Advertisement

Putting Natural Time into Science

  • Roger White
  • Wolfgang BanzhafEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Emergence, Complexity and Computation book series (ECC, volume 35)

Abstract

This contribution argues that the notion of time used in the scientific modeling of reality deprives time of its real nature. Difficulties from logic paradoxes to mathematical incompleteness and numerical uncertainty ensue. How can the emergence of novelty in the Universe be explained? How can the creativity of the evolutionary process leading to ever more complex forms of life be captured in our models of reality? These questions are deeply related to our understanding of time. We argue here for a computational framework of modeling that seems to us the only currently known type of modeling available in Science able to capture aspects of the nature of time required to better model and understand real phenomena.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This essay was written on the occasion of the Festschrift for Susan Stepney’s 60th birthday. It is dedicated to Susan, whose work has been so inspiring and deep.

References

  1. 1.
    Amrine, F.: The Metamorphosis of the Scientist, vol. 5, pp. 187–212. North American Goethe Society (1990)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banzhaf, W., Baumgaertner, B., Beslon, G., Doursat, R., Foster, J., McMullin, B., de Melo, V., Miconi, T., Spector, L., Stepney, S., White, R.: Defining and simulating open-ended novelty: requirements, guidelines, and challenges. Biosciences 135, 131–161 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barbour, J.: The End of Time: The Next Revolution in Our Understanding of the Universe. Oxford University Press (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bergson, H.: Creative Evolution, vol. 231. University Press of America (1911)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dobzhansky, T.: Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Am. Biol. Teach. 35, 125–129 (1973)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dodig-Crnkovic, G.: Significance of models of computation, from turing model to natural computation. Minds Mach. 21, 301–322 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fredkin, E.: An introduction to digital philosophy. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 42, 189–247 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Irvine, A., Deutsch, H.: Russell’s paradox. In: Zalta, E. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/russell-paradox (2016). Winter
  9. 9.
    Langton, C.: Computation at the edge of chaos: phase transitions and emergent computation. Phys. D 42, 12–37 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Latour, B.: Enquête sur les modes d’existence. Une anthropologie des Modernes, Découverte (La) (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu, S., McDermid, J.A.: Dynamic sets and their application in VDM. In: Proceedings of the 1993 ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing: States of the Art and Practice, pp. 187–192. ACM (1993)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller, E.: The Vegetative Soul. From Philosophy of Nature to Subjectivity in the Feminine. Suny Press (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nicolis, G., Prigogine, I.: Self-organization in Nonequilibrium Systems: From Dissipative Structures to Order Through Fluctuations. Wiley, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Popper, K.: The Open Universe. Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, NJ (1982)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prigogine, I.: From Being to Becoming: Time and Complexity in the Physical Sciences. W.H. Freeman and Co., New York (1981)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prigogine, I.: The End of Certainty. Simon and Schuster (1997)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Prigogine, I., Stengers, I.: Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. Bantam Books (1984)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rosen, R.: Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry into the Nature, Origin, and Fabrication of Life. Columbia University Press (1991)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosen, R.: Essays on Life Itself. Columbia University Press (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schemm, E., Gannon, W., Wishne, C., Halperin, W., Kapitulnik, A.: Observation of broken time-reversal symmetry in the heavy-fermion superconductor UPt3. Science 345(6193), 190–193 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smith, B.: Behavioral reflection in programming languages. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, MIT (1982)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Smolin, L.: Time Reborn: From the Crisis in Physics to the Future of the Universe. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sobel, J.M., Friedman, D.P.: An introduction to reflection-oriented programming. In: Proceedings of Reflection, vol. 96 (1996)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stepney, S., Hoverd, T.: Reflecting on open-ended evolution. In: Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Artificial Life (ECAL-2001), pp. 781–788. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang, Y.: The real-time process algebra (RTPA). Ann. Softw. Eng. 14, 235–274 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang, Y.: Software science: on the general mathematical models and formal properties of software. J. Adv. Math. Appl. 3, 130–147 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang, Y.: A denotational mathematical theory of system science: system algebra for formal system modeling and manipulations. J. Adv. Math. Appl. 4, 132–157 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wolfram, S.: A New Kind of Science. Wolfram Science Inc. (2002)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yanofsky, N.S.: The Outer Limits of Reason: What Science, Mathematics, and Logic Cannot Tell Us. MIT Press (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyMemorial University of NewfoundlandSt. John’sCanada
  2. 2.BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action and Department of Computer Science and EngineeringMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations