Bridget Jameson. “Beyond Distrust: How Americans View Their Government.” Retrieved from Pew Research Center http://www.people-press.org/files/2015/11/11-23-2015-Governance-release.pdf. November 23, 2015.
  4. Cramer, Katherine J. The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016. Google Scholar
  5. Garrett, Geoffrey. “Trump’s Economic Plan Looks Like Reaganomics 2.0.” The Wharton Magazine. December 19, 2016.Google Scholar
  6. Gearan, Anne, and David Nakamura. “Hillary Clinton Comes Out Against Obama’s Pacific Trade Deal.” The Washington Post. October 7, 2015.Google Scholar
  7. Harwood, John. “With No Edge on the Economy, Clinton and Trump Focus Elsewhere.” The New York Times. September 8, 2016.Google Scholar
  8. Kaplan, Rebecca. “Hillary Clinton Breaks with Obama on Trans-Pacific Partnership.” CBS News. Accessed at https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clinton-breaks-with-obama-on-trans-pacific-partnership/. October 7, 2015.
  9. Karabell, Zachary. “Whose Economy Will It Be in 2016?” Politico. November 4, 2014.Google Scholar
  10. Kazin, Michael. “Trump and American Populism.” Foreign Affairs 95 no. 6 (2016, November/December): 17–24.Google Scholar
  11. Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Charles Tien. “The Political Economy Model: 2016 US Election Forecasts.” PS: Political Science & Politics 49, no. 4 (2016): 661–663.Google Scholar
  12. Mellow, Nicole E. “Voting Behavior: Continuity and Confusion in the Electorate.” In The Elections of 2016 (pp. 87–110). Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2018. Google Scholar
  13. Mishel, Lawrence, Elise Gould, and Josh Bivens. “Wage Stagnation in Nine Charts.” Economic Policy Institute 6, (2015): 2–13. Google Scholar
  14. Morin, Rich. The Disappearing Male Worker. Washington, DC: The Pew Research Institute, 2013. Google Scholar
  15. ———. Share of Counties Where Whites Are a Minority Has Doubled Since 1980. Washington, DC: Pew Research Institute (2015). Google Scholar
  16. Sides, John, Michael Tesler, and Lynn Vavreck. “The Electoral Landscape of 2016.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 667, no. 1 (2016): 50–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tritch, Teresa. “The Economy Has Slowed Down.” The New York Times. August 1, 2016.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of Central ArkansasConwayUSA

Personalised recommendations