Advertisement

Insights on the Marginalization of Poor Children in the Education System of Trinidad and Tobago

  • Jerome De Lisle
Chapter

Abstract

Evidence points to multiple, intersecting marginalizations within the education system of Trinidad and Tobago. These are attributed to retained colonial structures, policies, practices, and institutional processes, as well as individual behaviors, beliefs, and expectations. The intersectionality of marginalization has not been well researched, with emphasis instead upon a few identity variables, most notably gender. Little is known about the critical role of socioeconomic status (SES), although there is strong evidence of urban and rural poverty. This chapter attempts to address this gap in knowledge by exploring the relationship between SES and achievement in Trinidad and Tobago. Evidence is drawn from primary and secondary analyses of data of International Learning Assessments (ILAs) and from National Learning Assessments (NLAs). ILA data show that poverty is concentrated in many secondary schools because of early selection at 11+. NLA data show sharp differences across geographic regions and gender. Evidence is also gathered from a local exploratory study of school SES, in which a multidimensional SES construct was developed and used as a proxy for family and childhood poverty. Although traditional components of school SES such as parental occupation and parental education were important, an expanded measure that included neighborhood, housing, and family structure effects appeared to add significant explanatory value. To explain the role of SES, I explore theory on social, cultural, and economic capital, arguing that relational cultural capital and social capital might be the primary determinants of socioeconomic disadvantage within this context.

Keywords

Caribbean Poverty Socioeconomic status Marginalization Inequality in education 

References

  1. Alexander, V., & Maeda, Y. (2015). Understanding student achievement in mathematics and science: The case of Trinidad and Tobago. Prospects, 45(4), 577–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen, I. G., & Jæger, M. M. (2015). Cultural capital in context: Heterogeneous returns to cultural capital across schooling environments. Social Science Research, 50, 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bacchus, M. K. (1980). Education for development or underdevelopment: Guyana’s educational system and its implications for the Third World. Waterloo, Canada: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bacchus, M. K. (2008). The education challenges facing small nation states in the increasingly competitive global economy of the twenty-first century. Comparative Education, 44(2), 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonal, X. (2007). On global absences: Reflections on the failings in the education and poverty relationship in Latin America. International Journal of Educational Development, 27(1), 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bos, M. S., Elias, A., Vegas, E., & Zoido, P. (2017). PISA in Latin America and the Caribbean: How do poor and rich students perform? Policy Brief 6. Washington, DC: IDB. Retrieved from http://repositorio.minedu.gob.pe/handle/MINEDU/5629Google Scholar
  7. Braithwaite, L. (1953). Social stratification in Trinidad: A preliminary analysis. Social and Economic Studies, 2(2/3), 5–175.Google Scholar
  8. Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G. J., & Aber, J. L. (1997). Neighborhood poverty: Vol. 1. Context and consequences for children. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  9. Caldas, S. J., & Cornigans, L. (2015). Race/ethnicity and social capital among middle-and upper-middle-class elementary school families: A structural equation model. School Community Journal, 25(1), 137.Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, C. C. (1996). The young colonials: A social history of education in Trinidad and Tobago, 1834–1939. Mona, Kingston, Jamaica: University of West Indies Press.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, C. C. (1997). Endless education: Main currents in the education system of modern Trinidad and Tobago, 1939–1986. Mona, Kingston, Jamaica: University of West Indies Press.Google Scholar
  12. Caro, D. H., & Cortés, D. (2012). Measuring family socioeconomic status: An illustration using data from PIRLS 2006. IERI Monograph Series. Issues and Methodologies in Large-Scale Assessments, 5, 9–33.Google Scholar
  13. Chan Tack, C. (2017, September 17). PP poverty report wrong. Trinidad and Tobago Newsday [online]. Retrieved from http://newsday.co.tt/2017/09/17/pp-poverty-report-wrong/
  14. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Connell, R. (1994). Poverty and education. Harvard Educational Review, 64(2), 125–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cowan, C. D., Hauser, R., Kominski, R., Levin, H., Lucas, S., Morgan, S., & Chapman, C. (2012). Improving the measurement of socioeconomic status for the national assessment of educational progress: A theoretical foundation. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  17. Cross, M. (1979). Urbanization and urban growth in the Caribbean. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. De Lisle, J. (2007). The construction of a representative sample of public primary schools in Trinidad and Tobago and an achievement related database: Support for seamless education system project (TT-L1005). St Clair, POS: Trinidad and Tobago Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  19. De Lisle, J. (2012). Secondary school entrance examinations in the Caribbean: Legacy, policy, and evidence within an era of seamless education. Caribbean Curriculum, 19, 109–143.Google Scholar
  20. De Lisle, J. (2016). Evolving data use policy in Trinidad and Tobago: The search for actionable knowledge on educational improvement in a small island developing state. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(1), 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Lisle, J. (2018). The development of theory on gendered patterns of achievement in the Anglophone Caribbean: Insights, contradictions, and silences. Gender & Education, 30(4), 450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Lisle, J., Mohammed, R., & Lee-Piggott, R. (2014). Explaining Trinidad and Tobago’s system response to international assessment data. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(4), 487–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Lisle, J., Seunarinesingh, K., Mohammed, R., & Lee-Piggott, R. (2017). Using an iterative mixed-methods research design to investigate schools facing exceptionally challenging circumstances within Trinidad and Tobago. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(3), 406–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. De Lisle, J., Smith, P., & Jules, V. (2005). Which males or females are most at risk and on what? An analysis of gender differentials within the primary school system of Trinidad and Tobago. Educational Studies, 31(4), 393–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. De Lisle, J., Smith, P., & Jules, V. (2010). Evaluating the geography of gendered achievement using large-scale assessment data from the primary school system of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(4), 405–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. De Lisle, J., Smith, P., Keller, C., & Jules, V. (2012). Differential outcomes in high-stakes eleven plus testing: The role of gender, geography, and assessment design in Trinidad and Tobago. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(1), 45–64.Google Scholar
  27. De Lisle, J., Seecharan, H., & Ayodike, A. T. (2010, March). Is the Trinidad and Tobago education system structured to facilitate optimum human capital development? New findings on the relationship between education structures and outcomes from National and International Assessments. Paper presented at the 11th Annual SALISES conference, Port of Spain, Trinidad & Tobago.Google Scholar
  28. Downey, D. B. (1995). When bigger is not better: Family size, parental resources, and children’s educational performance. American Sociological Review, 60, 746–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Duncan, G. J., Yeung, W. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Smith, J. R. (1998). How much does childhood poverty affect the life chances of children? American Sociological Review, 60, 406–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Engle, P. L., & Black, M. M. (2008). The effect of poverty on child development and educational outcomes. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1136(1), 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Forza, C. (2002). Survey research in operations management: A process-based perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 152–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. García, S., & Ritterbusch, A. (2015). Child poverty in Colombia: Construction of a multidimensional measure using a mixed-method approach. Child Indicators Research, 8(4), 801–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Garner, C. L., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1991). Neighborhood effects on educational attainment: A multilevel analysis. Sociology of Education, 64(4), 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gershoff, E. T., Aber, J. L., & Raver, C. C. (2003). Child poverty in the United States: An evidence-based conceptual framework for programs and policies. In F. Jacobs, D. Wertlieb, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of applied developmental science: Promoting positive child, adolescent, and family development through research, policies, and pro- grams (Vol. 2, pp. 81–136). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  35. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Guo, G., & Harris, K. M. (2000). The mechanisms mediating the effects of poverty on children’s intellectual development. Demography, 37(4), 431–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hamel-Smith, A. L. (1983). The history of education in Trinidad, 1900–1938 (Unpublished thesis). St. Augustine: The University of the West Indies.Google Scholar
  38. Harwell, M. (2018). Don’t expect too much: The limited usefulness of common SES measures and a prescription for change. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Centre, School of Education, University of Colorado, Boulder. Retrieved from https://www.greatlakescenter.org/docs/Policy_Briefs/Harwell-SES-Measures.pdfGoogle Scholar
  39. Henry-Lee, A. (2005). A nature of poverty in the garrison constituencies in Jamaica. Environment & Urbanisation, 17(2), 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hickling-Hudson, A. (2004). Towards Caribbean ‘knowledge societies’: Dismantling neo-colonial barriers in the age of globalisation. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 34(3), 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hickling-Hudson, A. (2015, March). Caribbean schooling and the social divide—what will it take to change neo-colonial education systems? Paper presented at CIES 2015, Washington, DC. Retrieved from: http://cies2015.org/response-hickling-hudson.html. Accessed 17 Feb 2015.
  42. Hinkle, D. E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2003). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  43. Huberty, C., & Olejnik, S. (2006). Applied MANOVA and discriminant analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jargowsky, P. (2014). Concentration of poverty in the new millennium. Washington, DC: The Century Foundation and Rutgers Center for Urban Research and Education.Google Scholar
  45. Juhn, Y. J., Beebe, T. J., Finnie, D. M., Sloan, J., Wheeler, P. H., Yawn, B., & Williams, A. R. (2011). Development and initial testing of a new socioeconomic status measure based on housing data. Journal of Urban Health, 88(5), 933–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kairi Consultants Ltd. (2007). Analysis of the 2005 survey of living conditions for Trinidad and Tobago. Retrieved from http://vision2020.info.tt/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=100&Itemid=1Google Scholar
  47. Kambon, A., & Busby, L. (2000). Education and its impact on poverty: Equity or exclusion? Education for all in the Caribbean (Monograph series 16). Mona, Jamaica: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  48. Kamens, D. H., & Benavot, A. (2011). National, regional and international learning assessments: Trends among developing countries, 1960–2009. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(2), 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kedir, A. M., & Sookram, S. (2013). Poverty and welfare of the poor in a high-income country: Evidence from Trinidad and Tobago. Journal of International Development, 25(4), 520–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kieffer, M. J. (2008). Catching up or falling behind? Initial English proficiency, concentrated poverty, and the reading growth of language minority learners in the United States. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 851–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Krutikova, S., Rolleston, C., & Aurino, E. (2014). How much difference does school make and for whom? A two-country study of the impact of school quality on educational attainment. In M. Bourdillion & J. Boyden (Eds.), Growing up in poverty: Findings from young lives (pp. 201–224). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  52. Lee, V. E. (2000). Using hierarchical linear modeling to study social contexts: The case of school effects. Educational Psychologist, 35(2), 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lipina, S. J., Simonds, J., & Segretin, M. S. (2011). Recognizing the child in child poverty. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 6(1), 8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. London, N. A. (1989). Selecting students for secondary education in a developing society: The case of Trinidad and Tobago. McGill Journal of Education, 24(3), 281–291.Google Scholar
  55. Ma, X., Ma, L., & Bradley, K. D. (2008). Using multilevel modeling to investigate school effects. In A. A. O’Connell & D. B. McCoach (Eds.), Multilevel modeling of educational data (pp. 59–110). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  56. Maguire, E. R., & Fishbein, D. H. (2016). The influence of family characteristics on problem behaviors in a sample of high-risk Caribbean adolescents. Family Relations, 65(1), 120–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Marks, G. N. (2006). Family size, family type and student achievement: Cross-national differences and the role of socioeconomic and school factors. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 37(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Marks, G. N., McMillan, J., Jones, F. L., & Ainley, J. (2000). The measurement of socioeconomic status for the reporting of nationally comparable outcomes of schooling. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  59. McIntosh, T. (2006). Theorising marginality and the processes of marginalisation. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Scholarship, (Special Supplement), S47–S65.Google Scholar
  60. Minujin, A., Delamonica, E., Davidziuk, A., & Gonzalez, E. D. (2006). The definition of child poverty: A discussion of concepts and measurements. Environment & Urbanization, 18(2), 481–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mowat, J. G. (2015). Towards a new conceptualisation of marginalisation. European Educational Research Journal, 14(5), 454–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2017). PIRLS 2016: International results in reading. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College; Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).Google Scholar
  63. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2007). No more failures: Ten steps to equity in education. Paris, France: Author.Google Scholar
  64. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2010a). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do: Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Volume I). Paris, France: Author.Google Scholar
  65. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2010b). PISA 2009 results: Overcoming social background: Equity in learning opportunities and outcomes (Volume II). Paris, France: Author.Google Scholar
  66. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2010c). PISA 2009 results: What makes a school successful? Resources, policies, and practices (Volume II). Paris, France: Author.Google Scholar
  67. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2016a). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematics and financial literacy, PISA. Paris, France: Author.Google Scholar
  68. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2016b). PISA 2015 results (volume I): Excellence and equity in education, PISA. Paris, France: Author.Google Scholar
  69. Pearrow, M., Sander, J., & Jones, J. (2017). Comparing communities: The cultural characteristics of ethnic social capital. Education and Urban Society. Advanced online publication. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0013124517747680
  70. Petgrave, K. (2011). Equality in education? A study of Jamaican schools under Michael Manley, 1972–80. Caribbean Quarterly, 57(2), 24–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pinsonneault, A., & Kraemer, K. (1993). Survey research methodology in management information systems: an assessment. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(2), 75–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Raffo, C., Dyson, A., Gunter, H., Hall, D., Jones, L., & Kalambouka, A. (2009). Education and poverty: Mapping the terrain and making the links to educational policy. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(4), 341–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ravela, P. (2005). A formative approach to national assessments: The case of Uruguay. Prospects, 35(1), 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ravela, P., Arregui, P., Valverde, G., Wolfe, R., Ferrer, G., Martinez Rizo, F., … Wolff, L. (2008). Las evaluaciones educativas que America Latina nesecita [The educational. assessments that Latin America needs]. Santiago de Chile: PREAL.Google Scholar
  75. Rutkowski, L., & Rutkowski, D. (2016). A call for a more measured approach to reporting and interpreting PISA results. Educational Researcher, 45(4), 252–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schleicher, A. (2009). International benchmarking as a lever for policy reform. In A. Hargreaves & M. Fullan (Eds.), Change wars (pp. 97–116). Bloomington, IN: IN Solution Tree.Google Scholar
  77. Shanks, T. R. W., & Robinson, C. (2013). Assets, economic opportunity and toxic stress: A framework for understanding child and educational outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 33, 154–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shields, S. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shumba, A. (2010). Resilience in children of poverty. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 20(2), 211–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Strand, S. (2010). Do some schools narrow the gap? Differential school effectiveness by ethnicity, gender, poverty, and prior achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(3), 289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Strand, S. (2016). Do some schools narrow the gap? Differential school effectiveness revisited. Review of Education, 4(2), 107–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  84. Taylor, R. (1990). Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: A basic review. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, 6(1), 35–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tefera, A. A., Powers, J., & Fischman, G. (2018). Editors introduction: Intersectionality in education: A conceptual aspiration and research imperative. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), vii–xvii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Thomson, E., Hanson, T. L., & McLanahan, S. S. (1994). Family structure and child well-being: Economic resources vs. parental behaviors. Social Forces, 73(1), 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tramonte, L., & Willms, J. D. (2010). Cultural capital and its effects on education outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 29(2), 200–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Trong, K. L. (2009). Using PIRLS 2006 to measure equity in reading achievement internationally (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Boston College.Google Scholar
  89. UNESCO. (1990). World declaration on education for all. Paris, France: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  90. UNESCO. (2000). The Dakar framework for action. Paris, France: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  91. UNESCO. (2009). Reaching and teaching the most marginalized. Concept note for the 2010 Global Monitoring Report. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/ED/GMR/pdf/gmr2010/Consult2010_concept_note.pdf
  92. Valentine, G. (2007). Theorizing and researching intersectionality: A challenge for feminist geography. The Professional Geographer, 59(1), 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Van der Berg, S. (2008). Poverty and education (Education Policy Series 10). Paris, France/Brussels, Belgium: International Institute for Educational Planning/International Academy of Education.Google Scholar
  94. Vigil, J. D. (2016). Multiple marginality: A comparative framework for understanding gangs. In M. C. Hay (Ed.), Methods that matter: Integrating mixed methods for more effective social science research (pp. 284–305). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  95. Vyas, S., & Kumaranayake, L. (2006). Constructing socio-economic status indices: How to use principal components analysis. Health Policy & Planning, 21(6), 459–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wagner, D. A., Lockheed, M., Mullis, I., Martin, M. O., Kanjee, A., Gove, A., & Dowd, A. J. (2012). The debate on learning assessments in developing countries. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 42(3), 509–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Walby, S., Armstrong, J., & Strid, S. (2012). Intersectionality: Multiple inequalities in social theory. Sociology, 46(2), 224–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Weinfurt, K. P. (1995). Multivariate analysis of variance. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 245–276). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  99. White, K. R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91(3), 461–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Whitty, G., & Power, S. (2000). Marketization and privatization in mass education systems. International Journal of Educational Development, 20(2), 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wijnberg, M. H., & Weinger, S. (1997). Marginalization and the single mother: A comparison of two studies. Affilia, 12(2), 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Williams, E. E. (1968). Education in the British West Indies. New York, NY: A & B Book Publishers.Google Scholar
  103. Willms, J. D. (2006). Learning divides: Ten policy questions about the performance and equity of schools and schooling systems. Montreal, QC: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.uis.unesco.org/template/pdf/EducGeneral/WP5LearningDivides.pdfGoogle Scholar
  104. Winchester, H. (1990). Women and children last: The poverty and marginalisation of one-parent families. Transactions, Institute of British Geographers, 15, 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Woolcock, J. (1984). Class conflict and class reproduction of Jamaican educational reforms of 1957 and 1962. Social & Economic Studies, 33(4), 51–99.Google Scholar
  106. Yoshikawa, H., Aber, J. L., & Beardslee, W. R. (2012). The effects of poverty on the mental, emotional, and behavioral health of children and youth: implications for prevention. American Psychologist, 67(4), 272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Zwick, R., & Dorans, N. J. (2016). Philosophical perspectives on assessment fairness. In N. J. Dorans & L. L. Cook (Eds.), Fairness in educational assessment and measurement (pp. 267–282). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jerome De Lisle
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationThe University of the West IndiesSt. AugustineTrinidad and Tobago

Personalised recommendations