Advertisement

On the Simulation (and Energy Costs) of Human Intelligence, the Singularity and Simulationism

  • Alan F. T. WinfieldEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Emergence, Complexity and Computation book series (ECC, volume 35)

Abstract

For many the Holy Grail of robotics and AI is the creation of artificial persons: artefacts with equivalent general competencies as humans. Such artefacts would literally be simulations of humans. With the theme of simulation this essay reflects on both the simulation of intelligence and the associated energy costs across three broad and controversial topics: first, how to design (or evolve) human-equivalent AI, second, the prospects of an intelligence explosion once the first has been achieved, and third, simulationism—the idea that we are ourselves simulations in a simulated universe.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence (AI) Artificial general intelligence (AGI) Energy Simulation The singularity Simulationism 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am deeply grateful to Susan Stepney, not only for many conversations on topics as broad ranging as AI, Complexity, Narrative, Science Fiction and Simulation, but also for the opportunity to participate in several projects, including EPSRC funded Complex Systems Modelling and Simulation (CoSMoS) [14], and the York Workshops on Narrative and Complexity [15]; it is these conversations and projects that forced me to really think about simulation.

References

  1. 1.
    Bhatnagar, S., Alexandrova, A., Avin, S., Cave, S., et al.: Mapping intelligence: requirements and possibilities. In: Müller, V.C. (ed.) Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence 2017 (PT-AI 2017), vol. 44, pp. 117–135. Springer, Cham (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bostrum, N.: Are you living in a computer simulation? Philos. Q. 53(211), 243–255 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bostrom, N.: Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chalmers, D.: The singularity: a philosophical analysis. J. Conscious. Stud. 17(9–10), 765 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dawkins, R.: The Ancestors Tale. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hernández-Orallo, J.: The Measure of all Minds: Evaluating Natural and Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    IEEE Standards Association: Ethically aligned design: a vision for prioritizing human well-being with autonomous and intelligent systems, version 2. IEEE Standards Association (2017). https://ethicsinaction.ieee.org/
  8. 8.
    Jakobi, N., Husbands, P., Harvey, I.: Noise and the reality gap: the use of simulation in evolutionary robotics. Advances in Artificial Life, pp. 704–720. Springer, Berlin (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jirotka, M., Grimpe, B., Stahl, B., Eden, G., Hartswood, M.: Responsible research and innovation in the digital age. Commun. ACM 60, 62–68 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Müller, V.C., Bostrom, N.: Future progress in artificial intelligence: a survey of expert opinion. In: Müller, V.C. (ed.) Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence. Synthese Library (Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science), vol. 376. Springer, Cham (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pfiefer, R., Bongard, J.: How the Body Shapes the Way We Think: A New View of Intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shanahan, M.: The Technological Singularity. MIT Press, Cambridge (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Silver, D., et al.: Mastering the game of go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature 529, 484–489 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stepney, S., Polack, F.A.C., Alden, K., Andrews, P.S., et al.: Engineering Simulations as Scientific Instruments: A Pattern Language. Springer, Berlin (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Walsh, R., Stepney, S. (eds.): Narrating Complexity. Springer, Berlin (2018)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Winfield, A.F.: Estimating the energy cost of (artificial) evolution. In: Sayama, H., Rieffel, J., Risi, S., Doursat, Ren and Lipson, H. (eds.) Artificial Life 14: 14th International Conference on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems, New York, 31 July–2 August 2014, pp. 872–875 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Winfield, A.F.: How intelligent is your intelligent robot? (2017). arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.08878

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bristol Robotics LaboratoryUWEBristolUK

Personalised recommendations