Advertisement

Why Emotions Matter in Politics

  • Heather E. YatesEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in US Elections book series (PSUSE)

Abstract

This chapter provides a summary overview of some traditional approaches in political science to better understand the function of emotions in voting behavior. It articulates the research question that anchors the book: Do voters’ feelings toward candidate influence their support of campaigns issues? The meaning of the discrete feelings subject to analysis here, pride, hope, anger, fear, and disgust is briefly explained. The theories that justify the academic exploration of emotions in politics in the 2016 presidential campaigns include affective intelligence theory, the transfer-of-affect thesis, and the rise of negative partisanship. A brief outline of the book details the campaign issues examined throughout the chapters.

Keywords

Affective intelligence theory Affect transfer Negative partisanship Emotions in politics 

References

  1. Abramowitz, Alan I. The Great Alignment: Race, Party Transformation, and the Rise of Donald Trump. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
  2. Abramowitz, Alan I., and Steven Webster. “The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of US Elections in the 21st Century.” Electoral Studies 41 (2016): 12–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldrich, John H., Jamie L. Carson, Brad T. Gomez, and David W. Rohde. Change and Continuity in the 2016 Elections. Thousand Oaks: CQ Press, 2018.Google Scholar
  4. Ben-ze’ve, Aaron. The Subtlety of Emotions. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. Bitecofer, Rachel. The Unprecedented 2016 Presidential Election. New York: Springer, 2017.Google Scholar
  6. Ceaser, James W., Andrew E. Busch, and John J. Pitney Jr. Defying the Odds: The 2016 Elections and American Politics. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017. Google Scholar
  7. Crotty, William J. Winning the Presidency 2016. Abingdon: Routledge, 2018. Google Scholar
  8. Flanigan, William H., Nancy H. Zingale, Elizabeth A. Theiss-Morse, and Michael W. Wagner. Political Behavior of the American Electorate. Thousand Oaks: CQ Press, 2015. Google Scholar
  9. Granberg, Donald, and Thad A. Brown. “On Affect and Cognition in Politics.” Social Psychology Quarterly 52 (September 1989): 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huddy, Leonie, and Anna H. Gunnthorsdottir. “The Persuasive Effects of Emotive Visual Imagery: Superficial Manipulation or the Product of Passionate Reason?” Political Psychology 21 (2000): 745–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson, Dennis W., and Lara M. Brown, eds. Campaigning for President 2016: Strategy and Tactics. Abingdon: Routledge, 2017. Google Scholar
  12. Kam, Cindy D., and Beth A. Estes. “Disgust and Public Opinion.” Working Paper, 2012.Google Scholar
  13. ———. “Disgust Sensitivity and Public Demand for Protection.” The Journal of Politics 78, no. 2 (2016): 481–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lodge, Milton, and Charles S. Taber. The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  15. MacKuen, Michael, George E. Marcus, W. Russell Neuman, and Luke Keele. “The Third Way: The Theory of Affective Intelligence and American Democracy.” The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior (2007): 124–151.Google Scholar
  16. Marcus, George E. “The Structure of Emotional Response: 1984 Presidential Candidates.” American Political Science Review 82, no. 3 (1988): 737–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ———. “Emotions in Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science no. 3 (2000): 221–250.Google Scholar
  18. ———. The Sentimental Citizen: Emotion in Democratic Politics. University Park: Penn State Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  19. ———. “The Measure and Mismeasure of Emotion.” In Feeling Politics: Emotion in Political Information Processing, ed. David P. Redlawsk. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.Google Scholar
  20. Marcus, George E., and Michael B. MacKuen. “Anxiety, Enthusiasm, and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement During Presidential Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 87, no. 3 (1993): 672–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marcus, George E., W. Russell Neuman, and Michael Mackuen. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  22. Marcus, George E., W. Russell Neuman, Michael MacKuen, and John L. Sullivan. “Dynamic Models of Emotional Response: The Multiple Role of Affect in Politics.” Research in Micropolitics 5 (1996): 33–59.Google Scholar
  23. Nelson, Michael, ed. The Elections of 2018. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2018. Google Scholar
  24. Sabato, Larry, Kyle Kondik, and Geoffrey Skelley, eds. Trumped: The 2016 Election That Broke All the Rules. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017. Google Scholar
  25. Simon, Herbert A. “Motivational and Emotional Controls of Cognition.” Psychological Review 74 (1967): 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Snyder, C.R. “Hypothesis: There Is Hope.” In Handbook of Hope: Theory, Measures and Applications, ed. C.R. Snyder. San Diego: Academic, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Steenbergen, Marco R., and Christopher Ellis. “Fear and Loathing in American Elections: Context, Traits, and Negative Candidate Affect.” In Feeling Politics, 109–133. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Suomi, S. J., H. F. Harlow, M. Zuckerman, and C.D. Spielberger. “Emotions and Anxiety: New Concepts, Methods, and Applications.” (1976).Google Scholar
  29. Wayne, Stephen J. The Road to the White House 2016. Boston: Cengage Learning, 2017.Google Scholar
  30. Westen, Drew. The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation. New York: Perseus Book Group, 2007.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of Central ArkansasConwayUSA

Personalised recommendations